IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v190y2017icp326-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of Power-to-Gas: Approaches, system variations and their environmental implications

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xiaojin
  • Bauer, Christian
  • Mutel, Christopher L.
  • Volkart, Kathrin

Abstract

Electricity generation from intermittent renewable sources is expected to increase rapidly in the next decades. Integrating renewable energy requires energy storage during low-demand periods and potential conversion of surplus electricity into other energy carriers. Power-to-Gas (P2G) is a promising technology due to its potential to provide large-scale and long-term energy storage. However, this technology has many system variations, and their environmental performances need to be evaluated and compared with conventional technologies before large-scale deployment. In this paper, we investigate the environmental performance of P2G using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and mainly focus on the following three aspects: (1) discussion of differences as consequence of the approach applied for CO2 Capture and Utilization (CCU); (2) evaluation of technology variations including supply of electricity, alternative system processes (electrolysis technologies and CO2 sources), product gases (hydrogen and methane), and comparison of these P2G systems with conventional technologies, and (3) investigation of further environmental impacts of P2G in addition to the impact of global warming potential. We argue that in case of P2M, system expansion provides more meaningful results than subdivision for CCU, since it reflects the added value of CO2 utilization providing electricity or cement with low GHG intensity. The results of system variations show that P2G can, depending on electricity supply and CO2 source, reduce GHG emission compared to conventional gas production technologies, and that P2H has higher potential of emission reduction than P2M. Concerning other impact categories, P2H can have lower impacts than conventional hydrogen production, while P2M most often has higher impacts than using conventional natural gas.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xiaojin & Bauer, Christian & Mutel, Christopher L. & Volkart, Kathrin, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of Power-to-Gas: Approaches, system variations and their environmental implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 326-338.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:190:y:2017:i:c:p:326-338
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916318682
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guandalini, Giulio & Campanari, Stefano & Romano, Matteo C., 2015. "Power-to-gas plants and gas turbines for improved wind energy dispatchability: Energy and economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 117-130.
    2. Rehman, Shafiqur & Al-Hadhrami, Luai M. & Alam, Md. Mahbub, 2015. "Pumped hydro energy storage system: A technological review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 586-598.
    3. Zoss, Toms & Dace, Elina & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2016. "Modeling a power-to-renewable methane system for an assessment of power grid balancing options in the Baltic States’ region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 278-285.
    4. Johnson, Jeremiah X. & De Kleine, Robert & Keoleian, Gregory A., 2014. "Assessment of energy storage for transmission-constrained wind," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 377-388.
    5. Raadal, Hanne Lerche & Vold, Bjørn Ivar & Myhr, Anders & Nygaard, Tor Anders, 2014. "GHG emissions and energy performance of offshore wind power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 314-324.
    6. Sharma, Sunita & Ghoshal, Sib Krishna, 2015. "Hydrogen the future transportation fuel: From production to applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1151-1158.
    7. Searchinger, Timothy & Heimlich, Ralph & Houghton, R. A. & Dong, Fengxia & Elobeid, Amani & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Tokgoz, Simla & Hayes, Dermot J. & Yu, Hun-Hsiang, 2008. "Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12881, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Bensmann, B. & Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. & Müller-Syring, G. & Henel, M. & Sundmacher, K., 2016. "Optimal configuration and pressure levels of electrolyzer plants in context of power-to-gas applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 107-124.
    9. Luo, Guo-liang & Li, Yan-ling & Tang, Wen-jun & Wei, Xiao, 2016. "Wind curtailment of China׳s wind power operation: Evolution, causes and solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1190-1201.
    10. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    11. Flowers, Mallory E. & Smith, Matthew K. & Parsekian, Ara W. & Boyuk, Dmitriy S. & McGrath, Jenna K. & Yates, Luke, 2016. "Climate impacts on the cost of solar energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 264-273.
    12. Evans, Annette & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim J., 2012. "Assessment of utility energy storage options for increased renewable energy penetration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4141-4147.
    13. Shahryar Garmsiri & Marc A. Rosen & Gordon Rymal Smith, 2014. "Integration of Wind Energy, Hydrogen and Natural Gas Pipeline Systems to Meet Community and Transportation Energy Needs: A Parametric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-21, April.
    14. de Sisternes, Fernando J. & Jenkins, Jesse D. & Botterud, Audun, 2016. "The value of energy storage in decarbonizing the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 368-379.
    15. Burkhardt, Jörg & Patyk, Andreas & Tanguy, Philippe & Retzke, Carsten, 2016. "Hydrogen mobility from wind energy – A life cycle assessment focusing on the fuel supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 54-64.
    16. Solomon, A.A. & Kammen, Daniel M. & Callaway, D., 2014. "The role of large-scale energy storage design and dispatch in the power grid: A study of very high grid penetration of variable renewable resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 75-89.
    17. David Keith & Minh Ha-Duong & Joshua K. Stolaroff, 2006. "Climate strategy with CO2 capture from the air," Post-Print halshs-00003926, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanouil, Stergios & Nikolopoulos, Efthymios I. & François, Baptiste & Brown, Casey & Anagnostou, Emmanouil N., 2021. "Evaluating existing water supply reservoirs as small-scale pumped hydroelectric storage options – A case study in Connecticut," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Parra, David & Zhang, Xiaojin & Bauer, Christian & Patel, Martin K., 2017. "An integrated techno-economic and life cycle environmental assessment of power-to-gas systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 440-454.
    3. Strübing, Dietmar & Moeller, Andreas B. & Mößnang, Bettina & Lebuhn, Michael & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Anaerobic thermophilic trickle bed reactor as a promising technology for flexible and demand-oriented H2/CO2 biomethanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 543-554.
    4. Das, Choton K. & Bass, Octavian & Kothapalli, Ganesh & Mahmoud, Thair S. & Habibi, Daryoush, 2018. "Optimal placement of distributed energy storage systems in distribution networks using artificial bee colony algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 212-228.
    5. Lin, Boqiang & Wu, Wei & Bai, Mengqi & Xie, Chunping & Radcliffe, Jonathan, 2019. "Liquid air energy storage: Price arbitrage operations and sizing optimization in the GB real-time electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 647-655.
    6. Blanco, Herib & Faaij, André, 2018. "A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on Power to Gas and long-term storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1049-1086.
    7. Das, Choton K. & Bass, Octavian & Mahmoud, Thair S. & Kothapalli, Ganesh & Mousavi, Navid & Habibi, Daryoush & Masoum, Mohammad A.S., 2019. "Optimal allocation of distributed energy storage systems to improve performance and power quality of distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    8. O'Callaghan, O. & Donnellan, P., 2021. "Liquid air energy storage systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Lu, Xu & Wang, Siheng, 2017. "A GIS-based assessment of Tibet's potential for pumped hydropower energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1045-1054.
    10. Jonathan Fahlbeck & Håkan Nilsson & Saeed Salehi, 2021. "Flow Characteristics of Preliminary Shutdown and Startup Sequences for a Model Counter-Rotating Pump-Turbine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Pusceddu, Elian & Zakeri, Behnam & Castagneto Gissey, Giorgio, 2021. "Synergies between energy arbitrage and fast frequency response for battery energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Shaohua Hu & Xinlong Zhou & Yi Luo & Guang Zhang, 2019. "Numerical Simulation Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Seepage in a Pumped-Storage Power Station: Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Kotowicz, Janusz & Bartela, Łukasz & Węcel, Daniel & Dubiel, Klaudia, 2017. "Hydrogen generator characteristics for storage of renewably-generated energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 156-171.
    14. Vecchi, Andrea & Naughton, James & Li, Yongliang & Mancarella, Pierluigi & Sciacovelli, Adriano, 2020. "Multi-mode operation of a Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) plant providing energy arbitrage and reserve services – Analysis of optimal scheduling and sizing through MILP modelling with integrated ther," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Laslett, Dean & Carter, Craig & Creagh, Chris & Jennings, Philip, 2017. "A large-scale renewable electricity supply system by 2030: Solar, wind, energy efficiency, storage and inertia for the South West Interconnected System (SWIS) in Western Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 713-731.
    16. de Sisternes, Fernando J. & Jenkins, Jesse D. & Botterud, Audun, 2016. "The value of energy storage in decarbonizing the electricity sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 368-379.
    17. Yunesky Masip Macía & Pablo Rodríguez Machuca & Angel Alexander Rodríguez Soto & Roberto Carmona Campos, 2021. "Green Hydrogen Value Chain in the Sustainability for Port Operations: Case Study in the Region of Valparaiso, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Gallo, A.B. & Simões-Moreira, J.R. & Costa, H.K.M. & Santos, M.M. & Moutinho dos Santos, E., 2016. "Energy storage in the energy transition context: A technology review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 800-822.
    19. Diego Rodríguez Rodríguez, 2019. "Los costes de la transición: las centrales de bombeo y el gas en sistemas aislados," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2019-13, FEDEA.
    20. Solomon, A.A. & Kammen, Daniel M. & Callaway, D., 2016. "Investigating the impact of wind–solar complementarities on energy storage requirement and the corresponding supply reliability criteria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 130-145.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:190:y:2017:i:c:p:326-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.