IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-16-00552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The bigger, the better? An investigation of optimal volume of big data

Author

Listed:
  • Bonyoung Koo

    (Logos Logistics Inc.)

  • Seung Ho Yoo

    (Sunmoon University)

  • Byung Cho Kim

    (Korea University)

Abstract

Big data has changed the way modern businesses run. Recently, big data has drawn huge attention from academic researchers, industry practitioners, and policy makers. While the common belief about big data is that many benefits come from the data volume, existing studies identify challenges associated with big data volume such as privacy concerns and management cost. Given the trade-off between the opportunities and the challenges from big data, we presume that there exists an optimal volume of data which may contradicts to a common misperception that the bigger volume guarantees more benefit. Grounded on a game-theoretic model, we analyze a monopolistic e-tailer's decision on the optimal volume of data to collect and the price of the product to sell in the presence of two different types of customers in terms of their privacy-sensitivity. Our preliminary results show how the number of privacy-sensitive customers and their utility loss influence the optimal information level and the price. We then explore the welfare implications by comparing the profit-maximizing data volume with welfare-maximizing level. We aim to contribute to the literature by characterizing the optimal volume of big data while modelling customers' privacy-sensitivity. In the presence of privacy and cost challenges, our results may give them implications for strategic decision-making for practitioners and policy makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonyoung Koo & Seung Ho Yoo & Byung Cho Kim, 2017. "The bigger, the better? An investigation of optimal volume of big data," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(2), pages 871-879.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-16-00552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2017/Volume37/EB-17-V37-I2-P77.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biais, Bruno & Glosten, Larry & Spatt, Chester, 2005. "Market microstructure: A survey of microfoundations, empirical results, and policy implications," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 217-264, May.
    2. Madhavan, Ananth, 2000. "Market microstructure: A survey," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 205-258, August.
    3. Kei Kawakami, 2013. "Optimal Market Size," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1168, The University of Melbourne.
    4. Spiegel, Matthew & Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar, 1992. "Informed Speculation and Hedging in a Noncompetitive Securities Market," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 5(2), pages 307-329.
    5. Hazen, Benjamin T. & Boone, Christopher A. & Ezell, Jeremy D. & Jones-Farmer, L. Allison, 2014. "Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 72-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kei Kawakami, 2014. "Information Aggregation and Optimal Market Size," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1182, The University of Melbourne.
    2. Kei Kawakami, 2017. "Welfare Consequences of Information Aggregation and Optimal Market Size," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 303-323, November.
    3. Kei Kawakami, 2013. "Optimal Market Size," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1168, The University of Melbourne.
    4. Carol Osler, 2012. "Market Microstructure and the Profitability of Currency Trading," Working Papers 48, Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School.
    5. Luitgard Veraart, 2010. "Optimal Market Making in the Foreign Exchange Market," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 359-372.
    6. Wong, Woon K. & Liu, Bo & Zeng, Yong, 2009. "Can price limits help when the price is falling? Evidence from transactions data on the Shanghai Stock Exchange," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 91-102, March.
    7. Michael McAleer & Marcelo C. Medeiros, 2009. "Forecasting Realized Volatility with Linear and Nonlinear Models," CARF F-Series CARF-F-189, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    8. Michele Manna & Stefano Nobili, 2023. "Banks' holdings of and trading in government bonds," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 257-283, January.
    9. Degryse, H.A. & van Achter, M. & Wuyts, G., 2012. "Internalization, Clearing and Settlement, and Liquidity," Other publications TiSEM 3744cb8d-b4ce-47a1-9abd-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Cantillon, Estelle & Yin, Pai-Ling, 2011. "Competition between exchanges: A research agenda," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 329-336, May.
    11. PASCUAL, Roberto & VEREDAS, David, 2006. "Does the open limit order book matter in explaining long run volatility ?," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006110, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    12. G. Wuyts, 2007. "Stock Market Liquidity.Determinants and Implications," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(2), pages 279-316.
    13. Susanne Cannon & Rebel Cole, 2011. "Changes in REIT Liquidity 1988–2007: Evidence from Daily Data," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 258-280, July.
    14. Mao, Wen & Pagano, Michael S., 2011. "Specialists as risk managers: The competition between intermediated and non-intermediated markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 51-66, January.
    15. Vayanos, Dimitri & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Market Liquidity—Theory and Empirical Evidence ," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1289-1361, Elsevier.
    16. Ozsoylev, Han N. & Takayama, Shino, 2010. "Price, trade size, and information revelation in multi-period securities markets," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 49-76, February.
    17. Kumar, Dilip, 2017. "Realized volatility transmission from crude oil to equity sectors: A study with economic significance analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 149-167.
    18. Willis, Geoff, 2011. "Why money trickles up – wealth & income distributions," MPRA Paper 30851, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Jérémy Ducros & Angelo Riva, 2018. "The Lyon Stock Exchange: The Survival of the Fittest (1866-1914)," PSE Working Papers halshs-01800720, HAL.
    20. Gian Piero Aielli & Davide Pirino, 2023. "Funding Liquidity and Stocks’ Market Liquidity: Structural Estimation From High-Frequency Data," CEIS Research Paper 568, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 28 Nov 2023.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Big data; privacy; pricing; welfare; game theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-16-00552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.