IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v505y2025ics0304380025001061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating comprehensive watershed management sustainability based on the emergy ecological footprint model: A case study of Hainan Island, China

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Xudong
  • Chen, Jiadong
  • Guo, Jianchao
  • Wu, Hui
  • Zuo, Qin
  • Chen, Yizhuang
  • Huang, Xian
  • Qi, Shi

Abstract

Comprehensive watershed management, which realizes the protection, optimal utilization and ecological restoration of regional soil and water resources is the primary method for controlling soil and water loss in China. However, the deployment of soil erosion control measures requires many resources that increase the environmental load and thus impact ecosystem sustainability. In this study, an emergy ecological footprint model based on emergy theory was developed, and to assess the sustainability of a comprehensive watershed management ecosystem on Hainan Island, China. The results show that: (1) Among the input resources, the emergy ecological footprint (EEF) of machinery was the largest, at 3213.89 hm²; among the construction resources, high-strength materials such as stone, concrete and steel bars were mainly used, and the EEF was greater than 60 %. (2) The primary sources of EEF for comprehensive watershed management were engineering measures project (8554.33 hm²), at >92 %. Gulley erosion control (GEC) was the largest source, followed by slope water works (SWW) and field roads (FR). (3) Renewable resources provide the main ecological carrying capacity (ECC) of the comprehensive watershed management ecosystem; however, the sum of ecological and economic benefit ECCs is 23.92 %. (4) Initially, the ecological profit and loss of the comprehensive watershed management ecosystem (CWME) was −7099.81 hm², and the ecological footprint intensity was 4.28, indicating an ecological deficit, which is not conducive to sustainable development. However, an ecological turning point occurred in 2025: the cumulative ECC exceeded the cumulative EEF, at which point CWME achieved an ecological surplus. Therefore, although the preconstruction period generates considerable ecological pressure, overall, comprehensive watershed management supports sustainable development of the ecological environment. This study provides new trade-off ideas for ecological restoration projects such as comprehensive watershed management.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Xudong & Chen, Jiadong & Guo, Jianchao & Wu, Hui & Zuo, Qin & Chen, Yizhuang & Huang, Xian & Qi, Shi, 2025. "Evaluating comprehensive watershed management sustainability based on the emergy ecological footprint model: A case study of Hainan Island, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 505(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:505:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001061
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001061
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:505:y:2025:i:c:s0304380025001061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.