IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cdh/commen/505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal Soundness and Economic Growth: An Economic Program for Ontario

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Dachis

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

Abstract

Ontario is on an unsustainable fiscal course. The government must act to bring the long-term cost of government in line with the revenue-raising capacity of the province. This Economic Program shows a number of policy directions in areas as diverse as healthcare, labour and education policy, tax reform, housing and municipal policy, as well as electricity and greenhouse gas policy, that can balance increases in spending with the generation of new revenues and cost-savings measures. This Economic Program adopts the fiscal presentations of the independent officers of the Ontario legislature – the Auditor General and Financial Accountability Office – as the authoritative sources for the short-, medium- and long-term fiscal outlook. The medium- and long-term fiscal outlook for Ontario is dire. This Economic Program recommends that the government restate the province’s books to reflect the Auditor General’s accounting treatment of pension assets and electricity-sector debt. Further, the government should adopt a sound long-term fiscal policy – which requires surpluses, not just balanced budgets – that meets the government’s debt-to-GDP target ratio of 27 percent. In healthcare, which already consumes roughly half of the province’s own-source revenues, policymakers will face continued cost pressure. This Economic Program views progress in addressing this issue – in addition to limiting public and private gaps in coverage for prescription drugs and mental health – as a critical challenge. This Economic Program also focuses on reforms to labour and employment legislation to increase the flexibility of existing minimum wage policies and employment and labour laws. It also focuses on improving the skills of Ontarians seeking mid-career improvements, and improving the performance of Ontario’s K-12 and post-secondary education systems. With recent United States tax reform considerably raising the attractiveness of the United States for new business investment, this Economic Program takes steps to improve the competitiveness of the province as a destination for firms to make investments and for workers to live. With regard to housing and municipal policy, this Economic Program seeks to lower the cost of housing across the province by taking steps to reduce barriers to construction and eliminating economically costly rent controls and transfer taxes. It would also fundamentally change the relationship between municipalities and the province by granting cities the ability to put their budgets on a sound financial footing and allow them more flexibility in financing infrastructure. Finally, no policy area has been more controversial than Ontario’s greenhouse gas and electricity policies. This Economic Program would preserve the best parts of the current government’s plan, while cutting ineffective policies and reducing costs to households. This Economic Program would seek long-term cost savings in the electricity sector, as opposed to short-term fixes that only add to the long-term cost of energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Dachis, 2018. "Fiscal Soundness and Economic Growth: An Economic Program for Ontario," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 505, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_505%20%282%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Busby & Jonathan Pedde, 2014. "Should Public Drug Plans be Based on Age or Income?," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 417, November.
    2. Michael Wyman, 2014. "Rethinking Ontario’s Electricity System with Consumers in Mind," e-briefs 182, C.D. Howe Institute.
    3. David Popp, 2016. "A Blueprint for Going Green: The Best Policy Mix for Promoting Low-Emissions Technology," e-briefs 242, C.D. Howe Institute.
    4. repec:cdh:commen:496 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:cdh:commen:478 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:cdh:commen:491 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Anindya Sen, 2015. "Peak Power Problems: How Ontario’s Industrial Electricity Pricing System Impacts Consumers," e-briefs 209, C.D. Howe Institute.
    8. Colin Busby & William B.P. Robson, 2011. "A Social Insurance Model for Pharmacare: Ontario's Options for a More Sustainable, Cost-Effective Drug Program," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 326, April.
    9. repec:cdh:commen:503 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Nicholas Rivers and Leslie Shiell, 2016. "Free-Riding on Energy Efficiency Subsidies: the Case of Natural Gas Furnaces in Canada," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    11. Benjamin Dachis, 2012. "Stuck in Place: The Effect of Land Transfer Taxes on Housing Transactions," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 364, October.
    12. Joseph Marchand, 2017. "Thinking about Minimum Wage Increases in Alberta: Theoretically, Empirically, and Regionally," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 491, pages 1-20, September.
    13. Steven Robins, 2017. "Surge Capacity: Selling City-owned Electricity Distributors to Meet Broader Municipal Infrastructure Needs," e-briefs 257, C.D. Howe Institute.
    14. Anna Stokke, 2015. "What to Do About Canada's Declining Math Scores?," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 427, May.
    15. Adam Found, 2012. "Economies of Scale in Fire and Police Services in Ontario," IMFG Papers 12, University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.
    16. repec:cdh:commen:470 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ake Blomqvist & Colin Busby, 2012. "How to Pay Family Doctors: Why "Pay per Patient" is Better Than Fee for Service," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 365, October.
    18. repec:eee:pubeco:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:20-35 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Christine Neill, 2013. "What You Don't Know Can't Help You: Lessons of Behavioural Economics for Tax-Based Student Aid," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 393, November.
    20. John Richards & Parisa Mahboubi, 2018. "Measuring Student Outcomes: The Case for Identifying Indigenous Students in Canada’s PISA Sample," e-briefs 272, C.D. Howe Institute.
    21. repec:cdh:commen:488 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Mark Parsons, 2011. "Rewarding Innovation: Improving Federal Tax Support for Business R&D in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 334, September.
    23. Congressional Budget Office, 2017. "The 2017 Long-Term Budget Outlook," Reports 52480, Congressional Budget Office.
    24. Nick Pantaleo & Finn Poschmann & Scott Wilkie, 2013. "Improving the Tax Treatment of Intellectual Property Income in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 379, April.
    25. Adam Found & Peter Tomlinson, 2017. "Business Tax Burdens in Canada’s Major Cities: The 2017 Report Card," e-briefs 269, C.D. Howe Institute.
    26. Griffith, Rachel & O’Connell, Martin & Smith, Kate, 2019. "Tax design in the alcohol market," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 20-35.
    27. repec:cdh:commen:458 is not listed on IDEAS
    28. Benjamin Dachis & Gilles Duranton & Matthew A. Turner, 2008. "Sand in the Gears: Evaluating the Effects of Toronto's Land Transfer Tax," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 277, December.
    29. Michael Trebilcock, 2017. "Ontario’s Green Energy Experience: Sobering Lessons for Sustainable Climate Change Policies," e-briefs 263, C.D. Howe Institute.
    30. Alexandre Laurin, 2015. "Shifting the Federal Tax Burden on the One-Percenters: A Losing Proposition," e-briefs 222, C.D. Howe Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fiscal and Tax Policy; Provincial Taxation and Budgets;

    JEL classification:

    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H68 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Forecasts of Budgets, Deficits, and Debt

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kristine Gray). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.