Author
Listed:
- Sebastian Svenberg
(Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
- Anna Davidsson
(Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
- Sofia Strid
(Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
- Christopher Ali Thorén
(Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
- Martin Hultman
(Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
Abstract
This article critically explores vulnerability as a key concept for analysing structural inequality. Drawing on 402 narrative interviews across 30 European NUTS2 regions, it examines how governance barriers hinder a just transition. The interviews capture diverse positions in terms of age, class, gender, occupation, place of residence, migration patterns, etc., asking how green and digital transitions affect everyday life. Empirically, the article advances two core arguments: First, vulnerability is not a stable identifier but a contingent, relational, and processual condition that emerges across situations and temporal trajectories. Second, the twin green and digital transition reshapes vulnerability in unpredictable ways, as policies and transition processes transform socio-economic and socio-technical relations, generating new forms of agency and vulnerability. The findings show that processual vulnerability involves accommodation, resistance, negotiation, and everyday reconfiguration, offering insights into how vulnerability can be approached not as a stable identifier or statistical category, but as a process. The results are relevant for qualitative and quantitative studies of the twin transition.
Suggested Citation
Sebastian Svenberg & Anna Davidsson & Sofia Strid & Christopher Ali Thorén & Martin Hultman, 2026.
"The Processual Character of Vulnerability: Overcoming Conceptual Barriers Hindering Knowledge for a Just Twin Transition,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:12285
DOI: 10.17645/pag.12285
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:12285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.