IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i3p306-d519272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the Impacts of Habitat Changes on the Population Density of Eurasian Skylark ( Alauda arvensis ) Based on Its Landscape Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Nándor Csikós

    (Department of Geoinformatics, Physical and Environmental Geography, University of Szeged, Egyetem utca 2-6, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Péter Szilassi

    (Department of Geoinformatics, Physical and Environmental Geography, University of Szeged, Egyetem utca 2-6, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary)

Abstract

The dramatic decline of the abundance of farmland bird species can be related to the level of land-use intensity or the land-cover heterogeneity of rural landscapes. Our study area in central Europe (Hungary) included 3049 skylark observation points and their 600 m buffer zones. We used a very detailed map (20 × 20 m minimum mapping unit), the Hungarian Ecosystem Basemap, as a land-cover dataset for the calculation of three landscape indices: mean patch size (MPS), mean fractal dimension (MFRACT), and Shannon diversity index (SDI) to describe the landscape structure of the study areas. Generalized linear models were used to analyze the effect of land-cover types and landscape patterns on the abundance of the Eurasian skylark ( Alauda arvensis ). According to our findings, the proportions of arable land, open sand steppes, closed grassland patches, and shape complexity and size characteristics of these land cover patches have a positive effect on skylark abundance, while the SDI was negatively associated with the skylark population. On the basis of the used statistical model, the abundance density (individuals/km*) of skylarks could be estimated with 37.77% absolute percentage error and 2.12 mean absolute error. We predicted the skylark population density inside the Natura 2000 Special Protected Area of Hungary which is 0–6 individuals/km* and 23746 ± 8968 skylarks. The results can be implemented for the landscape management of rural landscapes, and the method used are adaptable for the density estimation of other farmland bird species in rural landscapes. According to our findings, inside the protected areas should increase the proportion, the average size and shape complexity of arable land, salt steppes and meadows, and closed grassland land cover patches.

Suggested Citation

  • Nándor Csikós & Péter Szilassi, 2021. "Modelling the Impacts of Habitat Changes on the Population Density of Eurasian Skylark ( Alauda arvensis ) Based on Its Landscape Preferences," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:306-:d:519272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/306/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/306/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Michael Link & Christine Schleupner, 2007. "Agricultural land use changes in Eiderstedt," Working Papers FNU-137, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Jun 2007.
    2. Gippoliti, Spartaco & Battisti, Corrado, 2017. "More cool than tool: Equivoques, conceptual traps and weaknesses of ecological networks in environmental planning and conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 686-691.
    3. Georgiana Toth & Alina Huzui-Stoiculescu & Alexandru-Ioan Toth & Robert Stoiculescu, 2020. "How Do Natura 2000 Areas Intersect with Peoples’ Livelihood Strategies in High Nature Value Farmlands in Southern Transylvania?," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. P. Schlager & C. Ruppert-Winkel & K. Schmieder, 2020. "Assessing the potential impacts of bioenergy cropping on a population of the ground-breeding bird Alauda arvensis: a case study from southern Germany," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(8), pages 1000-1017, November.
    5. Nándor Csikós & Péter Szilassi, 2020. "Impact of Energy Landscapes on the Abundance of Eurasian Skylark ( Alauda arvensis ), an Example from North Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Miguet, Paul & Gaucherel, Cédric & Bretagnolle, Vincent, 2013. "Breeding habitat selection of Skylarks varies with crop heterogeneity, time and spatial scale, and reveals spatial and temporal crop complementation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 10-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diane Pearson & Julian Gorman & Richard Aspinall, 2022. "Multiple Roles for Landscape Ecology in Future Farming Systems: An Editorial Overview," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5, February.
    2. Julieta Benitez & Marcelo D. Barrera & Yamina M. Rosas & Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur & María V. Lencinas, 2022. "Landscape and Stand Characteristics Influence on the Bird Assemblage in Nothofagus antarctica Forests of Tierra del Fuego," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bredemeier, Birte & von Haaren, Christina & Rüter, Stefan & Reich, Michael & Meise, Thomas, 2015. "Evaluating the nature conservation value of field habitats: A model approach for targeting agri-environmental measures and projecting their effects," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 113-122.
    2. Megan K. Jennings & Emily Haeuser & Diane Foote & Rebecca L. Lewison & Erin Conlisk, 2020. "Planning for Dynamic Connectivity: Operationalizing Robust Decision-Making and Prioritization Across Landscapes Experiencing Climate and Land-Use Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Megan K. Jennings & Katherine A. Zeller & Rebecca L. Lewison, 2020. "Supporting Adaptive Connectivity in Dynamic Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Nandor Csikos & Malte Schwanebeck & Michael Kuhwald & Peter Szilassi & Rainer Duttmann, 2019. "Density of Biogas Power Plants as An Indicator of Bioenergy Generated Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Meike Fienitz & Rosemarie Siebert, 2021. "Urban versus Rural? Conflict Lines in Land Use Disputes in the Urban–Rural Fringe Region of Schwerin, Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Foltête, Jean-Christophe, 2019. "How ecological networks could benefit from landscape graphs: A response to the paper by Spartaco Gippoliti and Corrado Battisti," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 391-394.
    7. Csikós, Nándor & Tóth, Gergely, 2023. "Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    8. Mugurel I. Jitea & Valentin C. Mihai & Felix H. Arion & Iulia C. Muresan & Diana E. Dumitras, 2021. "Innovation Gaps and Barriers in Alternative Innovative Solutions for Sustainable High Nature Value Grasslands. Evidence from Romania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Alessandro Ferrarini & Enzo Calevi & Dina Brozzetti & Alessia Colle & Riccardo De Santis & Stefano Laurenti & Enzo Savo & Marco Gustin, 2023. "Optimized Monitoring and Conservation of Farmland Bird Species through Bayesian Modelling: The Montagu’s Harrier Circus pygargus Population in Central Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Bo-Syuan Wu & Laddaporn Ruangpan & Arlex Sanchez & Marzenna Rasmussen & Eldon R. Rene & Zoran Vojinovic, 2021. "Environmental Design Features for Large-Scale Nature-Based Solutions: Development of a Framework That Incorporates Landscape Dynamics into the Design of Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Shih, Wan-Yu & Mabon, Leslie & Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A., 2020. "Assessing governance challenges of local biodiversity and ecosystem services: Barriers identified by the expert community," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Iulian Dincă & Dragoș Dărăbăneanu & Ionuț Mihai Oprea, 2021. "Collective and Social Representations on Nature and Environment: Social Psychology Investigation in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Zhonggui Lu & Wei Li & Yidi Wang & Siyang Zhou, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Ecological Networks in Nature Conservation from 1990 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Nándor Csikós & Péter Szilassi, 2020. "Impact of Energy Landscapes on the Abundance of Eurasian Skylark ( Alauda arvensis ), an Example from North Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:306-:d:519272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.