IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Risikoneigung und Risikoverhalten von Milch-erzeugern: Eine Typologisierung

  • Christian Schaper

    (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)

  • Ludwig Theuvsen

    (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)

  • Achim Spiller

    (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)

Registered author(s):

    Landwirtschaftliche Betriebe sehen sich u. a. aufgrund fort-schreitender Spezialisierung, der Liberalisierung der Weltagrar-märkte sowie den Folgen des globalen Klimawandels steigenden Risiken ausgesetzt. Fragen des betrieblichen Risikomanagements zur Sicherung von Liquidität und Rentabilität gewinnen daher zu-nehmend an Bedeutung. In der agrarökonomischen Literatur fin-den sich verschiedene wissenschaftliche Beiträge, die sich vor allem mit dem Umgang, der Handhabung und der Analyse von Ri-siken beschäftigen. Die Einstellungen und das Verhalten von Landwirten in Bezug auf Risiken sind jedoch bisher nur vereinzelt analysiert worden. Vor diesem Hintergrund untersucht der vorlie-gende Beitrag auf der Grundlage einer Befragung von 236 land-wirtschaftlichen Betrieben aus einer verhaltenswissenschaftlichen Perspektive die Risikoneigung und das Risikoverhalten von Milch-erzeugern. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass unter den befragten Be-triebsleitern verschiedene Risikotypen existieren, die sich hin-sichtlich ihres Risikoverhaltens, der Betriebsleiterpersönlichkeit und der Strategiewahl voneinander unterscheiden.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://archive.jsagr.org/v3/YSA2010_6_Schaper_Spiller_157_193.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology in its journal Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture).

    Volume (Year): 3 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 157-193

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cha:ysa001:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:157-193
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://jsagr.org

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Granoszewski, Karol & Reise, Christian & Spiller, Achim & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2009. "Entscheidungsverhalten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebsleiter bei Bioenergie-Investitionen: erste Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung," DARE Discussion Papers 0911, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    2. Jeffrey M. Peterson & Richard N. Boisvert, 2004. "Incentive-Compatible Pollution Control Policies under Asymmetric Information on Both Risk Preferences and Technology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(2), pages 291-306.
    3. Nemessalyi, Zsolt & Madai, Hajnalka & Nabradi, Andras, 2004. "Risk And Risk Management In Hungarian Livestock Production With A Special Regard To Sheep Production," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20233, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Pannell, David J. & Malcolm, Bill & Kingwell, Ross S., 2000. "Are we risking too much? Perspectives on risk in farm modelling," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 69-78, June.
    5. Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos, 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 263-91, March.
    6. Gudbrand Lien & Ola Flaten & Anne Moxnes Jervell & Martha Ebbesvik & Matthias Koesling & Paul Steinar Valle, 2006. "Management and Risk Characteristics of Part-Time and Full-Time Farmers in Norway," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(1), pages 111-131.
    7. Brümmer, Bernhard & Loy, Jens-Peter & Struve, Carsten, 2003. "Beurteilung des Milchquotenbörsensystems in Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(6).
    8. Berg, Ernst & Schmitz, Bernhard & Starp, Michael & Trenkel, Hermann, 2005. "Wetterderivate: Ein Instrument im Risikomanagement für die Landwirtschaft?," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 54(3).
    9. Musshoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin & Xu, Wei, 2005. "Zur Bewertung von Wetterderivaten als innovative Risikomanagementinstrumente in der Landwirtschaft," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 54(4).
    10. David C. Hall & Thomas O. Knight & Keith H. Coble & Alan E. Baquet & George F. Patrick, 2003. "Analysis of Beef Producers' Risk Management Perceptions and Desire for Further Risk Management Education," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 430-448.
    11. Bahlmann, Jan & Spiller, Achim & Plumeyer, Cord-Herwig, 2009. "Status quo und Akzeptanz von Internet-basierten Informationssystemen: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Analyse in der deutschen Veredelungswirtschaft," DARE Discussion Papers 0901, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    12. Voss, Julian & Schaper, Christian & Spiller, Achim & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2008. "Innovationsverhalten In Der Deutschen Landwirtschaft – Empirische Ergebnisse Am Beispiel Der Biogasproduktion," 48th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 24-26, 2008 52666, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cha:ysa001:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:157-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simon Briner)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.