IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v371y2024ics0306261924010067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing the reliability trade-off in wildfires risk mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Khalili, Tohid
  • Davoudi, Masoud
  • Bidram, Ali

Abstract

One of the major concerns of electric power utilities in recent years is mitigating wildfire risks. While different mitigations have been proposed and some are implemented, customer experience is less focused in some methods, and not even considered in some extreme methods. This paper focuses on minimizing such tradeoff: reliability vs. wildfire risk reduction. This paper first proposes a methodology to quantify the wildfire risk raised by electric distribution systems, utilizing the vegetation factor at proper locations as well as the probability of fault. An optimization framework is then developed in this work that considers system reliability improvement in decision-making while reducing the risk of wildfires. The means to achieve such optimization are reclosers and fuses: optimally locate them to minimize the wildfire risk while the negative impact on reliability is minimized. Both fuse-blowing and saving schemes are investigated in this work. Moreover, the temporary and permanent types of faults are taken into account by formulating their impact on the operation of reclosers and fuses in both fuse-blowing and saving schemes. The optimization framework utilizes the exchange market algorithm (EMA) to find optimal results. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is verified by utilizing a modified IEEE 123 node system.

Suggested Citation

  • Khalili, Tohid & Davoudi, Masoud & Bidram, Ali, 2024. "Minimizing the reliability trade-off in wildfires risk mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:371:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924010067
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924010067
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:371:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924010067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.