A new look at the trickle-down effect in the united states economy
This paper is a further investigation of the trickle-down theory. In addition to using more recent data, we use a methodology that examines some questions not previously addressed in the literature. The results suggest that an increase in wage leads to a more equal income distribution. The findings also indicate that there is no ¡°trickle-down¡± from proprietors¡¯ income and corporate profits to lower income group.
Volume (Year): 29 (2009)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| |
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Kiminori Matsuyama, 1998.
1238, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Patricia Ruggles & Charles F. Stone, 1992. "Income distribution over the business cycle: The 1980s were different," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 709-715.
- Richard C. Michel, 1991. "Economic growth and income equality since the 1982 recession," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 181-203.
- Arndt, H W, 1983. "The "Trickle-Down" Myth," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(1), pages 1-10, October.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-08i30027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John P. Conley)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.