IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebi/jiesad/v1y2024i3p121-139.html

Institutional Diversity, Sharia Principles, and CSR Practices in MENA: A Critical Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Haija Nasrallah

    (University of Sharjah, College of Business Administration, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates)

  • Hudaifah Shehadieh

    (American University of Beirut, Sekolah Bisnis Olayan, Riad El-Solh 1107, Beirut, Lebanon)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this research is to substantiate the nexus between institutional diversity and Sharia-compliant principles with CSR across MENA. The objective is to have a means of assessing CSR strategies across countries with different institutional environments in place, taking into consideration the political, economic and cultural aspects that have an impact. Methods: This study used mixed-methods, employing primary data through structured surveys of 300 firms in the MENA region (2020-2023) and secondary data through governance and economic indicators as well as corporate annual reports and Islamic financial services databases. Conducted data analysis using statistical methods such as regression analysis and comparative frameworks. Results: The results show that institutional factors are a significant driver of MENA CSR practices including political regimes, economic dependencies (oil vs. non-oil economies) and if the CSR practice aligns with the principles of Sharia. For countries that have centralized governance (e.g. GCC) CSR practices were more formalized and integrated into the strategic planning process, while those who have fragmented institutional environments (e.g. Egypt) focus on localized and under-coordinated approaches. Innovation: This study presents a unique comparative perspective on CSR in MENA, emphasizing the influence of Sharia on CSR alongside traditional institutional determinants, and providing fresh perspectives on continental CSR. Policy and Research Implications: An analytical implication of this study can be of importance to governments and businesses alike, as it strengthens the importance of aligning the institutional realities and cultural values with CSR strategies, which could enhance the overall sustainability and corporate governance practices in the MENA region

Suggested Citation

  • Haija Nasrallah & Hudaifah Shehadieh, 2024. "Institutional Diversity, Sharia Principles, and CSR Practices in MENA: A Critical Comparative Analysis," Jurnal International Economic Sharia, PT. Inovasi Analisis Data, vol. 1(3), pages 121-139.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebi:jiesad:v:1:y:2024:i:3:p:121-139
    DOI: 10.69725/jies.v1i3.141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://analysisdata.co.id/index.php/JIES/article/view/141
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://analysisdata.co.id/index.php/JIES/article/download/141/138
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.69725/jies.v1i3.141?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang, H. & Marquis, C. & Renneboog, L.D.R. & Li Sun, Sunny, 2014. "Speaking of Corporate Social Responsibility," Discussion Paper 2014-018, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    2. Kim, Yongtae & Li, Haidan & Li, Siqi, 2014. "Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Jamali, Dima & Jain, Tanusree & Samara, Georges & Zoghbi, Edwina, 2020. "How institutions affect CSR practices in the Middle East and North Africa: A critical review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    4. Petya Koleva, 2021. "Towards the Development of an Empirical Model for Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Middle East," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 789-813, July.
    5. Yunhee Kim & Christian Brodhag & Desta Mebratu, 2014. "Corporate social responsibility driven innovation," Post-Print emse-01009999, HAL.
    6. Dongyong Zhang & Stephen Morse & Uma Kambhamptati & Bingjun Li, 2014. "Evolving Corporate Social Responsibility in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Elbanna, Said & Abdelzaher, Dina M. & Ramadan, Nora, 2020. "Management research in the Arab World: What is now and what is next?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(2).
    8. Sam Yoonsuk Lee & Ambigaibalan Ramasamy & Jay Hyuk Rhee, 2014. "Best Practices Among Corporate Social Responsibility Leaders in China," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Green Leadership in China, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 7-62, Springer.
    9. Kim, Chung Hee & Amaeshi, Kenneth & Harris, Simon & Suh, Chang-Jin, 2013. "CSR and the national institutional context: The case of South Korea," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2581-2591.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alla Mostepaniuk & Elsie Nasr & Razan Ibrahim Awwad & Sameer Hamdan & Hasan Yousef Aljuhmani, 2022. "Managing a Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Dima Jamali & Georges Samara & Lokman I. Meho, 2024. "Determinants of research productivity and efficiency among the Arab world’s accredited business schools," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2511-2543, December.
    3. Nguyen Minh & Majid Khan & Jo Bensemann & Rahizah Sulaiman, 2025. "Corporate social responsibility among service sector SMEs in Vietnam: exploring the influence of national context," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 3977-4001, October.
    4. Petya Koleva & Maureen Meadows & Ahmed Elmasry, 2023. "The influence of Islam in shaping organisational socially responsible behaviour," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1001-1019, July.
    5. Galloppo, Giuseppe & Guida, Roberto & Paimanova, Viktoriia & Urbani, Roberto, 2026. "Green innovation is the need of the hour: the role of regional-level framework and institutional investor types," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Shantanu Dutta & Supriya Katti & B. V. Phani & Pengcheng Zhu, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility spending as a building block for sustainable corporate ethical identity: Lessons from Indian business groups," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 696-717, April.
    7. Dorota Dobija & Claudia Arena & Łukasz Kozłowski & Joanna Krasodomska & Justyna Godawska, 2023. "Towards sustainable development: The role of directors' international orientation and their diversity for non‐financial disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 66-90, January.
    8. Andrzej R. Stopczyński, 2020. "Banki na progu upadłości – refleksje nad postępowaniem," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 51(5), pages 517-548.
    9. Ephraim Kwashie Thompson, 2025. "ESG and stock price crash risk mitigation: evidence from Korea," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Rizwan Ali & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Talles Vianna Brugni & Jinsoo Hwang & Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Thai Hong Thuy Khanh, 2019. "Does CSR Moderate the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Chinese Firm’s Financial Performance? Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Adriana Burlea-Schiopoiu & Laurentiu Stelian Mihai, 2019. "An Integrated Framework on the Sustainability of SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Sora Kang & Su Jin Han & Jounghae Bang, 2018. "The Fit between Employees’ Perception and the Organization’s Behavior in Terms of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Ephraim Kwashie Thompson, 2026. "Nonlinear Insights Into the ESG–Crash Risk Dynamics From a Machine Learning Perspective: Evidence From an Emerging‐Transition Market," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 381-398, January.
    14. Wei, Lang & Zhang, Yiling, 2023. "Nonfinancial indicators in identifying stock price crash risk," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    15. Xueyan Dong & Jingyu Gao & Sunny Li Sun & Kangtao Ye, 2021. "Doing extreme by doing good," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 291-315, March.
    16. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Keke Song, 2021. "The Role of Ethical Standards in the Relationship Between Religious Social Norms and M&A Announcement Returns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 721-742, May.
    17. Zhu, Bo & Wang, Yiwei, 2024. "Green governance and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    18. Magdalena Marczewska & Scott W. Hegerty & Roma Panwar & Mariusz Kostrzewski, 2026. "Digital transformation, ESG, and companies’ performance: an exploratory study of the European food sector," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1798-1819, June.
    19. Feng, Jingwen & Goodell, John W. & Shen, Dehua, 2022. "ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    20. Meles, Antonio & Salerno, Dario & Sampagnaro, Gabriele & Verdoliva, Vincenzo & Zhang, Jianing, 2023. "The influence of green innovation on default risk: Evidence from Europe," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 692-710.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebi:jiesad:v:1:y:2024:i:3:p:121-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Agus Dwianto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://analysisdata.co.id/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.