IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v385y2025ics0306261925002648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The importance of spatial resolution in large-scale, long-term planning models

Author

Listed:
  • Serpe, Louisa
  • Cole, Wesley
  • Sergi, Brian
  • Brown, Maxwell
  • Carag, Vincent
  • Karmakar, Akash

Abstract

Capacity expansion models are important tools for examining the evolution of the electric power sector. Embedded in these tools are many modeling choices with consequential impacts on computational burden and associated analysis. In this study, the spatial resolution of the national-scale Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) model is adjusted to understand the implications of higher-fidelity modeling on energy system projections and model solve times. The default ReEDS regions capture the contiguous United States in 134 balancing areas, while the regions in the higher resolution version are defined by more than 3000 U.S. counties. Using both resolutions, a case study is conducted in the United States for the Texas Interconnection (ERCOT) and the Western Interconnection (WI) to explore how differences in spatial resolution impact model projections and to inform appropriate applications of high spatial resolution in a large-scale capacity expansion model. In both interconnections, the higher spatial resolution model achieves a lower-cost solution, attributed to the more detailed representation of variable renewable resources and transmission. Shifts in land-based wind capacity between the balancing-area-level model and the county-level model are more prominent than the changes in solar, in part because of the heterogeneity of wind resource across the United States and the stronger dependency of wind on transmission. Furthermore, at higher spatial resolution there is a locational shift in the installed capacity toward regions characterized by resource profiles that are better aligned to contribute to resource adequacy. Beyond the nuances in the results, running the high-fidelity ReEDS model introduces a significant computational burden, with an order of magnitude increase in the number of model regions leading to at least an order of magnitude increase in the runtime. Spatial flexibility can offer users and developers the opportunity to perform high-fidelity analysis, however the benefits of high-resolution modeling must be weighed against the availability of the necessary data and the scope of the research question.

Suggested Citation

  • Serpe, Louisa & Cole, Wesley & Sergi, Brian & Brown, Maxwell & Carag, Vincent & Karmakar, Akash, 2025. "The importance of spatial resolution in large-scale, long-term planning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 385(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:385:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925002648
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925002648
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125534?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bistline, John & Santen, Nidhi & Young, David, 2019. "The economic geography of variable renewable energy and impacts of trade formulations for renewable mandates," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 79-96.
    2. Helm, Dieter, 2002. "Energy policy: security of supply, sustainability and competition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 173-184, February.
    3. Kailin Graham & Christopher R. Knittel, 2024. "Assessing the distribution of employment vulnerability to the energy transition using employment carbon footprints," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121(7), pages 2314773121-, February.
    4. Maxim, Alexandru, 2014. "Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 284-297.
    5. Gils, Hans Christian & Pregger, Thomas & Flachsbarth, Franziska & Jentsch, Mareike & Dierstein, Constantin, 2019. "Comparison of spatially and temporally resolved energy system models with a focus on Germany's future power supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Frysztacki, Martha Maria & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2023. "Inverse methods: How feasible are spatially low-resolved capacity expansion modelling results when disaggregated at high spatial resolution?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    7. Heuberger, Clara F. & Bains, Praveen K. & Mac Dowell, Niall, 2020. "The EV-olution of the power system: A spatio-temporal optimisation model to investigate the impact of electric vehicle deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    8. Klein, Sharon J.W. & Whalley, Stephanie, 2015. "Comparing the sustainability of U.S. electricity options through multi-criteria decision analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 127-149.
    9. Frysztacki, Martha Maria & Hörsch, Jonas & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2021. "The strong effect of network resolution on electricity system models with high shares of wind and solar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    10. Mai, Trieu & Bistline, John & Sun, Yinong & Cole, Wesley & Marcy, Cara & Namovicz, Chris & Young, David, 2018. "The role of input assumptions and model structures in projections of variable renewable energy: A multi-model perspective of the U.S. electricity system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 313-324.
    11. Frew, Bethany A. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2016. "Temporal and spatial tradeoffs in power system modeling with assumptions about storage: An application of the POWER model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P1), pages 198-213.
    12. Schlachtberger, D.P. & Brown, T. & Schramm, S. & Greiner, M., 2017. "The benefits of cooperation in a highly renewable European electricity network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 469-481.
    13. Guo, Zheng & Cheng, Rui & Xu, Zhaofeng & Liu, Pei & Wang, Zhe & Li, Zheng & Jones, Ian & Sun, Yong, 2017. "A multi-region load dispatch model for the long-term optimum planning of China’s electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 556-572.
    14. Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2015. "A multi-period, multi-regional generation expansion planning model incorporating unit commitment constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 310-331.
    15. Sanya Carley & David M. Konisky, 2020. "The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(8), pages 569-577, August.
    16. Sasse, Jan-Philipp & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2019. "Distributional trade-offs between regionally equitable and cost-efficient allocation of renewable electricity generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    17. Teagan Goforth & Destenie Nock, 2022. "Air pollution disparities and equality assessments of US national decarbonization strategies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Anthony Lopez & Wesley Cole & Brian Sergi & Aaron Levine & Jesse Carey & Cailee Mangan & Trieu Mai & Travis Williams & Pavlo Pinchuk & Jianyu Gu, 2023. "Impact of siting ordinances on land availability for wind and solar development," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(9), pages 1034-1043, September.
    19. Judy Jingwei Xie & Melissa Martin & Joeri Rogelj & Iain Staffell, 2023. "Distributional labour challenges and opportunities for decarbonizing the US power system," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(11), pages 1203-1212, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serrien, Floor & Meus, Jelle & Delarue, Erik, 2025. "Applicability of a flow-based grid representation in spatially resolved generation expansion planning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    2. Frysztacki, Martha Maria & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2023. "Inverse methods: How feasible are spatially low-resolved capacity expansion modelling results when disaggregated at high spatial resolution?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    3. Raventós, Oriol & Dengiz, Thomas & Medjroubi, Wided & Unaichi, Chinonso & Bruckmeier, Andreas & Finck, Rafael, 2022. "Comparison of different methods of spatial disaggregation of electricity generation and consumption time series," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Goforth, Teagan & Levin, Todd & Nock, Destenie, 2025. "Incorporating energy justice and equity objectives in power system models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    5. Prina, Matteo Giacomo & Nastasi, Benedetto & Groppi, Daniele & Misconel, Steffi & Garcia, Davide Astiaso & Sparber, Wolfram, 2022. "Comparison methods of energy system frameworks, models and scenario results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Mertens, Tim & Poncelet, Kris & Duerinck, Jan & Delarue, Erik, 2020. "Representing cross-border trade of electricity in long-term energy-system optimization models with a limited geographical scope," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    7. Onodera, Hiroaki & Delage, Rémi & Nakata, Toshihiko, 2024. "The role of regional renewable energy integration in electricity decarbonization—A case study of Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    8. Javanmardi, Komar & van der Hilst, Floor & Fattahi, Amir & Camargo, Luis Ramirez & Faaij, André, 2025. "Unraveling the spatial complexity of national energy system models: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Pratama, Yoga Wienda & Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu & Tezuka, Tetsuo & McLellan, Benjamin Craig & Hartono, Djoni & Hidayatno, Akhmad & Daud, Yunus, 2017. "Multi-objective optimization of a multiregional electricity system in an archipelagic state: The role of renewable energy in energy system sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 423-439.
    10. Teagan Goforth & Destenie Nock, 2022. "Air pollution disparities and equality assessments of US national decarbonization strategies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Heinisch, Verena & Dujardin, Jérôme & Gabrielli, Paolo & Jain, Pranjal & Lehning, Michael & Sansavini, Giovanni & Sasse, Jan-Philipp & Schaffner, Christian & Schwarz, Marius & Trutnevyte, Evelina, 2023. "Inter-comparison of spatial models for high shares of renewable electricity in Switzerland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    12. Simon, Emanuel & Schaeffer, Roberto & Szklo, Alexandre, 2025. "A solar and wind clustering framework with downscaling and bias correction of reanalysis data using singular value decomposition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    13. Bistline, John & Blanford, Geoffrey & Mai, Trieu & Merrick, James, 2021. "Modeling variable renewable energy and storage in the power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Reinert, Christiane & Nilges, Benedikt & Baumgärtner, Nils & Bardow, André, 2024. "This is SpArta: Rigorous Optimization of Regionally Resolved Energy Systems by Spatial Aggregation and Decomposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    15. Janicke, Lauren & Nock, Destenie & Surana, Kavita & Jordaan, Sarah M., 2023. "Air pollution co-benefits from strengthening electric transmission and distribution systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    16. Nock, Destenie & Baker, Erin, 2019. "Holistic multi-criteria decision analysis evaluation of sustainable electric generation portfolios: New England case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 655-673.
    17. Misconel, S. & Leisen, R. & Mikurda, J. & Zimmermann, F. & Fraunholz, C. & Fichtner, W. & Möst, D. & Weber, C., 2022. "Systematic comparison of high-resolution electricity system modeling approaches focusing on investment, dispatch and generation adequacy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    18. Tim H¨ofer & Rüdiger von Nitzsch & Reinhard Madlener, 2020. "Using Value-Focused Thinking and Multicriteria Decision Making to Evaluate Energy Transition Alternatives," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 330-355, December.
    19. Dranka, Géremi Gilson & Ferreira, Paula & Vaz, A. Ismael F., 2021. "A review of co-optimization approaches for operational and planning problems in the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    20. van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Torralba-Díaz, Laura & Bußar, Christian, 2022. "Impacts of power sector model features on optimal capacity expansion: A comparative study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:385:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925002648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.