IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v428y2020ics0304380020301228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil system dynamics for learning about complex, feedback-driven agricultural resource problems: model development, evaluation, and sensitivity analysis of biophysical feedbacks

Author

Listed:
  • Turner, Benjamin L.
  • Kodali, Srinadh

Abstract

Soils form the foundation of terrestrial ecosystems that regulate the processes and functions driving ecosystem goods and services provisions that humans rely on, including agriculture. Pressing agricultural resource challenges persist, including those involving irrigation, fertilization, and salinization, due to the complex, coupled, and feedback-driven connectivity of various soil processes that are difficult to manage. Soil moisture dynamics cross-cut these processes and is a logical integration point for generating understanding and new insights for improved agroecosystem management. This paper presents an integrated soil-water-nutrient-plant interaction model (built within a system dynamics framework) with the purpose of replicating soil moisture evolution for a set of unique soils and climates, examining model performance given common irrigation (e.g., frequency and application rates) and crop management considerations (e.g., fertilization, tillage, cover cropping), and evaluating via sensitivity analysis model robustness and quantifying influential management parameters effect on core bio-physical feedbacks at the soil-level. The model has four main state variables (soil moisture, soil nitrogen, soil sodium, and plant canopy cover) that interact dynamically via feedback processes (formulated as coupled partial differential equations) between them. Exogenous variables included precipitation time-series data and required climatic parameters to determine reference (potential) evapotranspiration. The time-unit used from simulation was 1 day (time-step = 0.25) with a simulation horizon of 365 days. The model was calibrated using a variety of sources in the literature and with comparison to observed soil moisture data from four sites in Texas, USA, and evaluated statistically for accuracy (mean bias), precision, (coefficient of determination), and overall fit (Theil inequality statistics). Sensitivity analyses were conducted for a variety of hydroclimate forcing and irrigation, fertilization, and crop management decisions to examine the impacts to soil moisture evolution, soil salinity, and cropping profitability, among other variables. Calibration results showed high degrees of agreement between observed and predicted values (mean r2 = 0.67, mean bias = 0.008%). Sensitivity results demonstrated that precipitation frequency was more influential than precipitation depth in regulating soil moisture, that irrigation threshold (i.e., the soil moisture level inducing irrigation) was the variable most influential to crop profitability (which was maximized at the lowest irrigation threshold value), and that several conservation management strategies (i.e., no-till with residue management or cover cropping) improved soil moisture and crop profitability, contrary to common management perceptions. Several other tests for alternative fertilization, irrigation, and tile drain installation strategies produced results that corroborate common observations of agroecosystem management (i.e., despite environmental risks, crop profitability was enhanced). Future model extensions include expansion of the irrigation, fertilization, and crop management decision making factors to better capture how decisions that respond to economic and policy signals influence resource use and soil system dynamics. Modeling these complex, feedback driven agroecosystems processes remains an arena for future modeling innovations that will support important resource management improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Turner, Benjamin L. & Kodali, Srinadh, 2020. "Soil system dynamics for learning about complex, feedback-driven agricultural resource problems: model development, evaluation, and sensitivity analysis of biophysical feedbacks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:428:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301228
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020301228
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Fernald & Vincent Tidwell & José Rivera & Sylvia Rodríguez & Steven Guldan & Caitriana Steele & Carlos Ochoa & Brian Hurd & Marquita Ortiz & Kenneth Boykin & Andres Cibils, 2012. "Modeling Sustainability of Water, Environment, Livelihood, and Culture in Traditional Irrigation Communities and Their Linked Watersheds," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(11), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Benjamin L. Turner & Vincent Tidwell & Alexander Fernald & José A. Rivera & Sylvia Rodriguez & Steven Guldan & Carlos Ochoa & Brian Hurd & Kenneth Boykin & Andres Cibils, 2016. "Modeling Acequia Irrigation Systems Using System Dynamics: Model Development, Evaluation, and Sensitivity Analyses to Investigate Effects of Socio-Economic and Biophysical Feedbacks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-30, October.
    3. De Michele, C. & Vezzoli, R. & Pavlopoulos, H. & Scholes, R.J., 2008. "A minimal model of soil water–vegetation interactions forced by stochastic rainfall in water-limited ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 397-407.
    4. Kumar, R. & Jat, M.K. & Shankar, V., 2013. "Evaluation of modeling of water ecohydrologic dynamics in soil–root system," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 51-60.
    5. Abd El-Wahed, M.H. & Ali, E.A., 2013. "Effect of irrigation systems, amounts of irrigation water and mulching on corn yield, water use efficiency and net profit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 64-71.
    6. David Tilman & Kenneth G. Cassman & Pamela A. Matson & Rosamond Naylor & Stephen Polasky, 2002. "Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6898), pages 671-677, August.
    7. Xia, Y.Q. & Shao, M.A., 2008. "Soil water carrying capacity for vegetation: A hydrologic and biogeochemical process model solution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 112-124.
    8. Wichelns, Dennis & Qadir, Manzoor, 2015. "Achieving sustainable irrigation requires effective management of salts, soil salinity, and shallow groundwater," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 31-38.
    9. Ali, M.H. & Hoque, M.R. & Hassan, A.A. & Khair, A., 2007. "Effects of deficit irrigation on yield, water productivity, and economic returns of wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 151-161, September.
    10. Pelak, Norman & Revelli, Roberto & Porporato, Amilcare, 2017. "A dynamical systems framework for crop models: Toward optimal fertilization and irrigation strategies under climatic variability," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 365(C), pages 80-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Langarudi, Saeed P. & Maxwell, Connie M. & Bai, Yining & Hanson, Austin & Fernald, Alexander, 2019. "Does Socioeconomic Feedback Matter for Water Models?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 35-45.
    2. Elisa Morri & Riccardo Santolini, 2021. "Ecosystem Services Valuation for the Sustainable Land Use Management by Nature-Based Solution (NbS) in the Common Agricultural Policy Actions: A Case Study on the Foglia River Basin (Marche Region, It," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    4. Liang Liu & Cong Feng & Hongwei Zhang & Xuehua Zhang, 2015. "Game Analysis and Simulation of the River Basin Sustainable Development Strategy Integrating Water Emission Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Shen Yuan & Shaobing Peng, 2017. "Exploring the Trends in Nitrogen Input and Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Agricultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Katarina Arvidsson Segerkvist & Helena Hansson & Ulf Sonesson & Stefan Gunnarsson, 2021. "A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature on Sustainability at Farm-Level in Beef and Lamb Meat Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Vainio, Annukka & Tienhaara, Annika & Haltia, Emmi & Hyvönen, Terho & Pyysiäinen, Jarkko & Pouta, Eija, 2021. "The legitimacy of result-oriented and action-oriented agri-environmental schemes: A comparison of farmers’ and citizens’ perceptions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    8. Hualin Xie & Yingqian Huang & Qianru Chen & Yanwei Zhang & Qing Wu, 2019. "Prospects for Agricultural Sustainable Intensification: A Review of Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    10. Paul L. G. Vlek & Asia Khamzina & Hossein Azadi & Anik Bhaduri & Luna Bharati & Ademola Braimoh & Christopher Martius & Terry Sunderland & Fatemeh Taheri, 2017. "Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Diriba Shiferaw G., 2017. "Water-Nutrients Interaction: Exploring the Effects of Water as a Central Role for Availability & Use Efficiency of Nutrients by Shallow Rooted Vegetable Crops - A Review," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(10), pages 78-93, 10-2017.
    12. Sheng Gong & Jason.S. Bergtold & Elizabeth Yeager, 2021. "Assessing the joint adoption and complementarity between in-field conservation practices of Kansas farmers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Seufert, Verena & Ramankutty, Navin & Mayerhofer, Tabea, 2017. "What is this thing called organic? – How organic farming is codified in regulations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 10-20.
    14. Jónsson, Jón Örvar G. & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P. & Giannakis, Georgios V., 2019. "Tools for Sustainable Soil Management: Soil Ecosystem Services, EROI and Economic Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 109-119.
    15. Kataki, Sampriti & West, Helen & Clarke, Michèle & Baruah, D.C., 2016. "Phosphorus recovery as struvite: Recent concerns for use of seed, alternative Mg source, nitrogen conservation and fertilizer potential," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 142-156.
    16. Ashley E. Larsen & Steven D. Gaines & Olivier Deschênes, 2017. "Agricultural pesticide use and adverse birth outcomes in the San Joaquin Valley of California," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Carpentier, A. & Reboud, X., 2018. "Why farmers consider pesticides the ultimate in crop protection: economic and behavioral insights," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277528, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Tiziano Gomiero, 2016. "Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-41, March.
    19. Alexander D. Chapman & Stephen E. Darby & Hoàng M. Hồng & Emma L. Tompkins & Tri P. D. Van, 2016. "Adaptation and development trade-offs: fluvial sediment deposition and the sustainability of rice-cropping in An Giang Province, Mekong Delta," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 593-608, August.
    20. Rosa, R.D. & Ramos, T.B. & Pereira, L.S., 2016. "The dual Kc approach to assess maize and sweet sorghum transpiration and soil evaporation under saline conditions: Application of the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:428:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020301228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.