IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v66y2023i1p65-73.html

An essential stupidity-based review of the Deepwater Horizon disaster

Author

Listed:
  • Sheppard, Jerry Paul
  • Young, Jesse

Abstract

Though more than a decade has passed, there are compelling reasons to revisit the Deepwater Horizon disaster, the most expensive nonnuclear industrial disaster in history. It serves as an exemplar of what organizations should not do. Recent tragedies in Nigeria and Florida also demonstrate how organizations might avoid the risk of being overtaken by readily predictable events. In this article, we look to advance research on risk mitigation and decision-making as we create a more succinct view of how managers create—and might prevent—inaptitude. To this end, we look at how the evolving concept of stupidity is defined in recent research and how it manifested in the critical case of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig. We present five proposals for organizations looking to address and avoid potentially unwise decisions that may lead to the next disaster.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheppard, Jerry Paul & Young, Jesse, 2023. "An essential stupidity-based review of the Deepwater Horizon disaster," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 65-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:66:y:2023:i:1:p:65-73
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2022.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681322000209
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Ocasio & Tomi Laamanen & Eero Vaara, 2018. "Communication and Attention Dynamics : an Attention-Based View of Strategic Change," Post-Print hal-02312047, HAL.
    2. William Ocasio & Tomi Laamanen & Eero Vaara, 2018. "Communication and attention dynamics: An attention‐based view of strategic change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 155-167, January.
    3. William Ocasio, 1997. "Towards An Attention‐Based View Of The Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 187-206, July.
    4. Mats Alvesson & André Spicer, 2012. "A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organizations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(7), pages 1194-1220, November.
    5. Sheppard, Jerry Paul & Young, Jesse, 2020. "Addressing sustainable development goals for confronting climate change: Insights and summary solutions in the stress stupidity system," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(6), pages 929-951, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yichen Wang & Christopher Marquis, 2025. "Does Product Market Competition Promote or Reduce Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility Behavior? How Stakeholder Attention Shapes Responsiveness to Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(4), pages 867-896, September.
    2. Angulo-Ruiz, Fernando & Pergelova, Albena & Dana, Leo Paul, 2020. "The internationalization of social hybrid firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 266-278.
    3. Datta, Subhadeep & Mukherjee, Sourjo, 2022. "In families we trust: Family firm branding and consumer’s reaction to product harm crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 257-268.
    4. Nguyen, Ha & Shirodkar, Vikrant, 2026. "Multinational enterprises’ subsidiary density and subsidiary survival: An attention-based perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
    5. Philip Mundlos, 2025. "The impact of artificial intelligence on managerial attention allocation for discontinuous change: a conceptual framework," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 1-45, June.
    6. Constance E. Helfat & Catherine A. Maritan, 2024. "Resource Allocation Capability and Routines in Multibusiness Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1110-1130, May.
    7. Matti Mäntymäki & Sami Hyrynsalmi & Antti Koskenvoima, 2020. "How Do Small and Medium-Sized Game Companies Use Analytics? An Attention-Based View of Game Analytics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1163-1178, October.
    8. Weiqi Dai & Mingqing Liao & Qiao Lin & Jincai Dong, 2022. "Does entrepreneurs’ proactive attention to government policies matter?," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 396-431, July.
    9. He, Qi & Wang, Chang & Deng, Chan & Zhou, Yifang, 2025. "Insisting or shifting technological trajectory? TMT attention and firms’ innovation responses to technology-forcing policy changes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Zhao, Shan & He, Xinming & Ma, Baichao & Zuo, Wenming, 2025. "Customer concentration, firm R&D investment and moderation effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    11. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Martin Ratzmann & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2023. "Fluffy cuffs: SME’s innovation in alliances with buyer firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1231-1251, October.
    12. Daniel A. Levinthal & Brian Wu, 2025. "Resource Redeployment and the Pursuit of the New Best Use: Economic Logic and Organizational Challenges," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 32-47, March.
    13. Sonal Kumar & Munish Kumar Thakur, 2025. "Attention dynamics: Evolution of attention-based view and its implications," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 3727-3772, December.
    14. Livieratos, Antonios D. & Tsekouras, George & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Angelakis, Antonios, 2022. "Open Innovation moves in SMEs: How European SMEs place their bets?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    15. Hou, Shaobo & Niu, Wenzheng & Chen, Baihe & Rong, Ke, 2026. "Industrial classification policy and its orientation on digital innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment and attention mechanisms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    16. Daniel Dongil Keum & Stephen Ryan, 2024. "Strategic Upward Striving Toward $100 Million Revenue: Setting Goals to Attract External Attention," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 974-993, May.
    17. Tomi Laamanen, 2019. "Dynamic attention-based view of corporate headquarters in MNCs," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Chao Wang & Jiapeng Li & Yang Yi & Shuwang Yang, 2024. "Crowding in or crowding out? Executive environmental attention and ESG performance of mining listed companies," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 37(4), pages 897-913, December.
    19. Daniella Laureiro-Martinez & Jose Pablo Arrieta & Stefano Brusoni, 2023. "Microfoundations of Problem Solving: Attentional Engagement Predicts Problem-Solving Strategies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 2207-2230, November.
    20. Kleinknecht, Robert & Haq, Hammad Ul & Muller, Alan R. & Kraan, Karolus O., 2020. "An attention-based view of short-termism: The effects of organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 244-254.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:66:y:2023:i:1:p:65-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.