Concentration and Innovation in the U.S. Food Industries
We investigate the effect of industrial concentration on productivity growth, a proxy for innovation, in the U.S. food industries. Here, we search for a possible critical level of concentration, i.e., the inverted-U hypothesis beyond which its relationship with productivity can turn negative. Productivity growth is specified as function of growth in concentration and vice versa with conditioning variables. The resulting simultaneous panel model is estimated using a panel (grouped) database comprising of 36 food-processing industries and the 1964-1992 period. Results suggest the conditioned productivity-industrial concentration relationship has an inverted-U shape. The critical level of concentration, where the relationship between growth rates of productivity and concentration turns negative, appears to be 62.3, a 24% increase from the current levels. A mapping of the net effects of an increase in concentration suggests that current deadweight loss of $7.8 billion can be reduced to about $2.8 billion when concentration increases by 18% from its current level. A reassessment of the income distributional effects of concentration suggests that consumers gain from lower food prices and agricultural producers face an increase in demand, albeit in a second-best world.
Volume (Year): 1 (2003)
Issue (Month): 1 (August)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://www.degruyter.com|
|Order Information:||Web: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jafio|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- anonymous, 1995. "Does the bouncing ball lead to economic growth?," Regional Update, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, issue Jul, pages 1-2,4-6.
- Robert J. Barro, 2013.
"Inflation and Economic Growth,"
Annals of Economics and Finance,
Society for AEF, vol. 14(1), pages 121-144, May.
- Robert J. Barro, 1995. "Inflation and Economic Growth," NBER Working Papers 5326, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Robert J. Barro, 2012. "Inflation and Economic Growth," CEMA Working Papers 568, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
- Nguyen, The-Hiep & Bernier, Gilles, 1988. "Beta and q in a Simultaneous Framework with Pooled Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 70(3), pages 520-524, August.
- Bronwyn H. Hall & Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 2001. "The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools," NBER Working Papers 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hall, B. & Jaffe, A. & Trajtenberg, M., 2001. "The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools," Papers 2001-29, Tel Aviv.
- Hall, Bronwyn H & Jaffe, Adam B & Trajtenberg, Manuel, 2001. "The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools," CEPR Discussion Papers 3094, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Smulders, Sjak & van de Klundert, Theo, 1995. "Imperfect competition, concentration and growth with firm-specific R & D," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 139-160, January.
- Smulders, J.A. & van de Klundert, T.C.M.J., 1995. "Imperfect competition, concentration and growth with firm-specific R&D," Other publications TiSEM 3287368d-bf5d-421a-91c1-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Geroski, P. A., 1982. "Simultaneous equations models of the structure-performance paradigm," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 145-158.
- Kinal, T & Lahiri, K, 1993. "On the Estimation of Simultaneous-Equations Error-Components Models with an Application to a Model of Developing Country Foreign Trade," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 81-92, Jan.-Marc.
- Xavier Sala-I-Martin, 1997. "Transfers, Social Safety Nets, and Economic Growth," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 44(1), pages 81-102, March.