IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/glecon/v10y2011i4n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-Imagining the U.S.-Mexico Border: Policies toward a More Competitive and Sustainable Transborder Region

Author

Listed:
  • Gerber James

    (San Diego State University)

  • Lara-Valencia Francisco

    (Arizona State University)

  • de la Parra Carlos

    (El Colegio de la Frontera Norte)

Abstract

The U.S.-Mexico border region has two important but often overlooked characteristics. First, it is the physical place of most of the integration between the United States and Mexico, including market driven integration such as trade flows, migration, and investment as well as policy driven integration such as security cooperation, infrastructure development, and emergency response. Second, the border region has a growing transnational population that lives, works, goes to school, and participates in family and social networks on both sides of the border. Recent U.S. policy has hardened the border in response to concerns about terrorism, drug and human trafficking, undocumented migration, and arms smuggling. The consequences of these policies include disruption of the on-going economic integration, large external costs imposed on the growing transnational population, and barriers to progress on a number of issues of national importance, including dispute resolution, migration, and environmental management, among others. The paper identifies and discusses the advantages of the three different definitions of the border in current usage: counties and municipios that touch the border; the 100 kilometer boundary first set by the La Paz Agreement and later amended to 300 kilometers in Mexico and 100 in the U.S.; and the ten states that are along the border. The hardening of the border is partly the result of a lack of border institutions and the inability of border residents to speak in a common voice when they talk to their capitals. This is changing, however, as new institutions such as the Border Governors Conference take on a more active role in promoting the interests of border states and border regions. An examination of a recent Delphi survey of border decision-makers shows a high degree of cross border agreement on the goals and needs of the region in key areas such as competitiveness, security, and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerber James & Lara-Valencia Francisco & de la Parra Carlos, 2011. "Re-Imagining the U.S.-Mexico Border: Policies toward a More Competitive and Sustainable Transborder Region," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:glecon:v:10:y:2011:i:4:n:5
    DOI: 10.2202/1524-5861.1681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1524-5861.1681
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1524-5861.1681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Jeffrey J. Schott, 1993. "NAFTA: An Assessment, Revised Edition," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 70, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Festus Ebo Turkson, 2012. "Trade Agreements and Bilateral Trade in Sub-Saharan Africa: Estimating the Trade Effects of the EU-ACP PTA and RTAs," Discussion Papers 12/07, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    2. Ibarra-Yunez, Alejandro, 2003. "Spaghetti regionalism or strategic foreign trade: some evidence for Mexico," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 567-584, December.
    3. Fernandez-Arias, Eduardo & Spiegel, Mark M., 1998. "North-South customs unions and international capital mobility," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 229-251, December.
    4. Falusné Szikra, Katalin, 1999. "Globalizáció és munkapiac, különös tekintettel a magasan fejlett országokra [Globalization and the labour market (With particular attention to the highly developed countries)]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 20-34.
    5. David J. Hayward & Rodney A. Erickson, 1995. "The North American Trade of U.S. States: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial Shipments, 1983-91," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 18(1), pages 1-31, January.
    6. Wylie, Peter J., 1995. "Partial equilibrium estimates of manufacturing trade creation and diversion due to NAFTA," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 65-84.
    7. Jesús Cañas & Roberto Coronado & Robert W. Gilmer & Eduardo Saucedo, 2013. "The Impact of the Maquiladora Industry on U.S. Border Cities," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 415-442, September.
    8. Schweikhardt, David B. & Yumkella, Kandeh K., 1995. "Economic Integration in North America: Consequences, Opportunities, and Challenges for the Michigan Food System," Staff Paper Series 201208, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    9. Walt Vanderbush, 1998. "An Uphill Struggle to Resist Downward Harmonization in Puebla, Mexico: The Case of Volkswagen Workers," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 12(3), pages 248-265, August.
    10. Wei, Honghong & Lahiri, Radhika, 2019. "The impact of commodity price shocks in the presence of a trading relationship: A GVAR analysis of the NAFTA," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 553-569.
    11. Blomstrom, Magnus & Kokko, Ari, 1997. "Regional integration and foreign direct investment : a conceptual framework and three cases," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1750, The World Bank.
    12. L M Benton, 1996. "The Greening of Free Trade? The Debate about the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Environment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(12), pages 2155-2177, December.
    13. Fernando Martin-Mayoral & Gabriela Morán Carofilis & John Cajas Guijarro, 2016. "The effects of integration agreements in Western Hemisphere trade, 1970--2014," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 724-756, August.
    14. Aggarwal, Raj & Long, Michael & Moore, Scott & Ervin, Danny, 1998. "Industry differences in NAFTA's impact on the valuation of U.S. companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 137-152.
    15. Averyt, William F. & Ramagopal, K., 1999. "Strategic disruption and transaction cost economics: The case of the American auto industry and Japanese competition," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 39-53, January.
    16. Blomström, Magnus & Kokko, Ari, 1997. "Regional Integration and Foreign Direct Investment," CEPR Discussion Papers 1659, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Cathleen Cimino & Tyler Moran, 2014. "NAFTA at 20: Misleading Charges and Positive Achievements," Policy Briefs PB14-13, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    18. Klein, Lawrence R. & Salvatore, Dominick, 1995. "Welfare effects of the North American free trade agreement," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 163-176, April.
    19. Haggard, Stephan & Maxfield, Sylvia, 1996. "The political economy of financial internationalization in the developing world," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 35-68, January.
    20. David Orden, 1996. "Agricultural Interest Group Bargaining over the North American Free Trade Agreement," NBER Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Trade Protection, pages 71-84, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:glecon:v:10:y:2011:i:4:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.