IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v401y2025ipas0306261925014151.html

A calculation method enabling energy benchmarking in the pulp and paper industry: Adopting a methodology that bridge the research–policy implementation gap

Author

Listed:
  • Åkesson, Olof
  • Nyström, Kristina
  • Andersson, Elias
  • Thollander, Patrik

Abstract

Cross-site benchmarking could be an essential driver of energy efficiency in energy-intensive industries. However, no widely adopted, harmonized method for calculating energy performance currently exists for the pulp and paper sector. This study presents a novel calculation method developed through a transdisciplinary process involving the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, academic researchers, and pulp and paper mills. The method ensures a uniform representation of energy flows, enabling consistent and transparent comparisons across mills of similar types. It introduces a new benchmarking approach that disaggregates energy use into functional processes. Benchmarking energy performance at the level of functional processes enables meaningful comparisons between mills with different degrees of integration and production configurations, thus broadening the comparison pool in a heterogenic sector. Remaining site-specific variations, such as feedstock and paper quality, are addressed through the manual inclusion of explanatory metadata. The method aligns with the revised EU Industrial Emissions Directive's (IED) ambitions for decarbonization by dividing energy use into four separate energy carriers. It also supports energy based industrial symbiosis by subtracting externally utilized excess heat, and other energy resources, from total energy demand. Due to its institutional fit with the IED, the method has strong potential for EU-wide adoption. The co-creation process used to develop the method also offers a transferable framework for establishing energy benchmarks also in other energy-intensive sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Åkesson, Olof & Nyström, Kristina & Andersson, Elias & Thollander, Patrik, 2025. "A calculation method enabling energy benchmarking in the pulp and paper industry: Adopting a methodology that bridge the research–policy implementation gap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 401(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:401:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261925014151
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925014151
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnsson, Simon & Andrei, Mariana & Johansson, Maria, 2025. "Harmonizing energy audit reporting: Addressing data loss and policy challenges in the EU member states," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    2. Paramonova, Svetlana & Thollander, Patrik & Ottosson, Mikael, 2015. "Quantifying the extended energy efficiency gap-evidence from Swedish electricity-intensive industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 472-483.
    3. Matteo Piccioni & Fabrizio Martini & Chiara Martini & Claudia Toro, 2024. "Evaluation of Energy Performance Indicators and Energy Saving Opportunities for the Italian Rubber Manufacturing Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Klugman, Sofia & Karlsson, Magnus & Moshfegh, Bahram, 2007. "A Scandinavian chemical wood-pulp mill. Part 2. International and model mills comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 340-350, March.
    5. Solnørdal, Mette Talseth & Thyholdt, Sverre Braathen, 2019. "Absorptive capacity and energy efficiency in manufacturing firms – An empirical analysis in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 978-990.
    6. Arjunan, Pandarasamy & Poolla, Kameshwar & Miller, Clayton, 2020. "EnergyStar++: Towards more accurate and explanatory building energy benchmarking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Phylipsen, G. J. M. & Blok, K. & Worrell, E., 1997. "International comparisons of energy efficiency-Methodologies for the manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(7-9), pages 715-725.
    8. Park, Hyo Seon & Lee, Minhyun & Kang, Hyuna & Hong, Taehoon & Jeong, Jaewook, 2016. "Development of a new energy benchmark for improving the operational rating system of office buildings using various data-mining techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 225-237.
    9. Ke, Jing & Price, Lynn & McNeil, Michael & Khanna, Nina Zheng & Zhou, Nan, 2013. "Analysis and practices of energy benchmarking for industry from the perspective of systems engineering," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 32-44.
    10. Xu, Tengfang & Flapper, Joris & Kramer, Klaas Jan, 2009. "Characterization of energy use and performance of global cheese processing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1993-2000.
    11. Meyers, Steven & Schmitt, Bastian & Chester-Jones, Mae & Sturm, Barbara, 2016. "Energy efficiency, carbon emissions, and measures towards their improvement in the food and beverage sector for six European countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 266-283.
    12. Vaisi, Salah & Varmazyari, Pouya & Esfandiari, Masoud & Sharbaf, Sara A., 2023. "Developing a multi-level energy benchmarking and certification system for office buildings in a cold climate region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    13. Rogers, John Geoffrey & Cooper, Samuel J. & Norman, Jon B., 2018. "Uses of industrial energy benchmarking with reference to the pulp and paper industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 23-37.
    14. Jeong, Jaewook & Hong, Taehoon & Ji, Changyoon & Kim, Jimin & Lee, Minhyun & Jeong, Kwangbok, 2016. "Development of an integrated energy benchmark for a multi-family housing complex using district heating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1048-1061.
    15. Saygin, D. & Worrell, E. & Patel, M.K. & Gielen, D.J., 2011. "Benchmarking the energy use of energy-intensive industries in industrialized and in developing countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6661-6673.
    16. Attia, Shady & Evrard, Arnaud & Gratia, Elisabeth, 2012. "Development of benchmark models for the Egyptian residential buildings sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 270-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Ning & Wen, Zongguo & Liu, Mingqi & Guo, Jie, 2016. "Constructing an energy efficiency benchmarking system for coal production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 301-308.
    2. Li, Tian & Bie, Haipei & Lu, Yi & Sawyer, Azadeh Omidfar & Loftness, Vivian, 2024. "MEBA: AI-powered precise building monthly energy benchmarking approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    3. Akvile Lawrence & Patrik Thollander & Mariana Andrei & Magnus Karlsson, 2019. "Specific Energy Consumption/Use (SEC) in Energy Management for Improving Energy Efficiency in Industry: Meaning, Usage and Differences," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Zhou, Yuren & Lork, Clement & Li, Wen-Tai & Yuen, Chau & Keow, Yeong Ming, 2019. "Benchmarking air-conditioning energy performance of residential rooms based on regression and clustering techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Joakim Haraldsson & Simon Johnsson & Patrik Thollander & Magnus Wallén, 2021. "Taxonomy, Saving Potentials and Key Performance Indicators for Energy End-Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Aluminium Industry and Aluminium Casting Foundries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    6. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    7. Monjurul Hasan, A S M & Trianni, Andrea & Shukla, Nagesh & Katic, Mile, 2022. "A novel characterization based framework to incorporate industrial energy management services," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    8. Ke, Jing & Price, Lynn & McNeil, Michael & Khanna, Nina Zheng & Zhou, Nan, 2013. "Analysis and practices of energy benchmarking for industry from the perspective of systems engineering," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 32-44.
    9. Perroni, Marcos G. & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Vieira da Silva, Wesley & Tortato, Ubiratã, 2018. "Measuring energy performance: A process based approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 540-553.
    10. Bhadbhade, Navdeep & Yilmaz, Selin & Zuberi, Jibran S. & Eichhammer, Wolfgang & Patel, Martin K., 2020. "The evolution of energy efficiency in Switzerland in the period 2000–2016," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    11. Trianni, Andrea & Cagno, Enrico & Bertolotti, Matteo & Thollander, Patrik & Andersson, Elias, 2019. "Energy management: A practice-based assessment model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1614-1636.
    12. Cai, Wei & Wang, Lianguo & Li, Li & Xie, Jun & Jia, Shun & Zhang, Xugang & Jiang, Zhigang & Lai, Kee-hung, 2022. "A review on methods of energy performance improvement towards sustainable manufacturing from perspectives of energy monitoring, evaluation, optimization and benchmarking," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Giacone, E. & Mancò, S., 2012. "Energy efficiency measurement in industrial processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 331-345.
    14. Cai, Wei & Liu, Fei & Zhang, Hua & Liu, Peiji & Tuo, Junbo, 2017. "Development of dynamic energy benchmark for mass production in machining systems for energy management and energy-efficiency improvement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 715-725.
    15. Liu, Jiangyan & Chen, Huanxin & Liu, Jiahui & Li, Zhengfei & Huang, Ronggeng & Xing, Lu & Wang, Jiangyu & Li, Guannan, 2017. "An energy performance evaluation methodology for individual office building with dynamic energy benchmarks using limited information," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 193-205.
    16. Noor Jalo & Ida Johansson & Mariana Andrei & Therese Nehler & Patrik Thollander, 2021. "Barriers to and Drivers of Energy Management in Swedish SMEs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Attia, Shady & Shadmanfar, Niloufar & Ricci, Federico, 2020. "Developing two benchmark models for nearly zero energy schools," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    18. Jeong, Jaewook & Hong, Taehoon & Ji, Changyoon & Kim, Jimin & Lee, Minhyun & Jeong, Kwangbok & Koo, Choongwan, 2017. "Improvements of the operational rating system for existing residential buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 112-124.
    19. Marta Daroń & Monika Górska, 2023. "Relationships between Selected Quality Tools and Energy Efficiency in Production Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Liu, Jiangyan & Wang, Jiangyu & Li, Guannan & Chen, Huanxin & Shen, Limei & Xing, Lu, 2017. "Evaluation of the energy performance of variable refrigerant flow systems using dynamic energy benchmarks based on data mining techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 522-539.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:401:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261925014151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.