IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v266y2013icp10-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breeding habitat selection of Skylarks varies with crop heterogeneity, time and spatial scale, and reveals spatial and temporal crop complementation

Author

Listed:
  • Miguet, Paul
  • Gaucherel, Cédric
  • Bretagnolle, Vincent

Abstract

While many studies having investigated the effects of landscape complexity or heterogeneity on farmland biodiversity were focus on semi-natural habitats (e.g. forests, hedgerows), few have analyzed the consequences of local crop heterogeneity on species abundance. Here we quantify the effects of crop heterogeneity on the breeding habitat selection of the Skylark Alauda arvensis at spatial scales ranging from micro-habitat to landscape, in a western France farmland. We address the question of finding the processes behind the crop heterogeneity effect, usually never studied whatever the taxa. We first studied how crop composition at continuous spatial scales from within the breeding territory to the landscape (20-2000m) affected Skylark habitat selection within a breeding season (i.e. the effect of each crop compared to the others), and how this selection changed with time. Second, we examined how the diversity of crops within areas of radius from 20 to 2000m affected habitat selection by Skylarks. Third, we investigated for the processes behind the crop diversity, examining the detailed pattern of crop selection at the territory scale in presence of only two crops, to identify the synergetic effects of the simultaneous presence of two crops. Using an adequate spatial sampling of 200m radius circular plots in which Skylarks positions were mapped twice the year, we observed a strong selection for grasslands, an intermediate selection for cereals and spring-sown crops (changing with scale and time), and an avoidance of oilseed rape. Selection for grasslands increased with the season, selection for spring-sown crops and oilseed rape was stable, while selection for cereals decreased but only at fine scale. Skylarks selected high crop diversity at the territory scale. Similarly, the synergetic effect of the presence of two crops was positive in most cases, and Skylarks preferred area with two crops rather than only one for some pairs of crops, indicative of landscape complementation (requirement for complementary resources located in different crop types). Our results suggest that smaller fields and crops well mixed in the landscape may benefit this farmland specialist, favouring the positive effects of the simultaneous presence of several crops. The study demonstrates the importance of considering simultaneously time and spatial scale dependencies, as well as the synergetic effects and the spatial arrangement of habitats in habitat selection studies, particularly in patchy dynamics environments such as farmlands.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguet, Paul & Gaucherel, Cédric & Bretagnolle, Vincent, 2013. "Breeding habitat selection of Skylarks varies with crop heterogeneity, time and spatial scale, and reveals spatial and temporal crop complementation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 10-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:266:y:2013:i:c:p:10-18
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.06.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380013003244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.06.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John R. Krebs & Jeremy D. Wilson & Richard B. Bradbury & Gavin M. Siriwardena, 1999. "The second Silent Spring?," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6745), pages 611-612, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nándor Csikós & Péter Szilassi, 2021. "Modelling the Impacts of Habitat Changes on the Population Density of Eurasian Skylark ( Alauda arvensis ) Based on Its Landscape Preferences," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Bredemeier, Birte & von Haaren, Christina & Rüter, Stefan & Reich, Michael & Meise, Thomas, 2015. "Evaluating the nature conservation value of field habitats: A model approach for targeting agri-environmental measures and projecting their effects," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 113-122.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graef, F. & Stachow, U. & Werner, A. & Schutte, G., 2007. "Agricultural practice changes with cultivating genetically modified herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 111-118, May.
    2. Barraquand, F. & Martinet, V., 2011. "Biological conservation in dynamic agricultural landscapes: Effectiveness of public policies and trade-offs with agricultural production," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 910-920, March.
    3. Pretty, J. N. & Brett, C. & Gee, D. & Hine, R. E. & Mason, C. F. & Morison, J. I. L. & Raven, H. & Rayment, M. D. & van der Bijl, G., 2000. "An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 113-136, August.
    4. Gregor Devine & Michael Furlong, 2007. "Insecticide use: Contexts and ecological consequences," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 24(3), pages 281-306, September.
    5. Verboom, Jana & Alkemade, Rob & Klijn, Jan & Metzger, Marc J. & Reijnen, Rien, 2007. "Combining biodiversity modeling with political and economic development scenarios for 25 EU countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 267-276, April.
    6. Martinet, Vincent, 2014. "The economics of the Food versus Biodiversity debate," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182800, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Schonhart, Martin & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Schmid, Erwin, 2010. "Integrated land use modelling of agri-environmental measures to maintain biodiversity at landscape level," 120th Seminar, September 2-4, 2010, Chania, Crete 109401, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Tiziano Gomiero, 2013. "Alternative Land Management Strategies and Their Impact on Soil Conservation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Lauriane MOUYSSET & Luc DOYEN & Jean-Christophe PEREAU & Fréderic JIGUET, 2013. "A double benefit of biodiversity in agriculture," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2013-04, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    10. Singh, Ajay & Krause, Peter & Panda, Sudhindra N. & Flugel, Wolfgang-Albert, 2010. "Rising water table: A threat to sustainable agriculture in an irrigated semi-arid region of Haryana, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1443-1451, October.
    11. Baba, S.H. & Wani, S.A., 2018. "Ecosystem Management Approach for Agricultural Growth in Mountains: Farmers Perception of Ecosystem Services and Dis-Services in Kashmir-India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277556, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. José Luis Molina-Pardo & Emilio Rodríguez-Caballero & Miguel Cueto & Pablo Barranco & Manuel Sánchez-Robles & Azucena Laguía-Allué & Esther Giménez-Luque, 2021. "Effects of Agricultural Use on Endangered Plant Taxa in Spain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    13. Mouysset, L. & Doyen, L. & Jiguet, F. & Allaire, G. & Leger, F., 2011. "Bio economic modeling for a sustainable management of biodiversity in agricultural lands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 617-626, February.
    14. Michel Fok & Jean-Louis Le Guerroué & Pasquale Lubello, 2010. "Un état de coexistence du soja transgénique et conventionnel au Paraná, Brésil," Post-Print halshs-00540820, HAL.
    15. Schönhart, Martin & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Schmid, Erwin & Muhar, Andreas, 2011. "Integration of bio-physical and economic models to analyze management intensity and landscape structure effects at farm and landscape level," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 122-134, February.
    16. Walder, Peter & Kantelhardt, Jochen, 2018. "The Environmental Behaviour of Farmers – Capturing the Diversity of Perspectives with a Q Methodological Approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 55-63.
    17. Wu, Xin & Zheng, Yi & Wu, Bin & Tian, Yong & Han, Feng & Zheng, Chunmiao, 2016. "Optimizing conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater for irrigation to address human-nature water conflicts: A surrogate modeling approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 380-392.
    18. Lauriane MOUYSSET & Luc DOYEN & Fréderic JIGUET, 2012. "How does the economic risk aversion affect biodiversity?," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-03, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    19. Scherer, Cédric & Jeltsch, Florian & Grimm, Volker & Blaum, Niels, 2016. "Merging trait-based and individual-based modelling: An animal functional type approach to explore the responses of birds to climatic and land use changes in semi-arid African savannas," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 75-89.
    20. Tohiran, Kamil Azmi & Nobilly, Frisco & Zulkifli, Raja & Yahya, Muhammad Syafiq & Norhisham, Ahmad Razi & Rasyidi, Md Zainal & Azhar, Badrul, 2023. "Multi-species rotational grazing of small ruminants regenerates undergrowth vegetation while controlling weeds in the oil palm silvopastoral system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:266:y:2013:i:c:p:10-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.