IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Elección teórica en economía: el caso de las teorías de crecimiento de Solow, Romer y Ramsey

  • Néstor Garza

    ()

  • Gisell Pugliese

    ()

Registered author(s):

    Elegir paradigmas teóricos no es una tarea fácil para los economistas, ya que siempre enfrentan unadisyuntiva: la que existe entre las virtudes epistémicas sintácticas (parsimonia, generalidad, poder unificador, etcétera) y las virtudes epistémicas semánticas (la relación de las teorías con la evidencia). En este trabajo se explora el proceso de elección teórica en el desarrollo de la teoría de crecimiento (Solow, Romer y Ramsey). Haciendo comparaciones uno-a-uno se evalúan la forma y el contenido de estas teorías. De esta manera se identifican las virtudes epistémicas sobre las que el economista se orienta cuando elige -para este caso- entre dos teorías del crecimiento.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.fce.unal.edu.co/media/files/documentos/Cuadernos/50/v28n50_garza_2009.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by UN - RCE - CID in its journal REVISTA CUADERNOS DE ECONOMÍA.

    Volume (Year): (2009)
    Issue (Month): ()
    Pages:

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:col:000093:005893
    Contact details of provider:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Quah, Danny T, 1996. "Twin Peaks: Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 106(437), pages 1045-55, July.
    2. Kalaitzidakis, P. & Mamuneas, T.P. & Stengos, T., 2003. "Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions," Working Papers 2003-8, University of Guelph, Department of Economics and Finance.
    3. N. Gregory Mankiw & David Romer & David N. Weil, 1990. "A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth," NBER Working Papers 3541, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Boris Salazar & Andrés Cendales, 2007. "Koopmans: Estructura Modular Y Estrategias Ganadoras En Teoría Económica," REVISTA CUADERNOS DE ECONOMÍA, UN - RCE - CID.
    5. Álvaro Gallardo, 2004. "Historia del pensamiento económico y progreso de la ciencia económica. Una perspectiva pluralista," REVISTA CUADERNOS DE ECONOMÍA, UN - RCE - CID.
    6. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-37, October.
    7. Ivan Moscati, 2007. "History of consumer demand theory 1871�-�1971: A Neo-Kantian rational reconstruction," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 119-156.
    8. Jonathan Temple, 1999. "The New Growth Evidence," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 37(1), pages 112-156, March.
    9. Pantelis Kalaitzidakis & Theofanis P. Mamuneas & Thanasis Stengos, 2003. "Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(6), pages 1346-1366, December.
    10. BAUWENS, Luc & KIRMAN, Alan & LUBRANO, Michel & PROTOPOPESCU, Camelia, 2003. "Ranking economics departments in Europe: a statistical approach," CORE Discussion Papers 2003050, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    11. Danny Quah, 1996. "Twin Peaks: Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics," CEP Discussion Papers dp0280, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    12. Tony Lawson, 1994. "Why are so many economists so opposed to methodology?," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 105-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000093:005893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vladimir Leonardo Celis Agudelo)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.