IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v52y2008i3p1533-1548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A simulation study comparing weighted estimating equations with multiple imputation based estimating equations for longitudinal binary data

Author

Listed:
  • Beunckens, Caroline
  • Sotto, Cristina
  • Molenberghs, Geert

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Beunckens, Caroline & Sotto, Cristina & Molenberghs, Geert, 2008. "A simulation study comparing weighted estimating equations with multiple imputation based estimating equations for longitudinal binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1533-1548, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:3:p:1533-1548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(07)00200-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James R. Carpenter & Michael G. Kenward & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2006. "A comparison of multiple imputation and doubly robust estimation for analyses with missing data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(3), pages 571-584, July.
    2. Joseph L. Schafer, 2003. "Multiple Imputation in Multivariate Problems When the Imputation and Analysis Models Differ," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 57(1), pages 19-35, February.
    3. D. R. Cox, 1972. "The Analysis of Multivariate Binary Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 21(2), pages 113-120, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruce J. Swihart & Brian S. Caffo & Ciprian M. Crainiceanu, 2014. "A Unifying Framework for Marginalised Random-Intercept Models of Correlated Binary Outcomes," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 275-295, August.
    2. Johan Verbeeck & Martin Geroldinger & Konstantin Thiel & Andrew Craig Hooker & Sebastian Ueckert & Mats Karlsson & Arne Cornelius Bathke & Johann Wolfgang Bauer & Geert Molenberghs & Georg Zimmermann, 2023. "How to analyze continuous and discrete repeated measures in small‐sample cross‐over trials?," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3998-4011, December.
    3. Stuart R. Lipsitz & Garrett M. Fitzmaurice & Roger D. Weiss, 2020. "Using Multiple Imputation with GEE with Non-monotone Missing Longitudinal Binary Outcomes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 890-904, December.
    4. Melanie Prague & Rui Wang & Alisa Stephens & Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen & Victor DeGruttola, 2016. "Accounting for interactions and complex inter‐subject dependency in estimating treatment effect in cluster‐randomized trials with missing outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1066-1077, December.
    5. G. Inan & R. Yucel, 2017. "Joint GEEs for multivariate correlated data with incomplete binary outcomes," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(11), pages 1920-1937, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christel Faes & Marc Aerts & Helena Geys & Geert Molenberghs, 2007. "Model Averaging Using Fractional Polynomials to Estimate a Safe Level of Exposure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 111-123, February.
    2. Robert D. J. Anderson, 2008. "US Consumer Inflation Expectations: Evidence Regarding Learning, Accuracy and Demographics," Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series 99, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    3. Creemers, An & Aerts, Marc & Hens, Niel & Molenberghs, Geert, 2012. "A nonparametric approach to weighted estimating equations for regression analysis with missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 100-113, January.
    4. Cheng, Hao, 2021. "Importance sampling imputation algorithms in quantile regression with their application in CGSS data," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 498-508.
    5. Kromidha, Endrit & Li, Matthew C., 2019. "Determinants of leadership in online social trading: A signaling theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 184-197.
    6. Kim, Chul & Jun, Duk Bin & Park, Sungho, 2018. "Capturing flexible correlations in multiple-discrete choice outcomes using copulas," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 34-59.
    7. Francesco Bartolucci & Claudia Pigini, 2018. "Partial effects estimation for fixed-effects logit panel data models," Working Papers 431, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    8. Richards, Timothy J. & Hamilton, Stephen F. & Yonezawa, Koichi, 2018. "Retail Market Power in a Shopping Basket Model of Supermarket Competition," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 328-342.
    9. Timothy Tyler Brown & Juan Pablo Atal, 2019. "How robust are reference pricing studies on outpatient medical procedures? Three different preprocessing techniques applied to difference‐in differences," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 280-298, February.
    10. L. Sun & M. K. Clayton, 2008. "Bayesian Analysis of Crossclassified Spatial Data with Autocorrelation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 74-84, March.
    11. Stuart R. Lipsitz & Garrett M. Fitzmaurice & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Debajyoti Sinha & Michael Parzen & Steven Lipshultz, 2009. "Joint generalized estimating equations for multivariate longitudinal binary outcomes with missing data: an application to acquired immune deficiency syndrome data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 3-20, January.
    12. Zhiwei Zhang & Zhen Chen & James F. Troendle & Jun Zhang, 2012. "Causal Inference on Quantiles with an Obstetric Application," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 697-706, September.
    13. Rakesh Niraj & V. Padmanabhan & P. B. Seetharaman, 2008. "Research Note—A Cross-Category Model of Households' Incidence and Quantity Decisions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 225-235, 03-04.
    14. Lingyun Lyu & Yu Cheng & Abdus S. Wahed, 2023. "Imputation‐based Q‐learning for optimizing dynamic treatment regimes with right‐censored survival outcome," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3676-3689, December.
    15. Brajendra C. Sutradhar, 2022. "Fixed versus Mixed Effects Based Marginal Models for Clustered Correlated Binary Data: an Overview on Advances and Challenges," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 259-302, May.
    16. Ferrari, Pier Alda & Annoni, Paola & Barbiero, Alessandro & Manzi, Giancarlo, 2011. "An imputation method for categorical variables with application to nonlinear principal component analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2410-2420, July.
    17. Sarah Mustillo, 2012. "The Effects of Auxiliary Variables on Coefficient Bias and Efficiency in Multiple Imputation," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(2), pages 335-361, May.
    18. Y. T. Hwang & C. H. Huang & W. L. Yeh & Y. D. Shen, 2017. "The weighted general linear model for longitudinal medical cost data – an application in colorectal cancer," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 288-307, January.
    19. Juan Aparicio & Jose M. Cordero & Lidia Ortiz, 2021. "Efficiency Analysis with Educational Data: How to Deal with Plausible Values from International Large-Scale Assessments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Francesco Bartolucci & Claudia Pigini, 2017. "Granger causality in dynamic binary short panel data models," Working Papers 421, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:52:y:2008:i:3:p:1533-1548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.