IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v269y2020ics0306261920304621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value of closed-cycle gas turbines with design assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Kunniyoor, Vijayaraj
  • Singh, Punit
  • Nadella, Karthik

Abstract

Currently, there is considerable interest in the design and development of closed-cycle gas turbines to exploit its various advantages like heat source adaptability, fuel flexibility, compactness, etc. In the current context of depleting fossil fuels, there is an inevitable need to make use of renewable energy sources like solar energy. A detailed review of closed-cycle gas turbines is carried out in this paper. Three research gaps have been identified on closed-cycle gas turbines and are addressed. A thermodynamic analysis of a recuperated closed Brayton cycle with and without intercooling has been carried out with different working fluids to study their effect on cycle efficiency and net specific power. The analysis shows that supercritical carbon dioxide gives considerably higher efficiencies at mild turbine inlet temperatures of 400–700 °C. Helium can be considered at higher temperatures. The main objective of the current study is to survey closed-cycle gas turbine designs from literature and bring those designs with multiple fluids on to one platform: in the form of two unique charts which can be used as turbomachinery design assessment tools for different closed-cycle gas turbine working fluids. Enthalpy-mass flow rate-diameter chart is created for the compressors and turbines, clearly showing the zones of various working fluids at a glance. The specific speed and specific diameter values are calculated for the turbomachinery designs of different working fluids, and the selected values are superimposed on the Balje’s specific speed- specific diameter charts to see their regimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kunniyoor, Vijayaraj & Singh, Punit & Nadella, Karthik, 2020. "Value of closed-cycle gas turbines with design assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:269:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920304621
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920304621
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peinado Gonzalo, Alfredo & Pliego Marugán, Alberto & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro, 2019. "A review of the application performances of concentrated solar power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. Toro, Claudia & Lior, Noam, 2017. "Analysis and comparison of solar-heat driven Stirling, Brayton and Rankine cycles for space power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 549-564.
    3. Rovira, Antonio & Rubbia, Carlo & Valdés, Manuel & Martínez-Val, José M., 2014. "Thermodynamic cycles optimised for medium enthalpy units of concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 176-185.
    4. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Asfand, Faisal & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2019. "Thermal performance and economic analysis of supercritical Carbon Dioxide cycles in combined cycle power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Al-attab, K.A. & Zainal, Z.A., 2015. "Externally fired gas turbine technology: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 474-487.
    6. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Kelsall, Greg, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and preliminary design of closed Brayton cycle using nitrogen as working fluid and coupled to small modular Sodium-cooled fast reactor (SM-SFR)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 436-453.
    7. Luu, Minh Tri & Milani, Dia & McNaughton, Robbie & Abbas, Ali, 2017. "Analysis for flexible operation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with solar thermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 752-771.
    8. Ahn, Yoonhan & Lee, Jekyoung & Kim, Seong Gu & Lee, Jeong Ik & Cha, Jae Eun & Lee, Si-Woo, 2015. "Design consideration of supercritical CO2 power cycle integral experiment loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 115-127.
    9. Rovira, Antonio & Muñoz, Marta & Sánchez, Consuelo & Martínez-Val, José María, 2015. "Proposal and study of a balanced hybrid Rankine–Brayton cycle for low-to-moderate temperature solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 305-317.
    10. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.
    11. Bijarniya, Jay Prakash & Sudhakar, K. & Baredar, Prashant, 2016. "Concentrated solar power technology in India: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 593-603.
    12. Locatelli, Giorgio & Mancini, Mauro & Todeschini, Nicola, 2013. "Generation IV nuclear reactors: Current status and future prospects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1503-1520.
    13. Johansson, Viktor & Lehtveer, Mariliis & Göransson, Lisa, 2019. "Biomass in the electricity system: A complement to variable renewables or a source of negative emissions?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 532-541.
    14. Binotti, Marco & Astolfi, Marco & Campanari, Stefano & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Silva, Paolo, 2017. "Preliminary assessment of sCO2 cycles for power generation in CSP solar tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1007-1017.
    15. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    16. Zhu, Han-Hui & Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis and comparison for different direct-heated supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated into a solar thermal power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 144-157.
    17. Liu, Yaping & Wang, Ying & Huang, Diangui, 2019. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    18. Franco, Alessandro & Diaz, Ana R., 2009. "The future challenges for “clean coal technologies”: Joining efficiency increase and pollutant emission control," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 348-354.
    19. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    20. Bennett, Jeffrey A. & Fuhrman, Jay & Brown, Tyler & Andrews, Nathan & Fittro, Roger & Clarens, Andres F., 2019. "Feasibility of Using sCO2 Turbines to Balance Load in Power Grids with a High Deployment of Solar Generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 548-560.
    21. Santini, Lorenzo & Accornero, Carlo & Cioncolini, Andrea, 2016. "On the adoption of carbon dioxide thermodynamic cycles for nuclear power conversion: A case study applied to Mochovce 3 Nuclear Power Plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 446-463.
    22. Uusitalo, Antti & Ameli, Alireza & Turunen-Saaresti, Teemu, 2019. "Thermodynamic and turbomachinery design analysis of supercritical Brayton cycles for exhaust gas heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 60-79.
    23. Wang, Xiaohe & Liu, Qibin & Bai, Zhang & Lei, Jing & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "Thermodynamic investigations of the supercritical CO2 system with solar energy and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 108-118.
    24. Xu, Xinhai & Vignarooban, K. & Xu, Ben & Hsu, K. & Kannan, A.M., 2016. "Prospects and problems of concentrating solar power technologies for power generation in the desert regions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1106-1131.
    25. Sun, Yubiao & Duniam, Sam & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Dong, Peixin & Wang, Jianyong & Hooman, Kamel, 2019. "Coupling supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle with spray-assisted dry cooling technology for concentrated solar power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    26. Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. & Atif, Maimoon, 2015. "Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 61-71.
    27. Islam, Md Tasbirul & Huda, Nazmul & Abdullah, A.B. & Saidur, R., 2018. "A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Current status and research trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 987-1018.
    28. Mecheri, Mounir & Le Moullec, Yann, 2016. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for coal-fired power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 758-771.
    29. Dunham, Marc T. & Iverson, Brian D., 2014. "High-efficiency thermodynamic power cycles for concentrated solar power systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 758-770.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krzysztof Kosowski & Marian Piwowarski, 2020. "Design Analysis of Micro Gas Turbines in Closed Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Zhang, Weihao & Deng, Ji & Wang, Penghui & Wang, Yufan, 2023. "Study on similitude method for turbine considering working fluid physical properties variation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    3. Xu, Chi & Kong, Fanli & Yu, Dali & Yu, Jie & Khan, Muhammad Salman, 2021. "Influence of non-ideal gas characteristics on working fluid properties and thermal cycle of space nuclear power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Vedran Mrzljak & Igor Poljak & Maro Jelić & Jasna Prpić-Oršić, 2023. "Thermodynamic Analysis and Improvement Potential of Helium Closed Cycle Gas Turbine Power Plant at Four Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib & Ahmed, Samer & Kapat, Jayanta, 2021. "Direct-fired oxy-combustion supercritical-CO2 power cycle with novel preheating configurations -thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    4. Muhammad, Hafiz Ali & Cho, Junhyun & Cho, Jongjae & Choi, Bongsu & Roh, Chulwoo & Ishfaq, Hafiz Ahmad & Lee, Gilbong & Shin, Hyungki & Baik, Young-Jin & Lee, Beomjoon, 2022. "Performance improvement of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle at elevated heat sink temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    5. Guo, Jia-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Yan, Jun-Jie & Wang, Kun, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance analysis of different supercritical Brayton cycles using CO2-based binary mixtures in the molten salt solar power tower systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 785-798.
    6. Kim, Sunjin & Kim, Min Soo & Kim, Minsung, 2020. "Parametric study and optimization of closed Brayton power cycle considering the charge amount of working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.
    8. Duniam, Sam & Veeraragavan, Ananthanarayanan, 2019. "Off-design performance of the supercritical carbon dioxide recompression Brayton cycle with NDDCT cooling for concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    11. Xiao, Tingyu & Liu, Chao & Wang, Xurong & Wang, Shukun & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Qibin & Li, Xiaoxiao, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of the solar thermal power plant integrated with air-cooled supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 119-133.
    12. Ehsan, M. Monjurul & Guan, Zhiqiang & Gurgenci, Hal & Klimenko, Alexander, 2020. "Feasibility of dry cooling in supercritical CO2 power cycle in concentrated solar power application: Review and a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. Park, Joo Hyun & Park, Hyun Sun & Kwon, Jin Gyu & Kim, Tae Ho & Kim, Moo Hwan, 2018. "Optimization and thermodynamic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton recompression cycle for various small modular reactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 520-535.
    14. Penkuhn, Mathias & Tsatsaronis, George, 2020. "Systematic evaluation of efficiency improvement options for sCO2 Brayton cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    15. Gu, Mingyan & Wang, Mingming & Chen, Xue & Wang, Jimin & Lin, Yuyu & Chu, Huaqiang, 2019. "Numerical study on the effect of separated over-fire air ratio on combustion characteristics and NOx emission in a 1000 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 593-603.
    16. Ma, Teng & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Cao, Feng, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis and performance prediction on dynamic response characteristic of PCHE in 1000 MW S-CO2 coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 123-138.
    17. Marta Muñoz & Antonio Rovira & María José Montes, 2022. "Thermodynamic cycles for solar thermal power plants: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), March.
    18. Li, Zhaozhi & Shao, Yingjuan & Zhong, Wenqi & Liu, Hao, 2023. "Optimal design and thermodynamic evaluation of supercritical CO2 oxy-coal circulating fluidized bed power generation systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    19. Xu, Cheng & Zhang, Qiang & Yang, Zhiping & Li, Xiaosa & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "An improved supercritical coal-fired power generation system incorporating a supplementary supercritical CO2 cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1319-1329.
    20. Song, Jian & Wang, Yaxiong & Wang, Kai & Wang, Jiangfeng & Markides, Christos N., 2021. "Combined supercritical CO2 (SCO2) cycle and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for hybrid solar and geothermal power generation: Thermoeconomic assessment of various configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1020-1035.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:269:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920304621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.