IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v175y2019icp593-603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical study on the effect of separated over-fire air ratio on combustion characteristics and NOx emission in a 1000 MW supercritical CO2 boiler

Author

Listed:
  • Gu, Mingyan
  • Wang, Mingming
  • Chen, Xue
  • Wang, Jimin
  • Lin, Yuyu
  • Chu, Huaqiang

Abstract

As an advanced power generation system, supercritical CO2 (S-CO2) coal fired power plant has advantages of high electric efficient and compact system layout. In this paper, the coal combustion characteristics and NOx formation in coal-fired S-CO2 boiler has been explored by numerical simulation. The boiler wall temperature distributions were determined according to the 1/8 partial flow strategy for S-CO2 coal-fired power plant. The effect of SOFA ratio on the gas flow field, the gas temperature, the species concentration including NOx distribution was investigated. The results show that the SOFA ratio has a great influence on the coal combustion process and NOx formation. With the increase of SOFA ratio, the O2 concentration decreases in the main coal burning zone, a higher CO concentration can be found. A lower gas temperature zone in the main burning zone and a lower NOx emission near the furnace outlet can also be observed with a higher SOFA ratio. The results presented promote a better understanding of the NOx formation characteristics and would be benefit for the NOx control in coal-fired S-CO2 boiler.

Suggested Citation

  • Gu, Mingyan & Wang, Mingming & Chen, Xue & Wang, Jimin & Lin, Yuyu & Chu, Huaqiang, 2019. "Numerical study on the effect of separated over-fire air ratio on combustion characteristics and NOx emission in a 1000 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 593-603.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:175:y:2019:i:c:p:593-603
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219305110
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bai, Ziwei & Zhang, Guoqiang & Li, Yongyi & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "A supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with a bleeding anabranch used in coal-fired power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 731-738.
    2. Crespi, Francesco & Gavagnin, Giacomo & Sánchez, David & Martínez, Gonzalo S., 2017. "Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 152-183.
    3. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    4. Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Han, Wanlong & Bai, Wengang & Yang, Yu & Yao, Mingyu & Wang, Yueming, 2018. "Improved design of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle for coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Al-attab, K.A. & Zainal, Z.A., 2015. "Externally fired gas turbine technology: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 474-487.
    6. Le Moullec, Yann, 2013. "Conceptual study of a high efficiency coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 32-46.
    7. Ahn, Yoonhan & Lee, Jekyoung & Kim, Seong Gu & Lee, Jeong Ik & Cha, Jae Eun & Lee, Si-Woo, 2015. "Design consideration of supercritical CO2 power cycle integral experiment loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 115-127.
    8. Fan, Weidong & Li, Yu & Guo, Qinghong & Chen, Can & Wang, Yong, 2017. "Coal-nitrogen release and NOx evolution in the oxidant-staged combustion of coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 417-426.
    9. Ti, Shuguang & Chen, Zhichao & Li, Zhengqi & Xie, Yiquan & Shao, Yunlin & Zong, Qiudong & Zhang, Qinghua & Zhang, Hao & Zeng, Lingyan & Zhu, Qunyi, 2014. "Influence of different swirl vane angles of over fire air on flow and combustion characteristics and NOx emissions in a 600 MWe utility boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 775-787.
    10. Fan, Weidong & Lin, Zhengchun & Li, Youyi & Zhang, Mingchuan, 2010. "Experimental flow field characteristics of OFA for large-angle counter flow of fuel-rich jet combustion technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2737-2745, August.
    11. Mecheri, Mounir & Le Moullec, Yann, 2016. "Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for coal-fired power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 758-771.
    12. Orozco, Dimas José Rúa & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos & del Olmo, Oscar Almazán, 2017. "A new methodology of thermodynamic diagnosis, using the thermoeconomic method together with an artificial neural network (ANN): A case study of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 20-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fan, Y.H. & Yang, D.L. & Tang, G.H. & Sheng, Q. & Li, X.L., 2022. "Design of S–CO2 coal-fired power system based on the multiscale analysis platform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Wang, Yanhong & Li, Xiaoyu & Mao, Tianqin & Hu, Pengfei & Li, Xingcan & GuanWang,, 2022. "Mechanism modeling of optimal excess air coefficient for operating in coal fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    3. Zhou, Jing & Zhu, Meng & Xu, Kai & Su, Sheng & Tang, Yifang & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Xu, Jun & He, Limo & Xiang, Jun, 2020. "Key issues and innovative double-tangential circular boiler configurations for the 1000 MW coal-fired supercritical carbon dioxide power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Zhou, Jing & Zhu, Meng & Su, Sheng & Chen, Lei & Xu, Jun & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Jiang, Long & Zhong, Wenqi & Xiang, Jun, 2020. "Numerical analysis and modified thermodynamic calculation methods for the furnace in the 1000 MW supercritical CO2 coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Darbandi, Masoud & Fatin, Ali & Bordbar, Hadi, 2020. "Numerical study on NOx reduction in a large-scale heavy fuel oil-fired boiler using suitable burner adjustments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    6. Choi, Minsung & Park, Yeseul & Li, Xinzhuo & Kim, Kibeom & Sung, Yonmo & Hwang, Taegam & Choi, Gyungmin, 2021. "Numerical evaluation of pulverized coal swirling flames and NOx emissions in a coal-fired boiler: Effects of co- and counter-swirling flames and coal injection modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    7. Zhu, Meng & Zhou, Jing & Chen, Lei & Su, Sheng & Hu, Song & Qing, Haoran & Li, Aishu & Wang, Yi & Zhong, Wenqi & Xiang, Jun, 2022. "Economic analysis and cost modeling of supercritical CO2 coal-fired boiler based on global optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    8. Choi, Minsung & Hwang, Taegam & Park, Yeseul & Li, Xinzhuo & Kim, Junsung & Kim, Kibeom & Sung, Yonmo & Choi, Gyungmin, 2023. "Numerical evaluation of the effect of swirl configuration and fuel-rich environment on combustion and emission characteristics in a coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zhaozhi & Shao, Yingjuan & Zhong, Wenqi & Liu, Hao, 2023. "Optimal design and thermodynamic evaluation of supercritical CO2 oxy-coal circulating fluidized bed power generation systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Xu, Cheng & Zhang, Qiang & Yang, Zhiping & Li, Xiaosa & Xu, Gang & Yang, Yongping, 2018. "An improved supercritical coal-fired power generation system incorporating a supplementary supercritical CO2 cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1319-1329.
    3. Liu, Xuejiao & Zhong, Wenqi & Li, Pingjiao & Xiang, Jun & Liu, Guoyao, 2019. "Design and performance analysis of coal-fired fluidized bed for supercritical CO2 power cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 468-478.
    4. Wang, Shengpeng & Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Yao, Mingyu & Peng, Botao & Yan, Junjie, 2020. "Thermohydrodynamic analysis of the vertical gas wall and reheat gas wall in a 300 MW supercritical CO2 boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Yang, D.L. & Tang, G.H. & Fan, Y.H. & Li, X.L. & Wang, S.Q., 2020. "Arrangement and three-dimensional analysis of cooling wall in 1000 MW S–CO2 coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Yifan & Yao, Mingyu & Yang, Yu & Han, Wanlong & Bai, Wengang, 2019. "Design assessment of a 5 MW fossil-fired supercritical CO2 power cycle pilot loop," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 792-804.
    7. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Lei & Zhang, Yifan & Yang, Yu & Zhang, Chun & Yao, Mingyu, 2021. "Energy and exergy analyses of an improved recompression supercritical CO2 cycle for coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Kunniyoor, Vijayaraj & Singh, Punit & Nadella, Karthik, 2020. "Value of closed-cycle gas turbines with design assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    9. Luo, Kun & Zhao, Chunguang & Wen, Xu & Gao, Zhengwei & Bai, Yun & Xing, Jiangkuan & Fan, Jianren, 2019. "A priori study of an extended flamelet/progress variable model for NO prediction in pulverized coal flames," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 768-780.
    10. Tong, Yongjing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Ming & Pang, Liping, 2022. "Design optimization of a new supercritical CO2 single reheat coal-fired power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Zhang, Xuelei & Zhang, Zhuoyuan & Wang, Gaofeng, 2023. "Thermodynamic and economic investigation of a novel combined cycle in coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture via Ca-looping," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    12. Xu, Jinliang & Sun, Enhui & Li, Mingjia & Liu, Huan & Zhu, Bingguo, 2018. "Key issues and solution strategies for supercritical carbon dioxide coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 227-246.
    13. Fan, Y.H. & Yang, D.L. & Tang, G.H. & Sheng, Q. & Li, X.L., 2022. "Design of S–CO2 coal-fired power system based on the multiscale analysis platform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    14. Zhou, Jing & Zhu, Meng & Su, Sheng & Chen, Lei & Xu, Jun & Hu, Song & Wang, Yi & Jiang, Long & Zhong, Wenqi & Xiang, Jun, 2020. "Numerical analysis and modified thermodynamic calculation methods for the furnace in the 1000 MW supercritical CO2 coal-fired boiler," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    15. Olumayegun, Olumide & Wang, Meihong & Oko, Eni, 2019. "Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1074-1088.
    16. Gao, Lei & Cao, Tao & Hwang, Yunho & Radermacher, Reinhard, 2022. "Robustness analysis in supercritical CO2 power generation system configuration optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    17. Ma, Teng & Li, Ming-Jia & Xu, Jin-Liang & Cao, Feng, 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis and performance prediction on dynamic response characteristic of PCHE in 1000 MW S-CO2 coal fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 123-138.
    18. Chen, Zhewen & Wang, Yanjuan & Zhang, Xiaosong & Xu, Jinliang, 2020. "The energy-saving mechanism of coal-fired power plant with S–CO2 cycle compared to steam-Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Yang, D.L. & Tang, G.H. & Li, X.L. & Fan, Y.H., 2022. "Capacity-dependent configurations of S–CO2 coal-fired boiler by overall analysis with a unified model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    20. Linares, José Ignacio & Cantizano, Alexis & Arenas, Eva & Moratilla, Beatriz Yolanda & Martín-Palacios, Víctor & Batet, Lluis, 2017. "Recuperated versus single-recuperator re-compressed supercritical CO2 Brayton power cycles for DEMO fusion reactor based on dual coolant lithium lead blanket," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 307-317.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:175:y:2019:i:c:p:593-603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.