IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v68y2025i3p351-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tackling gender disparity and achieving optimal distinctiveness in crowdfunding platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Chandna, Vallari
  • Axelton, Zhuoli

Abstract

Women entrepreneurs often encounter substantial obstacles when securing funding through crowdfunding platforms. These challenges include biases leading to funding failures, difficulties presenting and communicating their campaigns in funding-friendly formats, and a lack of strong social networks. Gender inequity in crowdfunding hinders the growth of women-led initiatives and stifles innovation and diversity in the entrepreneurial landscape. We explore the literature on crowdfunding digital platforms to shed light on the issues of gender equity regarding women entrepreneurs and propose strategies to address gender disparity in crowdfunding. More specifically, we use optimal distinctiveness theory as a foundation to propose that crowdfunding platform operators should find the best possible niche to appeal to an array of new investors while addressing gender disparity and empowering women entrepreneurs. Platforms can derive strategic advantages through distinctive value propositions that include gender-blind crowdfunding campaigns or a focus on campaign designing, thus ensuring fair evaluations based solely on project merit, which would likely foster inclusivity and equal opportunities. Crowdfunding platforms can also leverage unique offerings, such as becoming known for their network expansion support, dedicated training resources, or the highlighting of frequent funders of women-led campaigns, all of which helps level the playing field and obtaining a competitive advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandna, Vallari & Axelton, Zhuoli, 2025. "Tackling gender disparity and achieving optimal distinctiveness in crowdfunding platforms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 351-360.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:3:p:351-360
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2025.01.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681325000059
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.01.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:3:p:351-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.