IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea99/21507.html

Perceptions Of Risks And Risk Management Strategies; An Analysis Of Dutch Livestock Farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Meuwissen, Miranda P.M.
  • Huirne, Ruud B.M.
  • Hardaker, J. Brian

Abstract

The risk environment of farmers is changing and new risk management strategies are being introduced. Beal (1996) stated that risk management strategies adopted by farmers will be in accordance with their personal preferences for risk. In this context it would be useful for developers and sellers of new risk management strategies to have insight into farmers' preferences for risk. This paper studies to what extent such preferences are farmer-specific or whether general relationships exist. By means of a large questionnaire survey among 2700 livestock farmers in the Netherlands we gathered data on four groups of variables, i.e. socioeconomic characteristics of the farm, farmers' attitudes towards risk, their perceptions of sources of risk, and their perceptions of risk management strategies. Various techniques of multivariate data analyses have been used to analyse the relationships between these groups of variables. Many significant relationships were found (although not to a great extent for attitudes towards risk). However, we are cautious in recommending that new risk management strategies need to be fully fine-tuned to aspects analysed in this study. Low values of the adjusted R-squared indicate that there are still other (possibly even more personal) aspects that determine the final perception of a farmer of a risk management instrument. In addition, results of this study reflect farmers' perceptions of risk management strategies, which is not necessarily the same as the extent to which they would actually use such strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Huirne, Ruud B.M. & Hardaker, J. Brian, 1999. "Perceptions Of Risks And Risk Management Strategies; An Analysis Of Dutch Livestock Farmers," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21507, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea99:21507
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.21507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/21507/files/sp99me02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.21507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodwin, Barry K. & Ker, Alan P., 1998. "Revenue Insurance: A New Dimension in Risk Management," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 13(4), pages 1-4.
    2. repec:cup:jagaec:v:17:y:1985:i:02:p:231-238_02 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:cup:jagaec:v:17:y:1985:i:02:p:105-116_02 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Skees, Jerry R. & Harwood, Joy & Somwaru, Agapi & Perry, Janet, 1998. "The Potential for Revenue Insurance Policies in the South," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 47-61, July.
    5. Boggess, William G. & Anaman, Kwabena A. & Hanson, Gregory D., 1985. "Importance, Causes, And Management Responses To Farm Risks: Evidence From Florida And Alabama," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Steven C. Blank, 1995. "The new risk environment in California agriculture," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 155-168.
    7. Patrick, George F. & Wilson, Paul N. & Barry, Peter J. & Boggess, William G. & Young, Douglas L., 1985. "Risk Perceptions And Management Responses: Producer-Generated Hypotheses For Risk Modeling," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Beal, Diana J., 1996. "Emerging Issues in Risk Management in Farm Firms," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(03), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Skees, Jerry R. & Black, J. Roy & Huirne, Ruud B.M. & Dijkhuizen, Aalt A., 2000. "An Analytical Framework For Discussing Farm Business Interruption Insurance For Classical Swine Fever," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21738, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Bardhan, D. & Tewari, S.K., 2007. "Risk Attitude and Risk Management Strategies: An Analysis of Dairy Farmers in Tarai Area of Uttaranchal State," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 1-16.
    3. Christian Schaper & Ludwig Theuvsen & Achim Spiller, 2010. "Risikoneigung und Risikoverhalten von Milch-erzeugern: Eine Typologisierung," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 3(1), pages 157-193.
    4. Hailu, Getu & Jeffrey, Scott R. & Goddard, Ellen W., 2004. "Impact Of Decision Makers Divergence In Risk Attitudes And Perceptions On Co-Operative Management In Canada," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20246, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beal, Diana J., 1996. "Emerging Issues in Risk Management in Farm Firms," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(03), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Manuela Larcher & Martin Schönhart & Erwin Schmid, 2016. "Risikobewertung und Risikomanagement landwirtschaftlicher BetriebsleiterInnen in Österreich – deskriptive Befragungsergebnisse 2015," Working Papers 592016, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    3. Meiring, J. A. & Oosthuizen, L. K., 1995. "Risiko-Bronne En Gepaardgaande Bestuursoptrede: Persepsies Van Besproeiingsboere Benede Die P.K. Le Rouxdam," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 34(01), March.
    4. Waweru, Caroline Waithira & Nyikal, Rose & Busienei, John R, "undated". "An Analysis Of Risk Attitudes And Risk Management Strategies Among Dairy Farmers In Murang’A County, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 271063, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    5. S. Martin & F. McLeay, 1998. "The Diversity of Farmers' Risk Management Strategies in a Deregulated New Zealand Environment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 218-233, June.
    6. MacNicol, R. & Ortmann, Gerald F. & Ferrer, Stuart R.D., 2008. "Management decisions on commercial sugarcane farms in KwaZulu-Natal: a focus on choice bracketing behaviour for risk management," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 47(01), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Waithira, Waweru Caroline, 2017. "An Analysis Of Risk Attitudes And Risk Management Strategies Among Dairy Farmers In Murang’A County, Kenya," Research Theses 276428, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    8. Véronique Le Bihan & Sophie Pardo & Patrice Guillotreau, 2013. "Risk Perception and Risk Management Strategies of Oyster Farmers," Post-Print hal-04295714, HAL.
    9. Martin, Sandra, 1996. "Risk Management Strategies in New Zealand Agriculture and Horticulture," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(01), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Martin, Sandra & Lee, Bill, 1991. "Risk in Farming," 8th Congress, New Zealand, 4-9 February 1991 346158, International Farm Management Association.
    11. MacNicol, R. & Ortmann, Gerald F. & Ferrer, Stuart R.D., 2007. "Perceptions of key business and financial risk by large-scale sugarcane farmers in KwaZulu-Natal in a dynamic socio-political environment," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(3), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Conradie, Beatrice & Piesse, Jenifer, 2016. "Ranking perceived risk to farmers: How important is the environment?," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Greiner, Romy & Miller, Owen & Patterson, Louisa, 2008. "The role of grazier motivations and risk attitudes in the adoption of grazing best management practices," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6002, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    14. Boyer, Christopher N. & Larson, James A. & Roberts, Roland K. & McClure, Angela T. & Tyler, Donald D., 2014. "The impact of field size and energy cost on the profitability of supplemental corn irrigation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 61-69.
    15. Ashok Mishra & Barry Goodwin, 2006. "Revenue insurance purchase decisions of farmers," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 149-159.
    16. Heidelbach, Olaf & Bokusheva, Raushan & Kussaiynov, Talgat, 2004. "Which type of crop insurance for Kazakhstan? -- Empirical Results," IAMO Discussion Papers 14876, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    17. Bishu, Kinfe & O'Reilly, Seamus & Lahiff, Edward & Steiner, Bodo, 2016. "Cattle farmers’ perceptions of risk and risk management strategies," MPRA Paper 74954, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. María Bielza & Alberto Garrido & José M. Sumpsi, 2004. "Revenue insurance as an income stabilization policy: an application to the Spanish olive oil sector," Post-Print hal-01201063, HAL.
    19. Anastassiadis Friederike & Feil Jan-Henning & Musshoff Oliver & Schilling Philipp, 2014. "Analysing Farmers’ Use of Price Hedging Instruments: An Experimental Approach," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 181-192, January.
    20. Greiner, Romy & Patterson, Louisa & Miller, Owen, 2009. "Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 99(2-3), pages 86-104, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea99:21507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.