IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v234y2024ics0165176523005384.html

Conflict between consumer and worker surpluses under monopoly power

Author

Listed:
  • Sato, Susumu

Abstract

Using a simple model of monopoly and monopsony, I examine the effect of a labor-augmenting productivity gain on workers. I show that, although such a productivity gain always increases the output and consumer welfare, a firm with monopoly power may lower the labor demand and worker welfare because of the discrepancy between the marginal product and marginal revenue product of workers. The misalignment between consumer and worker welfare suggests that competition authorities need to be cautious about the potential harm of consumer-benefiting productivity gains on workers when assessing antitrust cases such as mergers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sato, Susumu, 2024. "Conflict between consumer and worker surpluses under monopoly power," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:234:y:2024:i:c:s0165176523005384
    DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176523005384
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    2. Monika Mrázová & J. Peter Neary, 2017. "Not So Demanding: Demand Structure and Firm Behavior," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(12), pages 3835-3874, December.
    3. Hans Gersbach & Armin Schmutzler, 2012. "Product markets and industry-specific training," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 43(3), pages 475-491, September.
    4. José Azar & Xavier Vives, 2021. "Reply to: Comments on “General Equilibrium Oligopoly and Ownership Structure”," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 1061-1063, May.
    5. Volker Nocke & Michael D. Whinston, 2022. "Concentration Thresholds for Horizontal Mergers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(6), pages 1915-1948, June.
    6. Anderson, Simon P. & Renault, Regis, 2003. "Efficiency and surplus bounds in Cournot competition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 253-264, December.
    7. José Azar & Xavier Vives, 2021. "General Equilibrium Oligopoly and Ownership Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(3), pages 999-1048, May.
    8. Simon Loertscher & Ellen V. Muir, 2022. "Monopoly Pricing, Optimal Randomization, and Resale," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(3), pages 566-635.
    9. David W. Berger & Thomas Hasenzagl & Kyle F. Herkenhoff & Simon Mongey & Eric A. Posner, 2023. "Merger Guidelines for the Labor Market," NBER Working Papers 31147, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Card, David & Krueger, Alan B, 1994. "Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(4), pages 772-793, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noriaki Matsushima & Kazuki Nishikawa & Jiaying Qiu, 2026. "The effects of minimum wage in inter-regional duopoly competition," OSIPP Discussion Paper 26E003, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cordoba, Juan Carlos & Liu, Xiying, 2023. "A Unified Theory of Value: Oligopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," ISU General Staff Papers 202303231249420000, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Ardakani, Omid M., 2025. "Strategic information asymmetry in tail-risk markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Aaheli Ahmed & Sugata Marjit & Debashis Chakraborty, 2025. "Tariff, Wages and Compensation: A General Oligopolistic Equilibrium Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 11707, CESifo.
    4. Leone, Fabrizio, 2023. "Multinationals, robots and the labor share," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121330, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Thomas A. Gresik & Guttorm Schjelderup, 2024. "Transfer pricing under global adoption of destination-based cash-flow taxation," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(1), pages 243-261, February.
    6. Ferrando, Annalisa & McAdam, Peter & Petroulakis, Filippos & Vives, Xavier, 2021. "Product market structure and monetary policy: evidence from the Euro Area," Working Paper Series 2632, European Central Bank.
    7. Vives, Xavier & Vravosinos, Orestis, 2024. "Strategic complementarity in games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Dimitrakopoulou, Lydia & Genakos, Christos & Kampouris, Themistoklis & Papadokonstantaki, Stella, 2024. "VAT pass-through and competition: Evidence from the Greek islands," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Shubhdeep Deb & Jan Eeckhout & Aseem Patel & Lawrence Warren, 2024. "Walras–Bowley Lecture: Market Power and Wage Inequality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 92(3), pages 603-636, May.
    10. Moreno, Diego & Petrakis, Emmanuel, 2022. "On the General Equilibrium Effects of Market Power," UC3M Working papers. Economics 35529, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    11. Ruichang Lu & Qiaowei Shen & Tenghui Wang & Xiaojun Zhang, 2022. "Frenemies: Corporate Advertising Under Common Ownership," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4645-4669, June.
    12. Bartelsman, Eric & Dobbelaere, Sabien & Zona Mattioli, Alessandro, 2026. "Intangible Assets and Imperfections in Product and Labor Markets," IZA Discussion Papers 18440, IZA Network @ LISER.
    13. Márcio Marcelo Gross & Adriano Mendonça Souza, 2025. "Influence of Ownership Structure on the Debt Level and Efficiency of Electricity Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Tomas Gabriel Bas, 2025. "Globalization vs. Glocalization: Learn Lessons from Two Global Crises, Such as the Russia–Ukraine Conflict and the COVID-19 Pandemic, for the Agro-Food and Agro-Industrial Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-47, January.
    15. Loertscher, Simon & Muir, Ellen V., 2024. "Market power, randomization and regulation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. Hamid Beladi & Chi‐Chur Chao & Kuo‐Hsuan Chin, 2024. "Cross‐ownership, business dynamism, and wage inequality in general equilibrium," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 71(4), pages 570-587, September.
    17. Xu, Zhibo & Padmanabhan, Prasad & Huang, Chia-Hsing, 2025. "Does institutional cross-ownership reduce corporate shadow banking activities? Evidence from Chinese firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Brito, Duarte & Elhauge, Einer & Ribeiro, Ricardo & Vasconcelos, Helder, 2023. "Modelling the objective function of managers in the presence of overlapping shareholding," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Bustos, Emil, 2023. "The Effect of Centrally Bargained Wages on Firm Growth," Working Paper Series 1456, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    20. Da Gao & Linfang Tan & Yue Chen, 2025. "Smarter is greener: can intelligent manufacturing improve enterprises’ ESG performance?," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:234:y:2024:i:c:s0165176523005384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.