IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v360y2024ics0306261924002186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis and multiobjective optimization for rural house retrofitting considering construction and occupant behavior uncertainty: A case study of Jiaxian, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Di
  • Zhang, Taoyuan
  • Zhang, Jiqiang
  • Lv, Hongyi
  • Yue, Chao
  • Fu, Mengze

Abstract

Due to their relatively low economic and technological level and unique life style, rural houses retrofits bear more uncertainties in construction and occupant behavior. However, these uncertainties for rural house retrofits have not yet been fully investigated, since previous studies have focused mostly on residential buildings or office buildings in urban areas. Therefore, to obtain more targeted and reliable analysis, a methodology that integrates the uncertainties of the construction structure, envelope retrofit construction and occupant behavior is proposed for rural house retrofits. First, the uncertain inputs are quantified through two global sensitivity analysis methods (SRC and TGP). Then, Pareto front solutions of envelope retrofit construction and occupant behavior are obtained for each typical structure through multiobjective optimization. Furthermore, the entropy weight method is used to analyze the Pareto front solutions, based on which the optimization objectives for different structures of rural houses are analyzed, and the optimal solutions are found. The methodology is applied to a case study of Jiaxian, which is a typical underdeveloped rural area in the hot-summer and cold-winter zone of China. The results of the global sensitivity analysis reveal that the three most sensitive factors affect approximately 80% to 98% of the uncertain outputs (discomfort hours and total energy consumption). The entropy weight results reveal that traditional timber-masonry house with pitched roof has a balanced emphasis optimizing both discomfort hours and total energy consumption, while brick-concrete house with flat roof reveals more discrepancy. The results of multiobjective optimization indicate significant energy-saving rate (45–68%), while the improvement in discomfort hours is relatively limited (6–13%). The results provide more reliable energy analysis results to correctly support rural retrofit design, and enlighten targeted retrofit strategies for different construction structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Di & Zhang, Taoyuan & Zhang, Jiqiang & Lv, Hongyi & Yue, Chao & Fu, Mengze, 2024. "Sensitivity analysis and multiobjective optimization for rural house retrofitting considering construction and occupant behavior uncertainty: A case study of Jiaxian, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:360:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924002186
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924002186
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122835?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:360:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924002186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.