IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v115y2014icp525-530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CFD validation of scaling rules for reduced-scale field releases of carbon dioxide

Author

Listed:
  • Xing, Ji
  • Liu, Zhenyi
  • Huang, Ping
  • Feng, Changgen
  • Zhou, Yi
  • Sun, Ruiyan
  • Wang, Shigang

Abstract

Carbon Dioxide-Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO2-EOR) has the potential for well blowouts that could cause casualties and environmental damage. To assess the consequence of such accidents, a reduced-scale field experiment of CO2 release was performed based on scaling rules instead of a full-size field test that was economically infeasible. A series of scaling rules was introduced to upscale the reduced-scale field experiment to full-size. To validate the scaling rules, numerical simulation was carried out based on the k–ε turbulence model which proved to be an effective way to predict the concentration field for heavy gas dispersion. For concentration variation, the general tendencies of the simulation and experimental observations remained identical except nearby the jet nozzle where the measured CO2 concentration from the experiment was obviously higher than that in the simulation. Statistical performance indicators were introduced to verify the consistency between the scaled results and the simulated ones, and the results showed that using the scaling rules to scale the field experiment exhibited acceptable accuracy at small flow rates and these scaling rules appear applicable for field experiments of accidental releases.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing, Ji & Liu, Zhenyi & Huang, Ping & Feng, Changgen & Zhou, Yi & Sun, Ruiyan & Wang, Shigang, 2014. "CFD validation of scaling rules for reduced-scale field releases of carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 525-530.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:115:y:2014:i:c:p:525-530
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913008799
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang, Xi & Reiner, David & Li, Jia, 2011. "Perceptions of opinion leaders towards CCS demonstration projects in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1873-1885, May.
    2. Danao, Louis Angelo & Eboibi, Okeoghene & Howell, Robert, 2013. "An experimental investigation into the influence of unsteady wind on the performance of a vertical axis wind turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 403-411.
    3. Viebahn, Peter & Daniel, Vallentin & Samuel, Höller, 2012. "Integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the German power sector and comparison with the deployment of renewable energies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 238-248.
    4. Gnana Sagaya Raj, Antony Raj & Mallikarjuna, Jawali Maharudrappa & Ganesan, Venkitachalam, 2013. "Energy efficient piston configuration for effective air motion – A CFD study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 347-354.
    5. Weydahl, Torleif & Jamaluddin, Jamal & Seljeskog, Morten & Anantharaman, Rahul, 2013. "Pursuing the pre-combustion CCS route in oil refineries – The impact on fired heaters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 833-839.
    6. Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2011. "A real options–based CCS investment evaluation model: Case study of China’s power generation sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4320-4333.
    7. Bansal, Vikas & Misra, Rohit & Agarwal, Ghanshyam Das & Mathur, Jyotirmay, 2013. "‘Derating Factor’ new concept for evaluating thermal performance of earth air tunnel heat exchanger: A transient CFD analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 418-426.
    8. Jiang, Xi, 2011. "A review of physical modelling and numerical simulation of long-term geological storage of CO2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3557-3566.
    9. Wu, Zhiyong & Caliot, Cyril & Bai, Fengwu & Flamant, Gilles & Wang, Zhifeng & Zhang, Jinsong & Tian, Chong, 2010. "Experimental and numerical studies of the pressure drop in ceramic foams for volumetric solar receiver applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 504-513, February.
    10. Wee, Jung-Ho, 2013. "A review on carbon dioxide capture and storage technology using coal fly ash," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 143-151.
    11. Hachicha, A.A. & Rodríguez, I. & Castro, J. & Oliva, A., 2013. "Numerical simulation of wind flow around a parabolic trough solar collector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 426-437.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Xiaolu & Yan, Xingqing & Yu, Jianliang & Zhang, Yongchun & Chen, Shaoyun & Mahgerefteh, Haroun & Martynov, Sergey & Collard, Alexander & Proust, Christophe, 2016. "Pressure response and phase transition in supercritical CO2 releases from a large-scale pipeline," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 189-197.
    2. Guo, Xiaolu & Yan, Xingqing & Yu, Jianliang & Zhang, Yongchun & Chen, Shaoyun & Mahgerefteh, Haroun & Martynov, Sergey & Collard, Alexander & Proust, Christophe, 2016. "Under-expanded jets and dispersion in supercritical CO2 releases from a large-scale pipeline," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1279-1291.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanna, Aimaro & Dri, Marco & Hall, Matthew R. & Maroto-Valer, Mercedes, 2012. "Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM) – A UK perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 545-554.
    2. Rochedo, Pedro R.R. & Szklo, Alexandre, 2013. "Designing learning curves for carbon capture based on chemical absorption according to the minimum work of separation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 383-391.
    3. Tamaki, Tetsuya & Nozawa, Wataru & Managi, Shunsuke, 2017. "Evaluation of the ocean ecosystem: Climate change modelling with backstop technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 428-439.
    4. Njomza Ibrahimi & Alemayehu Gebremedhin & Alketa Sahiti, 2019. "Achieving a Flexible and Sustainable Energy System: The Case of Kosovo," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.
    6. Lee, Jaehee & Han, Sang-Jun & Wee, Jung-Ho, 2014. "Synthesis of dry sorbents for carbon dioxide capture using coal fly ash and its performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 40-47.
    7. Tamaki, Tetsuya & Nozawa, Wataru & Managi, Shunsuke, 2017. "Evaluation of the ocean ecosystem: climate change modelling with backstop technology," MPRA Paper 80549, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Zhang, Xian & Wang, Xingwei & Chen, Jiajun & Xie, Xi & Wang, Ke & Wei, Yiming, 2014. "A novel modeling based real option approach for CCS investment evaluation under multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1059-1067.
    9. Lee, Suh-Young & Lee, Jae-Uk & Lee, In-Beum & Han, Jeehoon, 2017. "Design under uncertainty of carbon capture and storage infrastructure considering cost, environmental impact, and preference on risk," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 725-738.
    10. Herui Cui & Tian Zhao & Ruirui Wu, 2018. "An Investment Feasibility Analysis of CCS Retrofit Based on a Two-Stage Compound Real Options Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Höller, Samuel & Viebahn, Peter, 2016. "Facing the uncertainty of CO2 storage capacity in China by developing different storage scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 64-73.
    12. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    13. Viebahn, Peter & Vallentin, Daniel & Höller, Samuel, 2015. "Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China’s power sector – An integrated assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 229-244.
    14. Chen, Shiyi & Xiang, Wenguo & Wang, Dong & Xue, Zhipeng, 2012. "Incorporating IGCC and CaO sorption-enhanced process for power generation with CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 285-294.
    15. Jiang, Xi & Akber Hassan, Wasim A. & Gluyas, Jon, 2013. "Modelling and monitoring of geological carbon storage: A perspective on cross-validation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 784-792.
    16. Peter Viebahn & Emile J. L. Chappin, 2018. "Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage—A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-45, September.
    17. Lee, Jui-Yuan & Tan, Raymond R. & Chen, Cheng-Liang, 2014. "A unified model for the deployment of carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 140-148.
    18. Fan, Jing-Li & Xu, Mao & Li, Fengyu & Yang, Lin & Zhang, Xian, 2018. "Carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofit potential of coal-fired power plants in China: The technology lock-in and cost optimization perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 326-334.
    19. Kim, Youngmin & Jang, Hochang & Kim, Junggyun & Lee, Jeonghwan, 2017. "Prediction of storage efficiency on CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers using artificial neural network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 916-928.
    20. Campanari, Stefano & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Chiesa, Paolo, 2013. "Using MCFC for high efficiency CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycles: Comparison of internal and external reforming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 772-783.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:115:y:2014:i:c:p:525-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.