IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v61y2008i14p14-28.html

Struktur und Entwicklungspotential der Photovoltaikindustrie in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Volker Ruhl
  • Johann Wackerbauer

Abstract

In den letzten Jahren hat die Photovoltaikindustrie in Deutschland, vorangetrieben von der klimapolitischen Zielsetzung der Bundesregierung und begünstigt durch die hohen Einspeisevergütungen für Solarstrom nach dem Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz, ein rasantes Wachstum erlebt. Viele Staaten setzen auf den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien, und die meisten EU-Mitgliedsländer fördern sie durch Einspeisevergütungen ähnlich dem deutschen Modell, woraus sich erhebliche Exportpotentiale für die deutsche Solarindustrie ergeben. Aus Sicht der Photovoltaikunternehmen wird sich die Entwicklung auch in den kommenden Jahren fortsetzen. Die im Vergleich zum Westen strukturschwachen Regionen in Ostdeutschland konnten sich als Standorte vor allem der Hersteller etablieren.

Suggested Citation

  • Volker Ruhl & Johann Wackerbauer, 2008. "Struktur und Entwicklungspotential der Photovoltaikindustrie in Deutschland," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 61(14), pages 14-28, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:61:y:2008:i:14:p:14-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2008_14_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Frondel/ Nolan Ritter/ Christoph M. Schmidt, 2008. "Photovoltaik: Wo viel Licht ist, ist auch viel Schatten," List Forum Chapter, in: List Gesellschaft e.V. (ed.), List Forum Band 34, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 3, pages 28 - 44, List Gesellschaft e.V..
    2. Philippe Aghion & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt & Susanne Prantl, 2009. "The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91(1), pages 20-32, February.
    3. Ursula Triebswetter & Johann Wackerbauer, 2010. "Die Umweltwirtschaft in Bayern," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(23), pages 33-41, December.
    4. Manuel Frondel & Nolan Ritter & Christoph M. Schmidt, 2007. "Photovoltaik: Wo viel Licht ist, ist auch viel Schatten," RWI Positionen, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, pages 12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johann Wackerbauer & Jana Lippelt, 2012. "Kurz zum Klima: Solarstromboom mit Nebenwirkungen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(03), pages 31-34, February.
    2. Joachim Ragnitz & Heinz Schmalholz & Ursula Triebswetter & Johann Wackerbauer, 2009. "Cleantech in Ostdeutschland: Bestandsaufnahme und Entwicklungsperspektiven," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 16(03), pages 3-10, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johann Wackerbauer & Jutta Albrecht-Saavedra & Marc Gronwald & Janina Ketterer & Jana Lippelt & Johannes Pfeiffer & Luise Röpke & Markus Zimmer, 2011. "Bewertung der klimapolitischen Maßnahmen und Instrumente: eine Studie im Auftrag der E.ON AG," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 51.
    2. Marc Gronwald & Jana Lippelt, 2011. "Kurz zum Klima: Stromexporte, EEG und Emissionshandel," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(03), pages 34-36, February.
    3. Johann Wackerbauer & Jana Lippelt, 2012. "Kurz zum Klima: Solarstromboom mit Nebenwirkungen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(03), pages 31-34, February.
    4. Gersbach, Hans & Schneider, Maik & Schneller, Olivier, 2010. "Optimal Mix of Applied and Basic Research, Distance to Frontier, and Openness," CEPR Discussion Papers 7795, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Massimo Colombo & Annalisa Croce & Samuele Murtinu, 2014. "Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 265-282, February.
    6. Fabiano Schivardi & Eliana Viviano, 2007. "Entry barriers in Italian retail trade," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 616, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. Da Rin, Marco & Di Giacomo, Marina & Sembenelli, Alessandro, 2011. "Entrepreneurship, firm entry, and the taxation of corporate income: Evidence from Europe," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 1048-1066.
    8. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    9. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2009-034 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Cincera, Michele & Ince, Ela & Santos, Anabela, 2024. "Revisiting the innovation-competition nexus: Evidence from worldwide manufacturing and service industries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 586-603.
    11. Jean-Pierre Ponssard, 2008. "Short term entry barriers may be good for long term competition," Working Papers hal-00347663, HAL.
    12. Giammario Impullitti, 2007. "International Schumpeterian Competition and Optimal R&D subsidies," Economics Working Papers ECO2007/55, European University Institute.
    13. Xue, Biao & Lin, Yan & Ren, Fangxiao & Li, Runfo, 2024. "Business environment ecosystem and manufacturing upgrading: A configurational approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1225-1237.
    14. William Maloney & Pablo Garriga & Marcela Meléndez & Raúl Morales & Charl Jooste & James Sampi & Jorge Thompson Araujo & Ekaterina Vostroknutova, "undated". "Latin America and the Caribbean Economic Review, April 2024 - Competition: The Missing Ingredient for Growth? [Informe Económico América Latina y el Caribe, Abril 2024: Competencia: ¿el ingrediente," World Bank Publications - Reports 41230, The World Bank Group.
    15. Magnus Henrekson & Mikael Stenkula, 2017. "The entrepreneurial rent: the value of and compensation for entrepreneurship," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 11-25, April.
    16. Dinuk Jayasuriya, 2011. "Improvements in the World Bank's Ease of Doing Business Rankings: Do they translate into greater foreign direct investment inflows?," Development Policy Centre Discussion Papers 1108, Development Policy Centre, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    17. Sameeksha Desai & Johan E. Eklund & Emma Lappi, 2020. "Entry Regulation and Persistence of Profits in Incumbent Firms," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 57(3), pages 537-558, November.
    18. Nathan, Max, 2022. "Does light touch cluster policy work? Evaluating the tech city programme," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    19. Zhu, Chen & Xia, Yuqing & Liu, Qing & Hou, Bojun, 2023. "Deregulation and green innovation: Does cultural reform pilot project matter," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 84-105.
    20. Hélène Latzer & Kiminori Matsuyama & Mathieu Parenti, 2018. "The market Size Effect in Endogenous Growth Reconsidered," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 18032, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    21. Eugenia Bessonova, 2010. "Efficiency of Manufacturing in Russia: Effect of Domestic Competition and FDI," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 17(1), pages 106-127.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:61:y:2008:i:14:p:14-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.