IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v267y2020ics0306261920303809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robustness-based decision making approach for multi-target high performance buildings under uncertain scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Homaei, Shabnam
  • Hamdy, Mohamed

Abstract

Considering the diverse uncertainties in building operations and external factors (i.e., occupancy and weather scenarios that can impact a building’s energy and comfort), performance robustness has become as important as the building performance itself. Selecting a robust and high performance building design is challenging, particularly when multiple performance criteria should be fulfilled. It requires performance evaluation, robustness assessment, and multi-criteria decision making in three sequential steps. The current study introduces a new robustness-based decision making approach that integrates the robustness assessment and decision making steps and is more transparent than previously used approaches. The proposed approach normalizes each objective function based on its defined target and combines them into one comprehensive indicator. Moreover, it penalizes solutions that do not meet the targeted margins. The new approach is tested on a case study of a single-family house, where eight competitive designs and 16 occupant and climate scenarios are investigated. Exhaustive searches and sophisticated engineering analysis are applied to validate the logic behind the approach’s results. In addition, a test framework is used to validate the reliability of the approach under different combinations of scenarios. The results show that the proposed approach can select a high performance and robust building design simultaneously with less analysis effort (no need for weighting the objectives nor for conducting a robustness analysis for each objective separately) and with much trustworthy rate (selecting solution in comparison to the defined targets and with less dependency on the scenario conditions) compared to one frequently used approach (i.e., the Hurwicz criterion).

Suggested Citation

  • Homaei, Shabnam & Hamdy, Mohamed, 2020. "A robustness-based decision making approach for multi-target high performance buildings under uncertain scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:267:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920303809
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920303809
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mavrotas, George & Figueira, José Rui & Siskos, Eleftherios, 2015. "Robustness analysis methodology for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems and application to project selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 142-155.
    2. Thomas, Dimitrios & Deblecker, Olivier & Ioakimidis, Christos S., 2018. "Optimal operation of an energy management system for a grid-connected smart building considering photovoltaics’ uncertainty and stochastic electric vehicles’ driving schedule," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1188-1206.
    3. Nord, Natasa & Qvistgaard, Live Holmedal & Cao, Guangyu, 2016. "Identifying key design parameters of the integrated energy system for a residential Zero Emission Building in Norway," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P3), pages 1076-1087.
    4. Gang, Wenjie & Wang, Shengwei & Xiao, Fu & Gao, Dian-ce, 2015. "Robust optimal design of building cooling systems considering cooling load uncertainty and equipment reliability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 265-275.
    5. Pohekar, S. D. & Ramachandran, M., 2004. "Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 365-381, August.
    6. Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei & Tang, Rui, 2019. "Robust optimal design of zero/low energy buildings considering uncertainties and the impacts of objective functions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    7. Kotireddy, Rajesh & Hoes, Pieter-Jan & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2018. "A methodology for performance robustness assessment of low-energy buildings using scenario analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 428-442.
    8. Yang, Kun & Zhu, Neng & Chang, Chen & Wang, Daquan & Yang, Shan & Ma, Shengming, 2018. "A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM): A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1085-1096.
    9. Peeters, Leen & Dear, Richard de & Hensen, Jan & D'haeseleer, William, 2009. "Thermal comfort in residential buildings: Comfort values and scales for building energy simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(5), pages 772-780, May.
    10. Richard H. Moss & Jae A. Edmonds & Kathy A. Hibbard & Martin R. Manning & Steven K. Rose & Detlef P. van Vuuren & Timothy R. Carter & Seita Emori & Mikiko Kainuma & Tom Kram & Gerald A. Meehl & John F, 2010. "The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7282), pages 747-756, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. António M. Raimundo & Nuno Baía Saraiva & Luisa Dias Pereira & Ana Cristina Rebelo, 2021. "Market-Oriented Cost-Effectiveness and Energy Analysis of Windows in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Shabnam Homaei & Mohamed Hamdy, 2021. "Quantification of Energy Flexibility and Survivability of All-Electric Buildings with Cost-Effective Battery Size: Methodology and Indexes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-32, May.
    3. Seyed Morteza Moghimi & Thomas Aaron Gulliver & Ilamparithi Thirumai Chelvan, 2024. "Energy Management in Modern Buildings Based on Demand Prediction and Machine Learning—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Roberta Moschetti & Shabnam Homaei & Ellika Taveres-Cachat & Steinar Grynning, 2022. "Assessing Responsive Building Envelope Designs through Robustness-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Zero-Emission Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    5. Binju P Raj & Chandan Swaroop Meena & Nehul Agarwal & Lohit Saini & Shabir Hussain Khahro & Umashankar Subramaniam & Aritra Ghosh, 2021. "A Review on Numerical Approach to Achieve Building Energy Efficiency for Energy, Economy and Environment (3E) Benefit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    6. Abdo Abdullah Ahmed Gassar & Choongwan Koo & Tae Wan Kim & Seung Hyun Cha, 2021. "Performance Optimization Studies on Heating, Cooling and Lighting Energy Systems of Buildings during the Design Stage: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-47, September.
    7. Walker, Linus & Hischier, Illias & Schlueter, Arno, 2022. "Scenario-based robustness assessment of building system life cycle performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    8. Seung Yeoun Choi & Sean Hay Kim, 2021. "Knowledge Acquisition and Representation for High-Performance Building Design: A Review for Defining Requirements for Developing a Design Expert System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-36, April.
    9. Sana Sayadi & Jan Akander & Abolfazl Hayati & Mattias Gustafsson & Mathias Cehlin, 2023. "Comparison of Space Cooling Systems from Energy and Economic Perspectives for a Future City District in Sweden," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Gaspars-Wieloch Helena, 2021. "On some analogies between one-criterion decision making under uncertainty and multi-criteria decision making under certainty," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 17-36, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aikaterini Papapostolou & Charikleia Karakosta & Kalliopi-Anastasia Kourti & Haris Doukas & John Psarras, 2019. "Supporting Europe’s Energy Policy Towards a Decarbonised Energy System: A Comparative Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Luo, Jianing & Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei, 2022. "A quantitative reliability assessment and risk quantification method for microgrids considering supply and demand uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Li, Hangxin & Wang, Shengwei, 2020. "Coordinated robust optimal design of building envelope and energy systems for zero/low energy buildings considering uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Mohammadi, Zahra & Hoes, Pieter Jan & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2020. "Simulation-based design optimization of houses with low grid dependency," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1185-1202.
    5. Kotireddy, Rajesh & Hoes, Pieter-Jan & Hensen, Jan L.M., 2018. "A methodology for performance robustness assessment of low-energy buildings using scenario analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 428-442.
    6. Mavromatidis, Georgios & Orehounig, Kristina & Carmeliet, Jan, 2018. "A review of uncertainty characterisation approaches for the optimal design of distributed energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 258-277.
    7. Forouli, Aikaterini & Gkonis, Nikolaos & Nikas, Alexandros & Siskos, Eleftherios & Doukas, Haris & Tourkolias, Christos, 2019. "Energy efficiency promotion in Greece in light of risk: Evaluating policies as portfolio assets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 818-831.
    8. Yang, Yuchen & Javanroodi, Kavan & Nik, Vahid M., 2021. "Climate change and energy performance of European residential building stocks – A comprehensive impact assessment using climate big data from the coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    9. Tronchin, Lamberto & Manfren, Massimiliano & Nastasi, Benedetto, 2018. "Energy efficiency, demand side management and energy storage technologies – A critical analysis of possible paths of integration in the built environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 341-353.
    10. Rubio Rodríguez, M.A. & Ruyck, J. De & Díaz, P. Roque & Verma, V.K. & Bram, S., 2011. "An LCA based indicator for evaluation of alternative energy routes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 630-635, March.
    11. Berna Tektas Sivrikaya & Ferhan Cebi & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Nihat Kasap & Dursun Delen, 2017. "A fuzzy long-term investment planning model for a GenCo in a hybrid electricity market considering climate change impacts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 975-991, October.
    12. Cai, Yiyong & Newth, David & Finnigan, John & Gunasekera, Don, 2015. "A hybrid energy-economy model for global integrated assessment of climate change, carbon mitigation and energy transformation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 381-395.
    13. Chateau, J. & Dellink, R. & Lanzi, E. & Magne, B., 2012. "Long-term economic growth and environmental pressure: reference scenarios for future global projections," Conference papers 332249, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Berna Tektaş & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Nihat Kasap & Ferhan Çebi & Dursun Delen, 2022. "A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    15. Haurant, P. & Oberti, P. & Muselli, M., 2011. "Multicriteria selection aiding related to photovoltaic plants on farming fields on Corsica island: A real case study using the ELECTRE outranking framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 676-688, February.
    16. Mattia Cottes & Matia Mainardis & Patrizia Simeoni, 2023. "Assessing the Techno-Economic Feasibility of Waste Electric and Electronic Equipment Treatment Plant: A Multi-Decisional Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "The If, How and Where of assessing sustainable resource use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 274-283.
    18. Chinese, Damiana & Nardin, Gioacchino & Saro, Onorio, 2011. "Multi-criteria analysis for the selection of space heating systems in an industrial building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 556-565.
    19. Chopin, Pierre & Guindé, Loïc & Causeret, François & Bergkvist, Göran & Blazy, Jean-Marc, 2019. "Integrating stakeholder preferences into assessment of scenarios for electricity production from locally produced biomass on a small island," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 128-136.
    20. Gerald Nelson & Jessica Bogard & Keith Lividini & Joanne Arsenault & Malcolm Riley & Timothy B. Sulser & Daniel Mason-D’Croz & Brendan Power & David Gustafson & Mario Herrero & Keith Wiebe & Karen Coo, 2018. "Income growth and climate change effects on global nutrition security to mid-century," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(12), pages 773-781, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:267:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920303809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.