IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v62y2009i06p03-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Die neue Kfz-Steuer: Mehr Klimaschutz oder Steuersenkungsprogramm?

Author

Listed:
  • Ferdinand Dudenhöffer
  • Ansgar Belke
  • Winfried Hermann
  • Jürgen Resch

Abstract

Am 1. Juli 2009 tritt die Neuregeklung der Kfz-Steuer in Kraft. Die Besteuerung der Neufahrzeuge wird sich dann zum Teil nach dem Kohlendioxidausstoß und zum Teil nach dem Hubraum der Fahrzeuge richten. Wie ist die Reform zu beurteilen? Nach Ansicht von Ferdinand Dudenhöffer, Center Automotive Research (CAR), Universität Duisburg-Essen, verfehlt die Neugestaltung der Steuer "sämtliche gesetzten Ziele". Die Steuer zementiere den vorgegebenen Standard, setze keine Anreize zur Weiterentwicklung der Spritspartechnik und sei zu unverständlich. Für Ansgar Belke, Universität Duisburg-Essen, stellt die Kfz-Steuerreform zwar einen Schritt in die richtige Richtung dar, da sie Anreize zur Anschaffung emissionsarmer Neufahrzeuge beinhalte. Allerdings schwäche die hubraumbezogene Komponente diese Wirkung ab. Besser für den Klimaschutz, aber politisch nicht durchsetzbar, wäre, seiner Meinung nach, die Umlegung der Kfz-Steuer auf die Energiesteuer gewesen. Auch habe das neue Kfz-Steuermodell keine ökonomische Lenkungswirkung, denn es sei immer noch viel zu kompliziert. Winfried Hermann, Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, sieht in der Steuerreform "viel Autoförderung und wenig Klimaschutz". Und für Jürgen Resch, Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V., ist eines der größten Probleme des Gesetzes der Verzicht auf steuerliche Anreize für besonders CO2-arme Fahrzeuge sowie "die im europäischen Vergleich Niedrigstbesteuerung von Klimakiller-Pkw". Dadurch verzichte Deutschland auf Impulse für die Entwicklung besonders effizienter Motoren.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferdinand Dudenhöffer & Ansgar Belke & Winfried Hermann & Jürgen Resch, 2009. "Die neue Kfz-Steuer: Mehr Klimaschutz oder Steuersenkungsprogramm?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 62(06), pages 03-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:62:y:2009:i:06:p:03-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2009_6_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sinn, Hans-Werner, . "Das grüne Paradoxon ; Plädoyer für eine illusionsfreie Klimapolitik," Monographs in Economics, University of Munich, Department of Economics, number 19627, November.
    2. Hartmut Kuhfeld & Uwe Kunert, 2005. "Reform der PKW-Besteuerung überfällig: die Initiative der EU-Kommission zeigt den richtigen Weg," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 72(49), pages 745-757.
    3. Janina Ketterer & Johann Wackerbauer, 2009. "Die Kraftfahrzeugsteuer als Instrument der Klimaschutzpolitik," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 62(04), pages 12-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalkuhl, Matthias & Edenhofer, Ottmar & Lessmann, Kai, 2013. "Renewable energy subsidies: Second-best policy or fatal aberration for mitigation?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 217-234.
    2. Michael Hoel, 2011. "The Supply Side of CO 2 with Country Heterogeneity," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 113(4), pages 846-865, December.
    3. Quentin Grafton, R. & Kompas, Tom & Van Long, Ngo, 2012. "Substitution between biofuels and fossil fuels: Is there a green paradox?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 328-341.
    4. van der Ploeg, Frederick & Withagen, Cees, 2012. "Too much coal, too little oil," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 62-77.
    5. Frederick Van der Ploeg & Cees A. Withagen, 2011. "Too Little Oil, Too Much Coal: Optimal Carbon Tax and when to Phase in Oil, Coal and Renewables," CESifo Working Paper Series 3526, CESifo.
    6. Buchholz Wolfgang & Heindl Peter, 2015. "Ökonomische Herausforderungen des Klimawandels," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 324-350, December.
    7. Frederick Van Der Ploeg & Cees Withagen, 2014. "Growth, Renewables, And The Optimal Carbon Tax," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 55(1), pages 283-311, February.
    8. Johann Wackerbauer & Jutta Albrecht-Saavedra & Marc Gronwald & Janina Ketterer & Jana Lippelt & Johannes Pfeiffer & Luise Röpke & Markus Zimmer, 2011. "Bewertung der klimapolitischen Maßnahmen und Instrumente: eine Studie im Auftrag der E.ON AG," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 51, September.
    9. Jutta Albrecht-Saavedra & Johannes Pfeiffer & Jana Lippelt, 2011. "Kurz zum Klima: Kohlenstoffsequestrierung – lässt sich dasKlimaproblem einfach »begraben«?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(06), pages 53-57, March.
    10. Marc Gronwald & Jana Lippelt, 2011. "Kurz zum Klima: Stromexporte, EEG und Emissionshandel," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(03), pages 34-36, February.
    11. Wolfgang Buchholz & Jonas Frank & Hans-Dieter Karl & Johannes Pfeiffer & Karen Pittel & Ursula Triebswetter & Jochen Habermann & Wolfgang Mauch & Thomas Staudacher, 2012. "Die Zukunft der Energiemärkte: Ökonomische Analyse und Bewertung von Potenzialen und Handlungsmöglichkeiten," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 57, September.
    12. Hoel, Michael, 2013. "Supply Side Climate Policy and the Green Paradox," Memorandum 03/2013, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    13. Frederick van der Ploeg & Cees Withagen, 2015. "Global Warming and the Green Paradox: A Review of Adverse Effects of Climate Policies," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 9(2), pages 285-303.
    14. Thomas Michielsen, 2013. "Brown Backstops Versus the Green Paradox," OxCarre Working Papers 108, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
    15. Frederick Van der Ploeg & Cees Withagen, 2011. "Optimal Carbon Tax with a Dirty Backstop - Oil, Coal, or Renewables?," CESifo Working Paper Series 3334, CESifo.
    16. Röpke, Luise, 2013. "The development of renewable energies and supply security: A trade-off analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1011-1021.
    17. R. Quentin Grafton & Tom Kompas & Ngo Van Long, 2010. "Do Biofuel Subsidies Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions?," International and Development Economics Working Papers idec10-01, International and Development Economics.
    18. van der Ploeg, Frederick & Withagen, Cees, 2012. "Is there really a green paradox?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 342-363.
    19. Maren Birkenstock & Nobert Röder & Silke Thiele & Michael Schmitz, 2019. "Eine moderne, umweltfreundliche und ethische Agrarpolitik – Ziele und Instrumente [The Reform of the Common European Agricultural Policy - An Opportunity for Effective Agri-environmental Policy Ins," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(10), pages 675-686, October.
    20. Gersbach, Hans & Hummel, Noemi, 2011. "Climate Policy and Developing Countries," CEPR Discussion Papers 8685, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Kraftfahrzeugsteuer; Klimaschutz; Kohlendioxid; Steuersenkung; Deutschland;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:62:y:2009:i:06:p:03-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.