IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v382y2025ics0306261924024590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle CO2e intensity of commercial aviation with specific sustainable aviation fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Bell, Aron
  • Mannion, Liam Anthony
  • Kelly, Mark
  • Ghaani, Mohammad Reza
  • Dooley, Stephen

Abstract

An original life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is developed to account the total carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions embodied in (i) specific hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) derived from used cooking oil, expressed in gCO2e/MJ and (ii) for the first time, the CO2e emissions of Aviation Activity, defined as the operation of a commercial flight and expressed in the industry standard reporting metrics of gCO2e per revenue-passenger-kilometre (gCO2e/RPK) and gCO2e per revenue-tonne-kilometre (gCO2e/RTK). The HEFA-SAF production is modelled to take place in Finland, while three locations of feedstock sourcing (Finland, Germany, and China), two hydrogen sources (grey and green hydrogen), and three energy sources (grid electricity, onsite wind electricity, and a mixture of 95 % natural gas and 5 % grid electricity) are analysed. The methodology employs actual aircraft flight data, thus accounting for operational detail of the specific Aviation Activity, such as mass of fuel used, aircraft type, and aircraft load factor. The CO2e emissions from Airport Operations are also included, comprising of non-fuel related activity that is necessary for the operation of the flight. The methodology is demonstrated on a specific real world Aviation Activity of a Ryanair flight from Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Netherlands to Dublin Airport, Ireland using Boeing 737–800 and 737 MAX 8 aircraft with varying blend fractions of the HEFA-SAF. The CO2e intensity of the HEFA-SAF is calculated to range from 2.9 to 22.1 gCO2e/MJ across all scenarios evaluated, representing a 76–97 % reduction in CO2e compared to the fossil aviation fuel baseline in a European context. It is shown that the well-to-wake CO2e intensity of the Aviation Activity is in the range of 117.8–96.6 gCO2e/RPK for the load factor range of 82–100 % when operated by a Boeing 737–800 with fossil aviation fuel. This is reduced by approximately 20 % to 93.8–77.1 gCO2e/RPK with the new generation Boeing 737 MAX 8. Finally, the use of the modelled HEFA-SAF at the current maximum 50 % blend fraction, operated with a Boeing 737 MAX 8 and 100 % load factor yields intensities of 48.0–39.8 gCO2e/RPK depending on the scenario details of the SAF. For the same scenario, the HEFA-SAF at 100 % blend fraction yields intensities of 2.5–18.9 gCO2e/RPK. A Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis shows that the CO2e intensity of the Aviation Activity is uncertain to approximately ±12 % due to uncertainties in input data and variabilities in the scenario specifics. The results of this LCA calculation highlight that specificity and rigorous supply chain analysis is crucial to the accurate determination of the life cycle CO2e that is embodied in SAF and emitted during Aviation Activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Bell, Aron & Mannion, Liam Anthony & Kelly, Mark & Ghaani, Mohammad Reza & Dooley, Stephen, 2025. "Life cycle CO2e intensity of commercial aviation with specific sustainable aviation fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0306261924024590
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924024590
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seber, Gonca & Escobar, Neus & Valin, Hugo & Malina, Robert, 2022. "Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of sustainable aviation fuels from vegetable oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Nugent, Daniel & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2014. "Assessing the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from solar PV and wind energy: A critical meta-survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 229-244.
    3. Mandegari, Mohsen & Ebadian, Mahmood & Saddler, Jack (John), 2023. "The need for effective life cycle assessment (LCA) to enhance the effectiveness of policies such as low carbon fuel standards (LCFS's)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Bartosz Gawron & Tomasz Białecki & Anna Janicka & Tomasz Suchocki, 2020. "Combustion and Emissions Characteristics of the Turbine Engine Fueled with HEFA Blends from Different Feedstocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, March.
    5. David Chiaramonti & Giacomo Talluri & George Vourliotakis & Lorenzo Testa & Matteo Prussi & Nicolae Scarlat, 2021. "Can Lower Carbon Aviation Fuels (LCAF) Really Complement Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) towards EU Aviation Decarbonization?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Ringsred, Anna & van Dyk, Susan & Saddler, John (Jack), 2021. "Life-cycle analysis of drop-in biojet fuel produced from British Columbia forest residues and wood pellets via fast-pyrolysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    7. Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem & Shah, Ajay, 2021. "Life cycle energy and environmental impacts of hydroprocessed renewable jet fuel production from pennycress," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    8. Vela-García, Nicolas & Bolonio, David & Mosquera, Ana María & Ortega, Marcelo F. & García-Martínez, María-Jesús & Canoira, Laureano, 2020. "Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of triisobutane production and its suitability as biojet fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    9. Liu, Xiao & Hang, Ye & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Flying into the future: A scenario-based analysis of carbon emissions from China's civil aviation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Keiser, Dennis & Schnoor, Lars Henrik & Pupkes, Birte & Freitag, Michael, 2023. "Life cycle assessment in aviation: A systematic literature review of applications, methodological approaches and challenges," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    11. Kocoloski, Matt & Mullins, Kimberley A. & Venkatesh, Aranya & Michael Griffin, W., 2013. "Addressing uncertainty in life-cycle carbon intensity in a national low-carbon fuel standard," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 41-50.
    12. Pereira, L.G. & Cavalett, O. & Bonomi, A. & Zhang, Y. & Warner, E. & Chum, H.L., 2019. "Comparison of biofuel life-cycle GHG emissions assessment tools: The case studies of ethanol produced from sugarcane, corn, and wheat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Moretti, Christian & Moro, Alberto & Edwards, Robert & Rocco, Matteo Vincenzo & Colombo, Emanuela, 2017. "Analysis of standard and innovative methods for allocating upstream and refinery GHG emissions to oil products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 372-381.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mandegari, Mohsen & Ebadian, Mahmood & Saddler, Jack (John), 2023. "The need for effective life cycle assessment (LCA) to enhance the effectiveness of policies such as low carbon fuel standards (LCFS's)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Akter, Hosne Ara & Masum, Farhad Hossain & Dwivedi, Puneet, 2024. "Life cycle emissions and unit production cost of sustainable aviation fuel from logging residues in Georgia, United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Rajanna, S. & Saini, R.P., 2016. "Modeling of integrated renewable energy system for electrification of a remote area in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 175-187.
    4. Canabarro, N.I. & Silva-Ortiz, P. & Nogueira, L.A.H. & Cantarella, H. & Maciel-Filho, R. & Souza, G.M., 2023. "Sustainability assessment of ethanol and biodiesel production in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Guatemala," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Danilo Arcentales-Bastidas & Carla Silva & Angel D. Ramirez, 2022. "The Environmental Profile of Ethanol Derived from Sugarcane in Ecuador: A Life Cycle Assessment Including the Effect of Cogeneration of Electricity in a Sugar Industrial Complex," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    6. Emblemsvåg, Jan, 2022. "Wind energy is not sustainable when balanced by fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    7. Kumar, Indraneel & Tyner, Wallace E. & Sinha, Kumares C., 2016. "Input–output life cycle environmental assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from utility scale wind energy in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 294-301.
    8. Zhang, Zumeng & Ding, Liping & Wang, Chaofan & Dai, Qiyao & Shi, Yin & Zhao, Yujia & Zhu, Yuxuan, 2022. "Do operation and maintenance contracts help photovoltaic poverty alleviation power stations perform better?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Liang, Yushi & Wu, Chunbing & Ji, Xiaodong & Zhang, Mulan & Li, Yiran & He, Jianjun & Qin, Zhiheng, 2022. "Estimation of the influences of spatiotemporal variations in air density on wind energy assessment in China based on deep neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    10. Chen, Dan & Yin, Jianan & Xu, Feng & Huang, Chen & Li, Ziyu, 2023. "A market-based framework for CO2 emissions reduction in China's civil aviation industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 150-158.
    11. Dixon, Christopher & Reynolds, Steve & Rodley, David, 2016. "Micro/small wind turbine power control for electrolysis applications," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 182-192.
    12. Lu, Qing & Yu, Hao & Zhao, Kangli & Leng, Yajun & Hou, Jianchao & Xie, Pinjie, 2019. "Residential demand response considering distributed PV consumption: A model based on China's PV policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 443-456.
    13. Xiao Liu & Yancai Zhang, 2023. "What drives the decoupling progress of China’s civil aviation transportation growth from carbon emissions? A new decomposition analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Bonou, Alexandra & Laurent, Alexis & Olsen, Stig I., 2016. "Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 327-337.
    15. Huang, Yumeng & Dai, Xingyu & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn, 2021. "A hybrid model for carbon price forecastingusing GARCH and long short-term memory network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    16. Nariê Rinke Dias de Souza & Bruno Colling Klein & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Otavio Cavalett & Antonio Bonomi, 2021. "Towards Comparable Carbon Credits: Harmonization of LCA Models of Cellulosic Biofuels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Squalli, Jay, 2017. "Renewable energy, coal as a baseload power source, and greenhouse gas emissions: Evidence from U.S. state-level data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 479-488.
    18. Huang, Jiangfeng & Khan, Muhammad Tahir & Perecin, Danilo & Coelho, Suani T. & Zhang, Muqing, 2020. "Sugarcane for bioethanol production: Potential of bagasse in Chinese perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    19. Remigiusz Jasiński & Paula Kurzawska & Radosław Przysowa, 2021. "Characterization of Particle Emissions from a DGEN 380 Small Turbofan Fueled with ATJ Blends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    20. Delfina Rogowska & Artur Wyrwa, 2021. "Analysis of the Potential for Reducing Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Motor Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0306261924024590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.