IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Economic feasibility assessment of rice straw utilization for electricity generating through combustion in Thailand

Listed author(s):
  • Delivand, Mitra Kami
  • Barz, Mirko
  • Gheewala, Shabbir H.
  • Sajjakulnukit, Boonrod
Registered author(s):

    The economic feasibility of biomass based combustion projects of various capacities to generate electricity from rice straw is evaluated for Thailand. For an assumed lifespan of 20years, rice straw-fueled combustion facilities would generate Net Present Values (NPV) of −3.15, 0.94, 2.96, 9.33, and 18.79 million USD for projected 5, 8, 10, 15, and 20MWe plants, respectively. Examining the effects of scale on the cost of generated electricity (COE) over the considered range of capacities indicates that COE varies from 0.0676USD/kWh at 20MWe to 0.0899USD/kWh at 5MWe. By scaling up the power plants, the variations of the financial parameters, namely NPV values, become less sensitive to the critical variables. As an example, if the fuel price, selling price of electricity, and the plant factor change by +36% (31.0USD/t), −16% (0.0758USD/kWh), and −14% (5650h/yr), respectively, the largest scale project is still appealing for investment. Nevertheless, to ensure a secure fuel supply, smaller scale power plants, i.e., 8 and 10MWe may be more practicable. A further sensitivity analysis is discussed in terms of the financial feasibility of the projects (i.e., NPV⩾0), and the investment appraisal condition (here, Internal Rate of Return or IRR⩾11%).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Applied Energy.

    Volume (Year): 88 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 11 ()
    Pages: 3651-3658

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:11:p:3651-3658
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.001
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Bridgwater, A. V. & Toft, A. J. & Brammer, J. G., 2002. "A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 181-246, September.
    2. Delivand, Mitra Kami & Barz, Mirko & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2011. "Logistics cost analysis of rice straw for biomass power generation in Thailand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1435-1441.
    3. Boukis, Ioannis & Vassilakos, Nikos & Karellas, Sotirios & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2009. "Techno-economic analysis of the energy exploitation of biomass residues in Heraklion Prefecture--Crete," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 362-377, February.
    4. Junginger, Martin & de Visser, Erika & Hjort-Gregersen, Kurt & Koornneef, Joris & Raven, Rob & Faaij, Andre & Turkenburg, Wim, 2006. "Technological learning in bioenergy systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 4024-4041, December.
    5. Li, Hongtao & Marechal, Francois & Favrat, Daniel, 2010. "Power and cogeneration technology environomic performance typification in the context of CO2 abatement part I: Power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 3143-3154.
    6. Suramaythangkoor, Tritib & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2008. "Potential of practical implementation of rice straw-based power generation in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 3183-3187, August.
    7. Suramaythangkoor, Tritib & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2010. "Potential alternatives of heat and power technology application using rice straw in Thailand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 128-133, January.
    8. Liu, Wen & Lund, Henrik & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Zhang, Xiliang, 2011. "Potential of renewable energy systems in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 518-525, February.
    9. Zeng, Xianyang & Ma, Yitai & Ma, Lirong, 2007. "Utilization of straw in biomass energy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(5), pages 976-987, June.
    10. Yard, Stefan, 2000. "Developments of the payback method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 155-167, September.
    11. Li, Hongtao & Marechal, Francois & Favrat, Daniel, 2010. "Power and cogeneration technology environomic performance typification in the context of CO2 abatement part II: Combined heat and power cogeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3517-3523.
    12. Chau, J. & Sowlati, T. & Sokhansanj, S. & Preto, F. & Melin, S. & Bi, X., 2009. "Techno-economic analysis of wood biomass boilers for the greenhouse industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 364-371, March.
    13. Schmidt, Johannes & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Kindermann, Georg & Schmid, Erwin, 2010. "Cost-effective CO2 emission reduction through heat, power and biofuel production from woody biomass: A spatially explicit comparison of conversion technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2128-2141, July.
    14. Eriksson, Gunnar & Kjellström, Björn, 2010. "Assessment of combined heat and power (CHP) integrated with wood-based ethanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 3632-3641, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:11:p:3651-3658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.