IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecanpo/v89y2026icp578-590.html

When lawsuits speak louder: Litigation risk and corporate financing constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Haiyan
  • Ma, Xiaoning
  • Lei, Xue
  • Jiang, Yu
  • Li, Yuan

Abstract

Lawsuits are often viewed as signals of operational problems, but their financial consequences may arise even when core business relationships remain stable. This study investigates how litigation risk affects firms’ financing conditions by focusing on its indirect revenue effects and the roles of investor sentiment and institutional context. Using panel data on Chinese A-share listed firms from 2007 to 2023 and employing fixed-effects and 2SLS models, the analysis finds that litigation risk tightens financing constraints mainly through revenue deterioration rather than structural changes in customer concentration. Investor sentiment shapes this relationship asymmetrically: optimistic sentiment dampens financing pressures, while pessimistic sentiment amplifies them. Investor attention weakens the negative effect by improving information transparency. Moreover, the impact is stronger in regions with more developed legal institutions. These results suggest that legal disputes influence financing less through direct operational disruption and more through how markets interpret legal signals, offering new insights into the interaction between legal events and financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Haiyan & Ma, Xiaoning & Lei, Xue & Jiang, Yu & Li, Yuan, 2026. "When lawsuits speak louder: Litigation risk and corporate financing constraints," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 578-590.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:578-590
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359262500503X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eap.2025.12.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:89:y:2026:i:c:p:578-590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/economic-analysis-and-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.