IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cha/ysa001/v3y2010i1p157-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risikoneigung und Risikoverhalten von Milch-erzeugern: Eine Typologisierung

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Schaper

    (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)

  • Ludwig Theuvsen

    (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)

  • Achim Spiller

    (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)

Abstract

Landwirtschaftliche Betriebe sehen sich u. a. aufgrund fort-schreitender Spezialisierung, der Liberalisierung der Weltagrar-märkte sowie den Folgen des globalen Klimawandels steigenden Risiken ausgesetzt. Fragen des betrieblichen Risikomanagements zur Sicherung von Liquidität und Rentabilität gewinnen daher zu-nehmend an Bedeutung. In der agrarökonomischen Literatur fin-den sich verschiedene wissenschaftliche Beiträge, die sich vor allem mit dem Umgang, der Handhabung und der Analyse von Ri-siken beschäftigen. Die Einstellungen und das Verhalten von Landwirten in Bezug auf Risiken sind jedoch bisher nur vereinzelt analysiert worden. Vor diesem Hintergrund untersucht der vorlie-gende Beitrag auf der Grundlage einer Befragung von 236 land-wirtschaftlichen Betrieben aus einer verhaltenswissenschaftlichen Perspektive die Risikoneigung und das Risikoverhalten von Milch-erzeugern. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass unter den befragten Be-triebsleitern verschiedene Risikotypen existieren, die sich hin-sichtlich ihres Risikoverhaltens, der Betriebsleiterpersönlichkeit und der Strategiewahl voneinander unterscheiden.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Schaper & Ludwig Theuvsen & Achim Spiller, 2010. "Risikoneigung und Risikoverhalten von Milch-erzeugern: Eine Typologisierung," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 3(1), pages 157-193.
  • Handle: RePEc:cha:ysa001:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:157-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://archive.jsagr.org/v3/YSA2010_6_Schaper_Spiller_157_193.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pflugfelder, R., 1991. "Der Beitrag von Warenterminbörsen zur Informationsverbesserung und Risikoabsicherung bei Agrarprodukten," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 27.
    2. Brümmer, Bernhard & Loy, Jens-Peter & Struve, Carsten, 2003. "Beurteilung des Milchquotenbörsensystems in Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(06), pages 1-14.
    3. Bahrs, E., 2001. "Methoden des Rechnungswesens als Instrumente des Risikomanagements in der Landwirtschaft," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    4. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Huirne, Ruud B.M. & Hardaker, J. Brian, 1999. "Perceptions Of Risks And Risk Management Strategies; An Analysis Of Dutch Livestock Farmers," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21507, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Voss, J. & Schaper, C. & Spiller, A. & Theuvsen, L., 2009. "Innovationsverhalten in der deutschen Landwirtschaft – Empirische Ergebnisse am Beispiel der Biogasproduktion," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44, March.
    7. Nemessalyi, Zsolt & Madai, Hajnalka & Nabradi, Andras, 2004. "Risk And Risk Management In Hungarian Livestock Production With A Special Regard To Sheep Production," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20233, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Wocken, C. & Schaper, C. & Lassen, B. & Spiller, A. & Theuvsen, L., 2009. "Risikowahrnehmung in Milchviehbetrieben: Eine empirische Studie zur vergleichenden Bewertung von Politik-, Markt- und Produktionsrisiken," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44, March.
    9. Musshoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin & Xu, Wei, 2005. "Zur Bewertung von Wetterderivaten als innovative Risikomanagementinstrumente in der Landwirtschaft," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 54(04), pages 1-13.
    10. Gudbrand Lien & Ola Flaten & Anne Moxnes Jervell & Martha Ebbesvik & Matthias Koesling & Paul Steinar Valle, 2006. "Management and Risk Characteristics of Part-Time and Full-Time Farmers in Norway," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(1), pages 111-131.
    11. Granoszewski, Karol & Reise, Christian & Spiller, Achim & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2009. "Entscheidungsverhalten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter bei Bioenergie-Investitionen: erste Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung," DARE Discussion Papers 0911, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    12. David C. Hall & Thomas O. Knight & Keith H. Coble & Alan E. Baquet & George F. Patrick, 2003. "Analysis of Beef Producers' Risk Management Perceptions and Desire for Further Risk Management Education," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 430-448.
    13. Bahlmann, Jan & Spiller, Achim & Plumeyer, Cord-Herwig, 2009. "Status quo und Akzeptanz von Internet-basierten Informationssystemen: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Analyse in der deutschen Veredelungswirtschaft," DARE Discussion Papers 0901, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    14. Granoszewski, Karol & Reise, Christian & Spiller, Achim & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2009. "Entscheidungsverhalten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter bei Bioenergie-Investitionen," 54th Annual Conference, Goettingen, Germany, September 17-19, 2014 187307, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    15. Pannell, David J. & Malcolm, Bill & Kingwell, Ross S., 2000. "Are we risking too much? Perspectives on risk in farm modelling," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 69-78, June.
    16. Berg, Ernst & Schmitz, Bernhard & Starp, Michael & Trenkel, Hermann, 2005. "Wetterderivate: Ein Instrument im Risikomanagement für die Landwirtschaft?," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 54(03), pages 1-13.
    17. Granoszewski, Karol & Reise, Christian & Spiller, Achim & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2009. "Entscheidungsverhalten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter bei Bioenergie-Investitionen," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 187307, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    18. Jeffrey M. Peterson & Richard N. Boisvert, 2004. "Incentive-Compatible Pollution Control Policies under Asymmetric Information on Both Risk Preferences and Technology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(2), pages 291-306.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Risks and risk management in agriculture," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 13(28), pages 1-13, December.
    2. repec:zbw:inwedp:592016 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Sören Mohrmann & Verena Otter, 2022. "Categorisation of Biogas Plant Operators in Germany with Regards to Their Intention to Use Straw Pellets as Innovative and Sustainable Substrate Alternative," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Manuela Larcher & Martin Schönhart & Erwin Schmid, 2016. "Risikobewertung und Risikomanagement landwirtschaftlicher BetriebsleiterInnen in Österreich – deskriptive Befragungsergebnisse 2015," Working Papers 592016, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    5. Bronsema, Hauke & Sonntag, Winnie & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Determinanten der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit von Milchviehbetrieben außerhalb von Erzeugungszentren," 53rd Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 25-27, 2013 156122, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    6. Mohrmann, Sören & Schaper, Christian & Otter, Verena, 2022. "Strohpellets als innovatives Alternativsubstrat in der Biogasproduktion: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Analyse," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329607, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    7. Beer, Lara & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2020. "Factors influencing German farmer’s decision to grow alley cropping systems as ecological focus areas: a regression analysis," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    8. Larcher, Manuela & Schönhart, Martin & Schmid, Erwin, 2016. "Risikobewertung und Risikomanagement landwirtschaftlicher BetriebsleiterInnen in Österreich – deskriptive Befragungsergebnisse 2015," Discussion Papers DP-59-2016, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beer, Lara & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2020. "Factors influencing German farmer’s decision to grow alley cropping systems as ecological focus areas: a regression analysis," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    2. Wocken, C. & Schaper, C. & Lassen, B. & Spiller, A. & Theuvsen, L., 2009. "Risikowahrnehmung in Milchviehbetrieben: Eine empirische Studie zur vergleichenden Bewertung von Politik-, Markt- und Produktionsrisiken," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44, March.
    3. Emmann, Carsten H. & Arens, Ludwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Individual acceptance of the biogas innovation: A structural equation model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-378.
    4. Lemken, D. & Stolze, K. & Wille, C.S., 2017. "Welche Faktoren beeinflussen den Roggeneinsatz in der Schweinefütterung? Eine empirische Analyse von deutschen Schweinehaltern," Department of Agricultural and Rural Development (DARE) Discussion Papers 261096, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    5. Wille, Stefan Clemens & Lemken, Dominic & Stolze, Kristof, 2017. "Welche Faktoren Beeinflussen Den Roggeneinsatz In Der Schweinefütterung? Eine Empirische Analyse Von Deutschen Schweinehaltern," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 261997, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    6. Mohrmann, Sören & Steins, Aaron & Schaper, Christian, 2021. "Erfolgsfaktoren und Zukunftsaussichten für eine wirtschaftliche Biogasproduktion in Deutschland - Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317072, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    7. Bishu, Kinfe & O'Reilly, Seamus & Lahiff, Edward & Steiner, Bodo, 2016. "Cattle farmers’ perceptions of risk and risk management strategies," MPRA Paper 74954, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Christian Schaper & Christina Beitzen-Heineke & Ludwig Theuvsen, 2008. "Finanzierung und Organisation landwirtschaftlicher Biogasanlagen: Eine empirische Untersuchung," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 1(1), pages 39-74.
    9. Larcher, Manuela & Schönhart, Martin & Schmid, Erwin, 2016. "Risikobewertung und Risikomanagement landwirtschaftlicher BetriebsleiterInnen in Österreich – deskriptive Befragungsergebnisse 2015," Discussion Papers DP-59-2016, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    10. Mußhoff, Oliver & Grüner, Sven & Hirschauer, Norbert, 2014. "Muss man begrenzte Rationalität und heuristisches Entscheiden bei der Erklärung für die Verbreitung von Wetterindexversicherungen in der Landwirtschaft berücksichtigen? – Eine Untersuchung auf d," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 63(2).
    11. Manuela Larcher & Martin Schönhart & Erwin Schmid, 2016. "Risikobewertung und Risikomanagement landwirtschaftlicher BetriebsleiterInnen in Österreich – deskriptive Befragungsergebnisse 2015," Working Papers 592016, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    12. Mußhoff, O. & Odenin, M. & Wei, X., 2007. "Zur Quantifizierung des Basisrisikos von Wetterderivaten," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 42, March.
    13. repec:zbw:inwedp:592016 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mußhoff, Oliver & Grüner, Sven & Hirschauer, Norbert, 2014. "Muss man begrenzte Rationalität und heuristisches Entscheiden bei der Erklärung für die Verbreitung von Wetterindexversicherungen in der Landwirtschaft berücksichtigen? – Eine Untersuchung auf der Bas," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 63(02), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Hellberg-Bahr, A. & Steffen, N. & Spiller, A., 2012. "Unternehmensstrategie Defizite in Genossenschaftsmolkereien: Eine mitgliederbasierte Fallstudie," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    16. Muhammad Amjed Iqbal & Azhar Abbas & Syed Asif Ali Naqvi & Muhammad Rizwan & Abdus Samie & Umar Ijaz Ahmed, 2020. "Drivers of Farm Households’ Perceived Risk Sources and Factors Affecting Uptake of Mitigation Strategies in Punjab Pakistan: Implications for Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.
    18. Herrmann, Tabea & Hübler, Olaf & Menkhoff, Lukas & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2016. "Allais for the poor," Kiel Working Papers 2036, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    19. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.
    20. Berg, Joyce E. & Rietz, Thomas A., 2019. "Longshots, overconfidence and efficiency on the Iowa Electronic Market," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 271-287.
    21. Reckers, Philip M.J. & Sanders, Debra L. & Roark, Stephen J., 1994. "The Influence of Ethical Attitudes on Taxpayer Compliance," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 47(4), pages 825-836, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risiken; Risikotypologie; Risikoneigung; Milcherzeuger;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q19 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cha:ysa001:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:157-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Briner (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jsagr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.