IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v201y2025ip2s0960077925012561.html

Strategic exploitation in Boltzmann Q-learning in the prisoners dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Leonidov, A.
  • Titov, A.
  • Vasilyeva, E.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning is one of the most promising techniques of uncovering near-optimal solutions in various domains of artificial intelligence. For the case of single-agent learning in stationary environment plentiful theoretical and empirical results are available in the literature. However, a consistent treatment of the case of multiagent learning appears to be one of central challenges in the field. The reason for such a difficulty is in the non-stationary nature of the multiagent learning process due to interrelated effects of agent’s decisions. A natural framework for describing interdependent decisions of agents is provided by game theory. In this study we apply two most popular reinforcement learning algorithms, SARSA and Q-learning, to the analysis of the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. The main focus is on studying the interplay between the exploration and strategic exploitation in the learning process. The exploration process is parametrised by the Boltzmann choice probabilities. The strategic exploitation is introduced through dependence on discounting parameter in stateless TD(1) SARSA and Q-learning algorithms. We describe three characteristics regimes corresponding to different combinations of exploration and strategic exploitation intensities. In particular, the domination of exploration process leads to the regime characterised by player’s policies fluctuating around quantal response equilibrium for the noisy Prisoner’s Dilemma. Domination of the strategic exploitation leads to an appearance of the strategic trap effect, when both players are for significant time locked in the state numerically indistinguishable from the Nash equilibrium in pure strategies in noiseless Prisoner’s dilemma. In case of moderate intensities of both exploration and exploitation processes the intermediate regime with periodically changing policies does appear.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonidov, A. & Titov, A. & Vasilyeva, E., 2025. "Strategic exploitation in Boltzmann Q-learning in the prisoners dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p2:s0960077925012561
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925012561
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young, H. Peyton, 2004. "Strategic Learning and its Limits," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199269181.
    2. J. M. Meylahn & L. Janssen, 2022. "Limiting Dynamics for Q‐Learning with Memory One in Symmetric Two‐Player, Two‐Action Games," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    3. J. M. Meylahn & L. Janssen & Hassan Zargarzadeh, 2022. "Limiting Dynamics for Q-Learning with Memory One in Symmetric Two-Player, Two-Action Games," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-20, November.
    4. Segismundo S. Izquierdo & Luis R. Izquierdo & Nicholas M. Gotts, 2008. "Reinforcement Learning Dynamics in Social Dilemmas," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(2), pages 1-1.
    5. Borgers, Tilman & Sarin, Rajiv, 1997. "Learning Through Reinforcement and Replicator Dynamics," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Usui, Yuki & Ueda, Masahiko, 2021. "Symmetric equilibrium of multi-agent reinforcement learning in repeated prisoner’s dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 409(C).
    7. Wolfram Barfuss & Janusz Meylahn, 2022. "Intrinsic fluctuations of reinforcement learning promote cooperation," Papers 2209.01013, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    8. Ding, Zhen-Wei & Zheng, Guo-Zhong & Cai, Chao-Ran & Cai, Wei-Ran & Chen, Li & Zhang, Ji-Qiang & Wang, Xu-Ming, 2023. "Emergence of cooperation in two-agent repeated games with reinforcement learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding, Zhen-Wei & Zheng, Guo-Zhong & Cai, Chao-Ran & Cai, Wei-Ran & Chen, Li & Zhang, Ji-Qiang & Wang, Xu-Ming, 2023. "Emergence of cooperation in two-agent repeated games with reinforcement learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    2. Benedikt V Meylahn & Janusz M Meylahn, 2024. "How social reinforcement learning can lead to metastable polarisation and the voter model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Xie, Kai & Szolnoki, Attila, 2026. "Reinforcement learning in evolutionary game theory: A brief review of recent developments," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 510(C).
    4. Jacques Durieu & Philippe Solal, 2012. "Models of Adaptive Learning in Game Theory," Chapters, in: Richard Arena & Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Dridi, Slimane & Lehmann, Laurent, 2014. "On learning dynamics underlying the evolution of learning rules," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 20-36.
    6. Cominetti, Roberto & Melo, Emerson & Sorin, Sylvain, 2010. "A payoff-based learning procedure and its application to traffic games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 71-83, September.
    7. Philippe Jehiel & Aviman Satpathy, 2024. "Coarse Q-learning: Indifference, Indeterminacy, and Instability," Papers 2412.09321, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    8. Antonio Cabrales & Rosemarie Nagel & Roc Armenter, 2007. "Equilibrium selection through incomplete information in coordination games: an experimental study," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(3), pages 221-234, September.
    9. Tom Johnston & Michael Savery & Alex Scott & Bassel Tarbush, 2023. "Game Connectivity and Adaptive Dynamics," Papers 2309.10609, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    10. Dehai Liu & Hongyi Li & Weiguo Wang & Chuang Zhou, 2015. "Scenario forecast model of long term trends in rural labor transfer based on evolutionary games," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 649-670, July.
    11. Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, 2017. "How regret moves individual and collective choices towards rationality," Chapters, in: Morris Altman (ed.), Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making, chapter 11, pages 188-204, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Georgios Piliouras & Ryann Sim & Stratis Skoulakis, 2021. "Beyond Time-Average Convergence: Near-Optimal Uncoupled Online Learning via Clairvoyant Multiplicative Weights Update," Papers 2111.14737, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    13. Ianni, A., 2002. "Reinforcement learning and the power law of practice: some analytical results," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 203, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    14. Philippe Jehiel, 2022. "Analogy-Based Expectation Equilibrium and Related Concepts:Theory, Applications, and Beyond," Working Papers halshs-03735680, HAL.
    15. Christian Ewerhart, 2020. "Ordinal potentials in smooth games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(4), pages 1069-1100, November.
    16. Benaïm, Michel & Hofbauer, Josef & Hopkins, Ed, 2009. "Learning in games with unstable equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(4), pages 1694-1709, July.
    17. Konstantinos Georgalos & Indrajit Ray & Sonali SenGupta, 2020. "Nash versus coarse correlation," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 1178-1204, December.
    18. Viossat, Yannick, 2008. "Evolutionary dynamics may eliminate all strategies used in correlated equilibrium," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 27-43, July.
    19. Antonio Morales, 2005. "On the Role of the Group Composition for Achieving Optimality," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 387-397, July.
    20. Gaunersdorfer, A. & Hommes, C.H. & Wagener, F.O.O., 2000. "Bifurcation Routes to Volatility Clustering," CeNDEF Working Papers 00-04, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:201:y:2025:i:p2:s0960077925012561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.