IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v138y2024ics0264837723005008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recasting tenure and labour in non-equilibrium environments: Making the case for “high-reliability” pastoral institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Pappagallo, Linda

Abstract

This paper explores how pastoralists collectively manage resources in contexts of high environmental variability in the drylands of southern Tunisia. The khlata, the practice of pooling herds, allows for livestock owners to manage scarce resources in environments characterized by non-equilibrium dynamics. This institution legitimizes access to a wider range of pasture land thus tracking patchy rainfall distribution, and allows for the sharing of herding labour and so allows for “absence” in pastoral production, thus enabling human mobility. The khlata, recasts conceptualizations of tenure and labour in ways that subvert neoliberal models of production, and adapt to changing political economic conditions. Such collective herding practices can be likened to “high-reliability” management ideas that accommodate the social and networked dimensions of land-use in drylands, where coordination and connectivity through institutions becomes crucial. The theoretical approach includes pastoral perspectives on tenure, where rules are not well defined and membership is fluid, contributing to a different take on conventional common-property debates and neoliberal views on property, and indeed institutions. When pastoral production is framed as a high-reliability system, the objective of maintaining security and at the same time flexibility in land tenure is emphasised: livestock owners make use of a wide range of scale-dependent resources, whether public, private, or common property. Land-use policy should therefore focus not on rules and regulations but how to support institutions that maintain a highly-reliable system within contexts of fuzzy tenure regimes. Land-use policy should therefore focus on coordinating connectivity through collective arrangements by prioritizing the “informal” and adaptive nature of institutions such as the khlata, rather than focusing on their formalization. Overall, the paper shows how the khlata redefines access to land and labour in ways that create additional options for pastoralists to adapt to changing political economic conditions in southern Tunisia.

Suggested Citation

  • Pappagallo, Linda, 2024. "Recasting tenure and labour in non-equilibrium environments: Making the case for “high-reliability” pastoral institutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723005008
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723005008
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723005008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.