IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v112y2013icp834-842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle primary energy use and carbon footprint of wood-frame conventional and passive houses with biomass-based energy supply

Author

Listed:
  • Dodoo, Ambrose
  • Gustavsson, Leif

Abstract

In this study the primary energy use and carbon footprint over the life cycle of a wood-frame apartment building designed either conventionally or to the passive house standard are analyzed. Scenarios where the building is heated with electric resistance heaters, bedrock heat pump or cogeneration-based district heat, all with biomass-based energy supply, are compared. The analysis covers all life cycle phases of the buildings, including extraction of raw materials, processing of raw materials into building materials, fabrication and assembly of materials into a ready building, operation and use of the buildings, and the demolition of the buildings and the post-use management of the building materials. The primary energy analysis encompasses the entire energy chains from the extraction of natural resources to the delivered energy services. The carbon footprint accounting includes fossil fuel emissions, cement process reaction emissions, potential avoided fossil fuel emissions due to biomass residues substitution and end-of-life benefit of post-use materials. The results show that the operation of the building accounts for the largest share of life cycle primary energy use. The passive house design reduces the primary energy use and CO2 emission for heating, and the significance of this reduction depends on the type of heating and energy supply systems. The choice of end-use heating system strongly influences the life cycle impacts. A biomass-based system with cogeneration of district heat and electricity gives low primary energy use and low carbon footprint, even with a conventional design. The amount of biomass residues from the wood products chain is large and can be used to substitute fossil fuels. This significantly reduces the net carbon footprint for both the conventional and passive house designs. This study shows the importance of adopting a life cycle perspective involving production, construction, operation, end-of-life, and energy supply when evaluating the primary energy use and climatic impacts of both passive and conventional buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif, 2013. "Life cycle primary energy use and carbon footprint of wood-frame conventional and passive houses with biomass-based energy supply," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 834-842.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:112:y:2013:i:c:p:834-842
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913003024
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gustavsson, Leif & Karlsson, Asa, 2002. "A system perspective on the heating of detached houses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 553-574, June.
    2. Leif Gustavsson & Kim Pingoud & Roger Sathre, 2006. "Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 667-691, May.
    3. Leif Gustavsson & Åsa Karlsson, 2006. "CO 2 Mitigation: On Methods and Parameters for Comparison of Fossil-Fuel and Biofuel Systems," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 935-959, September.
    4. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Sathre, Roger, 2012. "Effect of thermal mass on life cycle primary energy balances of a concrete- and a wood-frame building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 462-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jozef Švajlenka & Mária Kozlovská, 2021. "Analysis of the Thermal–Technical Properties of Modern Log Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Rodríguez-Soria, Beatriz & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2018. "Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1510-1521.
    3. Atmaca, Adem & Atmaca, Nihat, 2016. "Comparative life cycle energy and cost analysis of post-disaster temporary housings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 429-443.
    4. Schwartz, Yair & Raslan, Rokia & Mumovic, Dejan, 2018. "The life cycle carbon footprint of refurbished and new buildings – A systematic review of case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 231-241.
    5. Nguyen, Truong & Gustavsson, Leif & Dodoo, Ambrose & Tettey, Uniben Yao Ayikoe, 2020. "Implications of supplying district heat to a new urban residential area in Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    6. Murphy, Fionnuala & Devlin, Ger & McDonnell, Kevin, 2014. "Forest biomass supply chains in Ireland: A life cycle assessment of GHG emissions and primary energy balances," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-8.
    7. Kylili, Angeliki & Ilic, Milos & Fokaides, Paris A., 2017. "Whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a passive house of the sub-tropical climatic zone," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 169-177.
    8. Bruno, Roberto & Bevilacqua, Piero & Cuconati, Teresa & Arcuri, Natale, 2019. "Energy evaluations of an innovative multi-storey wooden near Zero Energy Building designed for Mediterranean areas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 929-941.
    9. Essossinam Beguedou & Satyanarayana Narra & Ekua Afrakoma Armoo & Komi Agboka & Mani Kongnine Damgou, 2023. "E-Technology Enabled Sourcing of Alternative Fuels to Create a Fair-Trade Circular Economy for Sustainable Energy in Togo," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Soares, N. & Bastos, J. & Pereira, L. Dias & Soares, A. & Amaral, A.R. & Asadi, E. & Rodrigues, E. & Lamas, F.B. & Monteiro, H. & Lopes, M.A.R. & Gaspar, A.R., 2017. "A review on current advances in the energy and environmental performance of buildings towards a more sustainable built environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 845-860.
    11. Hossein Omrany & Veronica Soebarto & Ehsan Sharifi & Ali Soltani, 2020. "Application of Life Cycle Energy Assessment in Residential Buildings: A Critical Review of Recent Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, January.
    12. Joselin Herbert, G.M. & Unni Krishnan, A., 2016. "Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 292-308.
    13. Mahapatra, K., 2015. "Energy use and CO2 emission of new residential buildings built under specific requirements – The case of Växjö municipality, Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 31-38.
    14. Piccardo, C. & Dodoo, A. & Gustavsson, L. & Tettey, U.Y.A., 2020. "Retrofitting with different building materials: Life-cycle primary energy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Meng Zhen & Bin Zhang, 2018. "Energy Performance of a Light Wood-Timber Structured House in the Severely Cold Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Elżbieta Broniewicz & Karolina Dec, 2022. "Environmental Impact of Demolishing a Steel Structure Design for Disassembly," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sathre, Roger & Gustavsson, Leif, 2009. "Process-based analysis of added value in forest product industries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 65-75, January.
    2. Gustavsson, Leif & Haus, Sylvia & Lundblad, Mattias & Lundström, Anders & Ortiz, Carina A. & Sathre, Roger & Truong, Nguyen Le & Wikberg, Per-Erik, 2017. "Climate change effects of forestry and substitution of carbon-intensive materials and fossil fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 612-624.
    3. Truong, Nguyen Le & Gustavsson, Leif, 2013. "Integrated biomass-based production of district heat, electricity, motor fuels and pellets of different scales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 623-632.
    4. Joelsson, Anna & Gustavsson, Leif, 2009. "District heating and energy efficiency in detached houses of differing size and construction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 126-134, February.
    5. Dixit, Manish K., 2017. "Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 390-413.
    6. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Sathre, Roger, 2010. "Life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a wood-framed apartment building to passive house standard," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1152-1160.
    7. Joelsson, J.M. & Gustavsson, L., 2008. "CO2 emission and oil use reduction through black liquor gasification and energy efficiency in pulp and paper industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 747-763.
    8. Joelsson, Jonas & Gustavsson, Leif, 2012. "Swedish biomass strategies to reduce CO2 emission and oil use in an EU context," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 448-468.
    9. Tettey, Uniben Yao Ayikoe & Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif, 2017. "Energy use implications of different design strategies for multi-storey residential buildings under future climates," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 846-860.
    10. Tettey, Uniben Yao Ayikoe & Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif, 2016. "Primary energy implications of different design strategies for an apartment building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 132-148.
    11. Gustavsson, L. & Holmberg, J. & Dornburg, V. & Sathre, R. & Eggers, T. & Mahapatra, K. & Marland, G., 2007. "Using biomass for climate change mitigation and oil use reduction," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5671-5691, November.
    12. Mahapatra, K., 2015. "Energy use and CO2 emission of new residential buildings built under specific requirements – The case of Växjö municipality, Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 31-38.
    13. Du, Kun & Calautit, John & Eames, Philip & Wu, Yupeng, 2021. "A state-of-the-art review of the application of phase change materials (PCM) in Mobilized-Thermal Energy Storage (M-TES) for recovering low-temperature industrial waste heat (IWH) for distributed heat," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1040-1057.
    14. Rodrigues, Eugénio & Fernandes, Marco S. & Gaspar, Adélio Rodrigues & Gomes, Álvaro & Costa, José J., 2019. "Thermal transmittance effect on energy consumption of Mediterranean buildings with different thermal mass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Kay Damen & André Faaij, 2006. "A Greenhouse Gas Balance of two Existing International Biomass Import Chains," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 1023-1050, September.
    16. Truong, Nguyen Le & Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif, 2018. "Effects of energy efficiency measures in district-heated buildings on energy supply," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1114-1127.
    17. Sampo Soimakallio & Tuomo Kalliokoski & Aleksi Lehtonen & Olli Salminen, 2021. "On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Gustavsson, Leif & Haus, Sylvia & Ortiz, Carina A. & Sathre, Roger & Truong, Nguyen Le, 2015. "Climate effects of bioenergy from forest residues in comparison to fossil energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 36-50.
    19. Piccardo, C. & Dodoo, A. & Gustavsson, L. & Tettey, U.Y.A., 2020. "Retrofitting with different building materials: Life-cycle primary energy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    20. Elias Hurmekoski & Juulia Suuronen & Lassi Ahlvik & Janni Kunttu & Tanja Myllyviita, 2022. "Substitution impacts of wood‐based textile fibers: Influence of market assumptions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1564-1577, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:112:y:2013:i:c:p:834-842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.