IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-22-00570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Most-favored customer clauses with differentiated goods and tacit collusion

Author

Listed:
  • Chun-Chieh Wang

    (National Sun Yat-Sen University)

Abstract

The most-favored-customer (MFC) clauses are widely used by franchised retailers as well as the low-price-guarantee (LPG) clauses. Many literature discuss the anti-competition effect of the MFC clauses by using models with homogeneous products the same as what is done to the LPG clauses. Instead, I study the anti-competition effect of the MFC clauses with horizontally differentiated goods in a repeated Bertrand competition and find the anti-competition effect highly related to the homogeneity of products. The MFC clauses have a strong anti-competition effect especially when the homogeneity of product and hassle costs are low. However, considering the potential harm of tacit collusion, the MFC clauses should be concerned by the antitrust agency only when the homogeneity of product is intermediate.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun-Chieh Wang, 2022. "Most-favored customer clauses with differentiated goods and tacit collusion," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(4), pages 1755-1766.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-22-00570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2022/Volume42/EB-22-V42-I4-P146.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Most-Favored-Customer Clauses; Differentiated Products; Bertrand Competition; Tacit Collusion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
    • L4 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-22-00570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.