IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v259y2020ics0306261919307329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biorefineries productive alternatives optimization in the brazilian sugar and alcohol industry

Author

Listed:
  • Furtado Júnior, Juarez Corrêa
  • Palacio, José Carlos Escobar
  • Leme, Rafael Coradi
  • Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva
  • da Costa, José Eduardo Loureiro
  • Reyes, Arnaldo Martín Martínez
  • del Olmo, Oscar Almazán

Abstract

A technical, economic and environmental analysis of different biorefinery configurations is carried out, considering the integration of different biomass technologies with sugar and ethanol plants. Biochemical routes for the production of lignocellulosic ethanol and biobutanol from ABE (Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol) fermentation were considered as alternatives for conversion, also a thermochemical process for the production of syngas. Second-generation ethanol favors better land use, and biobutanol is an important input for the chemical industry, as well as producing acetone and ethanol as co-products. Syngas from the thermochemical process is very versatile raw material, which can be used to manufacture various products. Syngas was considered for Diesel production through Fischer-Tropsch synthesis process, and also for electricity production. To verify biomass distribution in biorefinery processes, that allows reaching best results from a techno-economic, and environmental point of view, a computational experiment was carried on, using the Kriging method for plant optimization. Solving problems using mathematical modeling as an alternative to traditional methods of optimization can be simplified without loss of generality, precision or need of computer over time. Results show that, from an energy point of view, thermochemical routes perform better, in addition to being able to avoid large amounts of CO2eq emissions. From an economic point of view, biochemical routes prove to be only feasible when all available bagasse is destined for these alternatives. Finally, the process of lignocellulosic ethanol presents a superior performance, having the best combination of analyzed indicators, resulting in a more sustainable process. A Brazilian sugar and alcohol factory was taken as a case study; its results can be extended to any similar installation that uses biomass as a raw material.

Suggested Citation

  • Furtado Júnior, Juarez Corrêa & Palacio, José Carlos Escobar & Leme, Rafael Coradi & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & da Costa, José Eduardo Loureiro & Reyes, Arnaldo Martín Martínez & del Olmo, Oscar Alm, 2020. "Biorefineries productive alternatives optimization in the brazilian sugar and alcohol industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:259:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919307329
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919307329
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pachón, Elia Ruiz & Vaskan, Pavel & Raman, Jegannathan Kenthorai & Gnansounou, Edgard, 2018. "Transition of a South African sugar mill towards a biorefinery. A feasibility assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Mehdad, Ehsan, 2014. "Multivariate versus univariate Kriging metamodels for multi-response simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 573-582.
    3. Santos, V.E.N. & Ely, R.N. & Szklo, A.S. & Magrini, A., 2016. "Chemicals, electricity and fuels from biorefineries processing Brazil׳s sugarcane bagasse: Production recipes and minimum selling prices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1443-1458.
    4. Gani, Asri & Naruse, Ichiro, 2007. "Effect of cellulose and lignin content on pyrolysis and combustion characteristics for several types of biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 649-661.
    5. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Chen, Chih-Jung & Hung, Chen-I & Shen, Cheng-Hsien & Hsu, Heng-Wen, 2013. "A comparison of gasification phenomena among raw biomass, torrefied biomass and coal in an entrained-flow reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 421-430.
    6. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part I," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1427-1445.
    7. Bairamzadeh, Samira & Saidi-Mehrabad, Mohammad & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2018. "Modelling different types of uncertainty in biofuel supply network design and planning: A robust optimization approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 500-517.
    8. Walter, Arnaldo & Ensinas, Adriano V., 2010. "Combined production of second-generation biofuels and electricity from sugarcane residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 874-879.
    9. Väisänen, S. & Havukainen, J. & Uusitalo, V. & Havukainen, M. & Soukka, R. & Luoranen, M., 2016. "Carbon footprint of biobutanol by ABE fermentation from corn and sugarcane," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 401-410.
    10. Renó, Maria Luiza Grillo & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & Palacio, José Carlos Escobar & Venturini, Osvaldo José & Buchgeister, Jens & Almazan, Oscar, 2011. "A LCA (life cycle assessment) of the methanol production from sugarcane bagasse," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3716-3726.
    11. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part II," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1446-1466.
    12. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Mehdad, E., 2014. "Multivariate Versus Univariate Kriging Metamodels for Multi-Response Simulation Models (Revision of 2012-039)," Discussion Paper 2014-012, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Ng, Rex T.L. & Maravelias, Christos T., 2017. "Economic and energetic analysis of biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1571-1582.
    14. Parajuli, Ranjan & Dalgaard, Tommy & Jørgensen, Uffe & Adamsen, Anders Peter S. & Knudsen, Marie Trydeman & Birkved, Morten & Gylling, Morten & Schjørring, Jan Kofod, 2015. "Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: a review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 244-263.
    15. Dantas, Guilherme A. & Legey, Luiz F.L. & Mazzone, Antonella, 2013. "Energy from sugarcane bagasse in Brazil: An assessment of the productivity and cost of different technological routes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 356-364.
    16. Ng, Rex T.L. & Kurniawan, Daniel & Wang, Hua & Mariska, Brian & Wu, Wenzhao & Maravelias, Christos T., 2018. "Integrated framework for designing spatially explicit biofuel supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 116-131.
    17. Takeshita, Takayuki & Yamaji, Kenji, 2008. "Important roles of Fischer-Tropsch synfuels in the global energy future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2791-2802, August.
    18. Im-orb, Karittha & Simasatitkul, Lida & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-economic analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer–Tropsch integrated process with off-gas recirculation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 483-496.
    19. Celebi, Ayse Dilan & Ensinas, Adriano Viana & Sharma, Shivom & Maréchal, François, 2017. "Early-stage decision making approach for the selection of optimally integrated biorefinery processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 908-916.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bressanin, Jéssica Marcon & Guimarães, Henrique Real & Chagas, Mateus Ferreira & Sampaio, Isabelle Lobo de Mesquita & Klein, Bruno Colling & Watanabe, Marcos Djun Barbosa & Bonomi, Antonio & Morais, E, 2021. "Advanced technologies for electricity production in the sugarcane value chain are a strategic option in a carbon reward policy context," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    2. Harahap, Fumi & Leduc, Sylvain & Mesfun, Sennai & Khatiwada, Dilip & Kraxner, Florian & Silveira, Semida, 2020. "Meeting the bioenergy targets from palm oil based biorefineries: An optimal configuration in Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    3. Jéssica Marcon Bressanin & Bruno Colling Klein & Mateus Ferreira Chagas & Marcos Djun Barbosa Watanabe & Isabelle Lobo de Mesquita Sampaio & Antonio Bonomi & Edvaldo Rodrigo de Morais & Otávio Cavalet, 2020. "Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Biomass Gasification and Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis Integrated to Sugarcane Biorefineries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Patterson & Jaime Massanet‐Nicolau & Rhys Jones & Alessio Boldrin & Francesco Valentino & Richard Dinsdale & Alan Guwy, 2021. "Utilizing grass for the biological production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) via green biorefining: Material and energy flows," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(3), pages 802-815, June.
    2. Ng, Rex T.L. & Fasahati, Peyman & Huang, Kefeng & Maravelias, Christos T., 2019. "Utilizing stillage in the biorefinery: Economic, technological and energetic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 491-503.
    3. Morone, Amruta & Apte, Mayura & Pandey, R.A., 2015. "Levulinic acid production from renewable waste resources: Bottlenecks, potential remedies, advancements and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 548-565.
    4. Melts, Indrek & Ivask, Mari & Geetha, Mohan & Takeuchi, Kazuhiko & Heinsoo, Katrin, 2019. "Combining bioenergy and nature conservation: An example in wetlands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 293-302.
    5. Francesca Demichelis & Francesco Piovano & Silvia Fiore, 2019. "Biowaste Management in Italy: Challenges and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Alessandra Cesaro & Vincenzo Belgiorno, 2015. "Combined Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, August.
    7. López-González, D. & Puig-Gamero, M. & Acién, F.G. & García-Cuadra, F. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2015. "Energetic, economic and environmental assessment of the pyrolysis and combustion of microalgae and their oils," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1752-1770.
    8. Menafoglio, Alessandra & Secchi, Piercesare, 2017. "Statistical analysis of complex and spatially dependent data: A review of Object Oriented Spatial Statistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 401-410.
    9. Carvalho, Ana Karine F. & Bento, Heitor B.S. & Izário Filho, Hélcio J. & de Castro, Heizir F., 2018. "Approaches to convert Mucor circinelloides lipid into biodiesel by enzymatic synthesis assisted by microwave irradiations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 747-754.
    10. Perkins, Greg & Bhaskar, Thallada & Konarova, Muxina, 2018. "Process development status of fast pyrolysis technologies for the manufacture of renewable transport fuels from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 292-315.
    11. Binois, M. & Ginsbourger, D. & Roustant, O., 2015. "Quantifying uncertainty on Pareto fronts with Gaussian process conditional simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 386-394.
    12. Liu, Yushan & Li, Luyi & Zhao, Sihan & Song, Shufang, 2021. "A global surrogate model technique based on principal component analysis and Kriging for uncertainty propagation of dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    13. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sindhu, Raveendran & Sirohi, Ranjna & Kumar, Vinod & Ahluwalia, Vivek & Binod, Parameswaran & Juneja, Ankita & Kumar, Deepak & Yan, Binghua & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Zhang, Zengqi, 2022. "Agricultural waste biorefinery development towards circular bioeconomy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Taylor-de-Lima, Reynaldo L.N. & Gerbasi da Silva, Arthur José & Legey, Luiz F.L. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2018. "Evaluation of economic feasibility under uncertainty of a thermochemical route for ethanol production in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 363-376.
    15. Kalil Rahiman, M. & Santhoshkumar, S. & Subramaniam, D. & Avinash, A. & Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan, 2022. "Effects of oxygenated fuel pertaining to fuel analysis on diesel engine combustion and emission characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    16. Hoo Poh Ying & Cassendra Bong Phun Chien & Fan Yee Van, 2020. "Operational Management Implemented in Biofuel Upstream Supply Chain and Downstream International Trading: Current Issues in Southeast Asia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, April.
    17. Sunčica Beluhan & Katarina Mihajlovski & Božidar Šantek & Mirela Ivančić Šantek, 2023. "The Production of Bioethanol from Lignocellulosic Biomass: Pretreatment Methods, Fermentation, and Downstream Processing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-38, October.
    18. Lee, Jechan & Choi, Dongho & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Ok, Yong Sik, 2017. "Functional modification of hydrothermal liquefaction products of microalgal biomass using CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 412-418.
    19. Van Meerbeek, Koenraad & Muys, Bart & Hermy, Martin, 2019. "Lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy beyond intensive cropland and forests," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 139-149.
    20. Khatiwada, Dilip & Leduc, Sylvain & Silveira, Semida & McCallum, Ian, 2016. "Optimizing ethanol and bioelectricity production in sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 371-386.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:259:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919307329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.