IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v340y2016icp106-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of invasive species on the sustainable use of native exploited species

Author

Listed:
  • Paul, Prosenjit
  • Kar, T.K.

Abstract

In recent years, the important challenging issues are biological invasions to biodiversity, overexploitation and extinction of several species. Invasive species often alter the workings of ecosystems around the globe. In the present research, our aim is to study the possible impacts of invasive species on the sustainable use of native exploited species. To address this issue, cleaning operation is introduced to protect biodiversity and recover stocks. It is found that presence of invasive species reduces the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) of native species. In case of prey–predator system, prey harvesting at MSY level causes the extinction of predator species, but extinction effort increases with the cleaning effort. It is also observed that when independent efforts are applied on both the prey and predator species, global maximum sustainable total yield (MSTY) exists and it increases as the cleaning effort increases. In all the cases it is found that appropriate cleaning effort may reduce the impacts of biological invasions on the sustainable use of resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul, Prosenjit & Kar, T.K., 2016. "Impacts of invasive species on the sustainable use of native exploited species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 106-115.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:340:y:2016:i:c:p:106-115
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380016303763
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solow Andrew & Polasky Stephen & Broadus James, 1993. "On the Measurement of Biological Diversity," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 60-68, January.
    2. Steven Polasky & Andrew R. Solow, 1993. "Option Value, Gallot's Inequality, And The Measurement Of Biological Diversity," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 241, Boston College Department of Economics.
    3. Kar, T.K. & Ghosh, Bapan, 2013. "Impacts of maximum sustainable yield policy to prey–predator systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 134-142.
    4. Paul, Prosenjit & Kar, T.K. & Ghorai, Abhijit, 2016. "Ecotourism and fishing in a common ground of two interacting species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Reithe, Siv & Armstrong, Claire W. & Flaaten, Ola, 2014. "Marine protected areas in a welfare-based perspective," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 29-36.
    6. Frésard, Marjolaine & Ropars-Collet, Carole, 2014. "Sustainable harvest of a native species and control of an invasive species: A bioeconomic model of a commercial fishery invaded by a space competitor," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Das, Debabrata & Kar, T.K. & Pal, Debprasad, 2023. "The impact of invasive species on some ecological services in a harvested predator–prey system," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 66-90.
    2. Choirul Basir & Asep Kuswandi Supriatna & Sukono & Jumadil Saputra, 2023. "Prey–Predator Mathematics Model for Fisheries Insurance Calculations in the Search of Optimal Strategies for Inland Fisheries Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerrit Ansmann & Tobias Bollenbach, 2021. "Building clone-consistent ecosystem models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Courtois, Pierre & Figuières, Charles & Mulier, Chloe, 2019. "A Tale of Two Diversities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 133-147.
    3. Perry, Neil, 2010. "The ecological importance of species and the Noah's Ark problem," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 478-485, January.
    4. Ricotta, Carlo & Szeidl, Laszlo, 2009. "Diversity partitioning of Rao’s quadratic entropy," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 76(4), pages 299-302.
    5. Bartkowski, Bartosz & Lienhoop, Nele & Hansjürgens, Bernd, 2015. "Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-14.
    6. Simpson, R. David, 2002. "Definitions of Biodiversity and Measures of Its Value," Discussion Papers 10551, Resources for the Future.
    7. Das, Debabrata & Kar, T.K. & Pal, Debprasad, 2023. "The impact of invasive species on some ecological services in a harvested predator–prey system," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 66-90.
    8. Yoshida, Jun & Kono, Tatsuhito, 2022. "Cities and biodiversity: Spatial efficiency of land use," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 685-705.
    9. Martin L. Weitzman, 1998. "The Noah's Ark Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(6), pages 1279-1298, November.
    10. Gerber, Nicolas, 2011. "Biodiversity measures based on species-level dissimilarities: A methodology for assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2275-2281.
    11. Pavoine, Sandrine & Bonsall, Michael B., 2009. "Biological diversity: Distinct distributions can lead to the maximization of Rao’s quadratic entropy," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 153-163.
    12. Stephen Polasky & Jeffrey D. Camm & Brian Garber-Yonts, 2001. "Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(1), pages 68-78.
    13. Okamura, Keisuke, 2020. "Affinity-based extension of non-extensive entropy and statistical mechanics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 557(C).
    14. G. Andrew Karolyi & John Tobin‐de la Puente, 2023. "Biodiversity finance: A call for research into financing nature," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(2), pages 231-251, June.
    15. Brei, Michael & Pérez-Barahona, Agustín & Strobl, Eric, 2016. "Environmental pollution and biodiversity: Light pollution and sea turtles in the Caribbean," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 95-116.
    16. Perry, Neil & Shankar, Sriram, 2017. "The State-contingent Approach to the Noah's Ark Problem," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 65-72.
    17. Amy Craft & R. Simpson, 2001. "The Value of Biodiversity in Pharmaceutical Research with Differentiated Products," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Anne-Sarah Chiambretto & Hubert Stahn, 2017. "Voluntary Management of Fisheries under an Uncertain Background Legislative Threat," Working Papers halshs-01500543, HAL.
    19. Françoise Benhamou & Stéphanie Peltier, 2007. "How should cultural diversity be measured? An application using the French publishing industry," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 31(2), pages 85-107, June.
    20. Eppink, Florian V. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2007. "Ecological theories and indicators in economic models of biodiversity loss and conservation: A critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 284-293, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:340:y:2016:i:c:p:106-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.