IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v136y2014icp692-703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Household fuel use for cooking and heating in China: Results from the first Chinese Environmental Exposure-Related Human Activity Patterns Survey (CEERHAPS)

Author

Listed:
  • Duan, Xiaoli
  • Jiang, Yong
  • Wang, Beibei
  • Zhao, Xiuge
  • Shen, Guofeng
  • Cao, Suzhen
  • Huang, Nan
  • Qian, Yan
  • Chen, Yiting
  • Wang, Limin

Abstract

Household fuel-use (HFU) patterns are strongly associated with multiple effects, including air quality, human health, and regional climate change. This paper presents the results from the first Chinese Environmental Exposure-Related Human Activity Patterns Survey (CEERHAPS), carried out among 91,121 households located in 9108 villages, 636 towns, and 159 counties in 31 provinces. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with each participant to obtain information about the type of fuels used for cooking and heating. The main objectives of this paper were to investigate HFU for cooking and heating in China, to validate the World Health Organization (WHO) model, and to help inform local evaluation models. In China, gas and biomass fuels, the dominant energy fuels for cooking, are used by 44.8% and 32.1% of households, respectively. Approximately 34.1% of families have no household heating during the cold season, and 16.7%, 15.6% and 12.8% of households rely on coal, electricity, and biomass, respectively, for household heating when no central heating was available. The proportion of households using solid fuels has generally decreased during the last two decades. Considerable spatial variation was evident in the HFU patterns for both cooking and heating. The data revealed that the predominant fuel for cooking was biomass (47.6%) in rural populations, whereas urban households were more likely to cook with gas (65.8%). In terms of heating, coal (21.4%) and biomass (19.0%) were the main fuels used in rural households, while electricity (23.6%) and coal (10.5%) were more commonly used in urban areas. The overall HFU results for cooking from this study were comparable to those predicted using the WHO model. We also developed models at the provincial level to estimate HFU for cooking and heating in China; it is expected that the model, if confirmed by future studies, could be used for future research on household air pollution, domestic human exposure and burden of disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Duan, Xiaoli & Jiang, Yong & Wang, Beibei & Zhao, Xiuge & Shen, Guofeng & Cao, Suzhen & Huang, Nan & Qian, Yan & Chen, Yiting & Wang, Limin, 2014. "Household fuel use for cooking and heating in China: Results from the first Chinese Environmental Exposure-Related Human Activity Patterns Survey (CEERHAPS)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 692-703.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:136:y:2014:i:c:p:692-703
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914010149
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Venkataramani, A.S. & Fried, B.J., 2011. "Effect of worldwide oil price fluctuations on biomass fuel use and child respiratory health: Evidence from Guatemala," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(9), pages 1668-1675.
    2. Chang, J. & Leung, Dennis Y. C. & Wu, C. Z. & Yuan, Z. H., 2003. "A review on the energy production, consumption, and prospect of renewable energy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 453-468, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juaidi, Adel & Montoya, Francisco G. & Ibrik, Imad H. & Manzano-Agugliaro, Francisco, 2016. "An overview of renewable energy potential in Palestine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 943-960.
    2. Liu, H. & Jiang, G.M. & Zhuang, H.Y. & Wang, K.J., 2008. "Distribution, utilization structure and potential of biomass resources in rural China: With special references of crop residues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 1402-1418, June.
    3. Zaman, Khalid & Khan, Muhammad Mushtaq & Ahmad, Mehboob & Rustam, Rabiah, 2012. "The relationship between agricultural technology and energy demand in Pakistan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 268-279.
    4. Lindner, Soeren & Liu, Zhu & Guan, Dabo & Geng, Yong & Li, Xin, 2013. "CO2 emissions from China’s power sector at the provincial level: Consumption versus production perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 164-172.
    5. Fanta Barry & Marie Sawadogo & Maïmouna Bologo (Traoré) & Igor W. K. Ouédraogo & Thomas Dogot, 2021. "Key Barriers to the Adoption of Biomass Gasification in Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Cherni, Judith A. & Kentish, Joanna, 2007. "Renewable energy policy and electricity market reforms in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 3616-3629, July.
    7. Deng, Yanfei & Xu, Jiuping & Liu, Ying & Mancl, Karen, 2014. "Biogas as a sustainable energy source in China: Regional development strategy application and decision making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 294-303.
    8. Moradi, Hamed & Vossoughi, Gholamreza, 2015. "Robust control of the variable speed wind turbines in the presence of uncertainties: A comparison between H∞ and PID controllers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1508-1521.
    9. Dong Lin Loo & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Jun Sheng Teh & Liviu Catalin Andrei & Slađana Starčević & Farooq Sher, 2021. "Applications Characteristics of Different Biodiesel Blends in Modern Vehicles Engines: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-31, August.
    10. Khattak, Naeem Ur Rehman Khattak & Hussain, Anwar Hussain, 2009. "Determinants of Gas Energy Consumption in Pakistan: An Econometric Analysis (1971-2006)," MPRA Paper 41993, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Bhutto, Abdul Waheed & Bazmi, Aqeel Ahmed & Zahedi, Gholamreza, 2011. "Greener energy: Issues and challenges for Pakistan--Biomass energy prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 3207-3219, August.
    12. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    13. Long, Jimiao & Deng, Lei & Che, Defu, 2020. "Analysis on organic compounds in water leachate from biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1070-1078.
    14. Ma, Hengyun & Oxley, Les & Gibson, John & Li, Wen, 2010. "A survey of China's renewable energy economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 438-445, January.
    15. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Bogdan Klepacki & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Konrad Michalski, 2021. "Changes in Energy Consumption in Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Gokcol, Cihan & Dursun, Bahtiyar & Alboyaci, Bora & Sunan, Erkan, 2009. "Importance of biomass energy as alternative to other sources in Turkey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 424-431, February.
    17. Gozgor, Giray, 2016. "Are shocks to renewable energy consumption permanent or transitory? An empirical investigation for Brazil, China, and India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 913-919.
    18. Ansorena Ruiz, R. & de Vilder, L.H. & Prasasti, E.B. & Aouad, M. & De Luca, A. & Geisseler, B. & Terheiden, K. & Scanu, S. & Miccoli, A. & Roeber, V. & Marence, M. & Moll, R. & Bricker, J.D. & Goseber, 2022. "Low-head pumped hydro storage: A review on civil structure designs, legal and environmental aspects to make its realization feasible in seawater," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Hu, Jin-Li & Wang, Shih-Chuan, 2006. "Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 3206-3217, November.
    20. Kardooni, Roozbeh & Yusoff, Sumiani Binti & Kari, Fatimah Binti, 2016. "Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:136:y:2014:i:c:p:692-703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.