IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v68y2025i6p777-791.html

Turning accidents into advantages: An actionable framework for accidental corporate social responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Stephanie Lu
  • Sun, Jinyun
  • Schreck, Sydnie

Abstract

This article investigates the phenomenon of accidental corporate social responsibility (CSR), in which CSR initiatives emerge not from deliberate long-term planning but as spontaneous responses to unexpected events, public pressure, or crises. Building on the stakeholder governance framework, we propose an actionable framework to help firms identify, develop, and scale these unplanned yet impactful CSR efforts. Drawing on an 11-month ethnographic study of China’s food delivery industry, we examine how offline-to-online platform companies inadvertently supported the employment of hearing-impaired delivery workers. We trace how these reactive measures evolved into meaningful commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion. By shedding light on the mechanisms through which accidental CSR unfolds, this study offers practical guidance for managers to recognize and leverage emerging opportunities. Furthermore, the article underscores the importance of integrating marginalized groups into CSR strategies and calls for further research that offers actionable, evidence-based frameworks to guide inclusive and equitable corporate practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Stephanie Lu & Sun, Jinyun & Schreck, Sydnie, 2025. "Turning accidents into advantages: An actionable framework for accidental corporate social responsibility," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 777-791.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:6:p:777-791
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2025.07.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681325001168
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.07.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David C. Baldridge & Steven W. Floyd & Lívia Markóczy, 2004. "Are managers from Mars and academicians from venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(11), pages 1063-1074, November.
    2. Sophie Bacq & Ruth V. Aguilera, 2022. "Stakeholder Governance for Responsible Innovation: A Theory of Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 29-60, January.
    3. Aline Gatignon, 2022. "The double‐edged sword of boundary‐spanning Corporate Social Responsibility programs," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(10), pages 2156-2184, October.
    4. Anita M. McGahan, 2023. "The New Stakeholder Theory on Organizational Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 245-255, June.
    5. Yung-Ming Shiu & Shou-Lin Yang, 2017. "Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance-like effects?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 455-470, February.
    6. Benedict Sheehy, 2015. "Defining CSR: Problems and Solutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(3), pages 625-648, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Kaplan, 2023. "The Promises and Perils of Corporate Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 288-301, June.
    2. Junli Wang & Wendong Lv, 2023. "Research on the Impact of Green Innovation Network Embeddedness on Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Witold J. Henisz, 2023. "The Value of Organizational Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 159-169, June.
    4. Anita M. McGahan & Leandro S. Pongeluppe, 2023. "There Is No Planet B: Aligning Stakeholder Interests to Preserve the Amazon Rainforest," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7860-7881, December.
    5. Sergio G. Lazzarini, 2025. "The Strategic Imperative: Do We Need Normative Considerations in Strategic Theories of Stakeholder Engagement?," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 300-315, December.
    6. Zhou, Yuanyuan & Liu, Peng & Teng, Min, 2024. "The effects of host and home country economies on MNEs’ overseas CSR investment," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    7. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    8. Zhen Li & Yitong Sun & Jinhao Liu & Yi Li & Zhifang Zhou, 2024. "Corporate violations and bank debt cost: The insurance effect of corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4487-4503, September.
    9. Hongjin Zhu & Yue Pan & Jiaping Qiu & Jinli Xiao, 2022. "Hometown Ties and Favoritism in Chinese Corporations: Evidence from CEO Dismissals and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 283-310, March.
    10. Kalpana Tokas & Kartik Yadav, 2023. "Foreign Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of an Emerging Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(6), pages 1302-1325, December.
    11. Gu, Leilei & Liu, Zhongyang & Xu, Danyang, 2023. "The risk-mitigating role of corporate social responsibility in Chinese listed heavy-polluting companies: An extreme event experience perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    12. repec:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:1388-1409 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Estévez-Mendoza, Carlos & Montoro-Sánchez, Ángeles, 2024. "Exploring the relationship between innovation and corporate governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    14. Zhang, Kaixia & Li, Weibing, 2024. "Understanding the puzzle of polluting companies' social responsibility," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    15. Amrou Awaysheh & Randall A. Heron & Tod Perry & Jared I. Wilson, 2020. "On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 965-987, June.
    16. Awad, Mohamed Hassan, 2023. "Everything, all the time: Engaging the social problem of homelessness in entrepreneurship research and practice," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    17. Ariana Chang & Tian‐Shyug Lee & Hsiu‐Mei Lee, 2024. "Applying sustainable development goals in financial forecasting using machine learning techniques," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2277-2289, May.
    18. Kenneth de Roeck & Nicolas Raineri & David Jones & Sabrina Scheidler, 2024. "Giving the benefit of the doubt: Investigating the insurance-like effect of CSR in mitigating negative employee reactions to psychological contract breach," Post-Print hal-04238140, HAL.
    19. Rafia Afrin & Ni Peng & Frances Bowen, 2022. "The Wealth Effect of Corporate Water Actions: How Past Corporate Responsibility and Irresponsibility Influence Stock Market Reactions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 105-124, September.
    20. Olha Dmytrenko & Svitlana Viter, 2020. "Accounting & Analytical Aspects of Non-Financial Reporting Formation by Ukrainian Companies," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 18-28, June.
    21. Anita M. McGahan, 2023. "The New Stakeholder Theory on Organizational Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 245-255, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:6:p:777-791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.