IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/92-27-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grüne Präferenzen: Unternehmen schützen Gewinne aus nicht-grünen Produkten durch mehr Lobbyarbeit

Author

Listed:
  • Olimpia Cutinelli-Rendina
  • Sonja Dobkowitz

Abstract

Ein Anstieg der Nachfrage nach umweltfreundlichen Produkten bedeutet oftmals auch einen Rückgang der Nachfrage nach emissionsintensiven Produkten. Für die betroffenen Unternehmen hat dies einen Einbruch bisheriger Einnahmequellen zur Folge. Anhand der Automobilbranche in den USA zeigt dieser Bericht, dass Lobbyausgaben gegen Umweltschutz als Reaktion auf eine grünere Nachfrage zunehmen. Auf diese Weise versuchen Unternehmen ihre Gewinne aus dem Verkauf konventioneller Produkte zu schützen. Zwar nutzen alle Unternehmen Lobbyismus gegen Umweltschutz, aber Unternehmen mit einem hohen Anteil von Verbrennungsmotoren in ihrem Produktportfolio erhöhen ihre Ausgaben besonders stark. Dies vergrößert ein mögliches Ungleichgewicht zugunsten von Lobbyismus gegen Umweltschutz. Die Politik sollte diesen Fallstrick eines gestiegenen Umweltbewusstseins berücksichtigen und ihm durch striktere Transparenzvorgaben und Verhaltenskodizes für Politiker*innen entgegenwirken, wenn sie Haushalte zu einem umweltfreundlicheren Konsumverhalten ermuntert.

Suggested Citation

  • Olimpia Cutinelli-Rendina & Sonja Dobkowitz, 2025. "Grüne Präferenzen: Unternehmen schützen Gewinne aus nicht-grünen Produkten durch mehr Lobbyarbeit," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 92(27/28), pages 435-440.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:92-27-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.967014.de/25-27-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyle C. Meng & Ashwin Rode, 2019. "The social cost of lobbying over climate policy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(6), pages 472-476, June.
    2. Sonja Dobkowitz, 2025. "„Grüne“ Einstellungen von Verbraucher*innen sind effektive Stellschraube für mehr Umweltschutz," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 92(23), pages 335-341.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sterner, Thomas & Ewald, Jens & Sterner, Erik, 2024. "Economists and the climate," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Lackner, Teresa & Fierro, Luca E. & Mellacher, Patrick, 2025. "Opinion dynamics meet agent-based climate economics: An integrated analysis of carbon taxation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Preuss, Susanne & Max, Malte M., 2024. "Do firms put their money where their mouth is? Sociopolitical claims and corporate political activity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Choi, Pak-Sing & Espinola-Arredondo, Ana & Munoz-Garcia, Felix, 2024. "Environmental regulation under sequential competition," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 52-72.
    5. Rafaty, R. & Dolphin, G. & Pretis, F., 2020. "Carbon pricing and the elasticity of CO2 emissions," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 20116, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    6. Srivastav, Sugandha & Rafaty, Ryan, 2021. "Five Worlds of Political Strategy in the Climate Movement," INET Oxford Working Papers 2021-07, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    7. Shan, Rui & Kittner, Noah, 2025. "Sector-specific strategies to increase green hydrogen adoption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    8. Rahman, Sohanur & Sinnewe, Elisabeth & Chapple, Larelle, 2024. "Environment-specific political risk discourse and expected crash risk: The role of political activism," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    9. Mehling, M. A., 2023. "Supply-Side crediting for accelerated decarbonization: A political economy perspective," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2346, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    10. Thieme, Sebastian, 2024. "(When) are Lobbying Expenditures a Good Proxy for Lobbying Activity?," IAST Working Papers 24-160, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    11. Yali Yi & Pelin Demirel, 2023. "The impact of sustainability‐oriented dynamic capabilities on firm growth: Investigating the green supply chain management and green political capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5873-5888, December.
    12. Shafiullah, Muhammad & Miah, Mohammad Dulal & Alam, Md Samsul & Atif, Muhammad, 2021. "Does economic policy uncertainty affect renewable energy consumption?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1500-1521.
    13. Olimpia Cutinelli Rendina & Sonja Dobkowitz & Antoine Mayerowitz, 2024. "Environmentally-Responsible Demand: Irresponsible Lobbying? ," Post-Print hal-04502992, HAL.
    14. repec:osf:osfxxx:y74uh_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Réka Juhász & Nathan Lane, 2024. "The Political Economy of Industrial Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 38(4), pages 27-54, Fall.
    16. Hennicke, Moritz & Blanga-Gubbay, Michael, 2023. "Betting on the Wrong Horse: Lobbying on TPP and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election," OSF Preprints zcwsn, Center for Open Science.
    17. Kristian S. Nielsen & Kimberly A. Nicholas & Felix Creutzig & Thomas Dietz & Paul C. Stern, 2021. "The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1011-1016, November.
    18. Kakuho Furukawa & Hibiki Ichiue & Noriyuki Shiraki, 2020. "How Does Climate Change Interact with the Financial System? A Survey," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 20-E-8, Bank of Japan.
    19. Achim Hagen & Karen Pittel, 2021. "Chancen und Risiken klimapolitischer Langfriststrategien am Beispiel des deutschen Klimaschutzgesetzes," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(5), pages 334-338, May.
    20. Renae Marshall & Matthew G. Burgess, 2022. "Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 1-22, March.
    21. Olimpia Cutinelli-Rendina & Sonja Dobkowitz & Antoine Mayerowitz, 2025. "Environmentally-Responsible Households: Irresponsible Corporate Lobbying," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2025-01, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D9 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • P28 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Natural Resources; Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:92-27-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.