IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v10y1989i5p487-505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic comparative analysis and synthesis of two business‐level strategic typologies

Author

Listed:
  • Eli Segev

Abstract

Two important business‐level strategic typologies were systematically evaluated, analyzed and compared in this study: Porter'S Overall Cost Leadership, Differentiation, Focus, and ‘Stuck in the Middle’ generic competitive strategies, and Miles and Snow'S Defender, Prospector, Analyzer, and Reactor types of organizational adaptation. On the basis of strategic theory, and following a pilot study, 31 strategic variables were evaluated by judges on a seven‐point maximum‐minimum scale, for each strategy, within its typology. Analysis of variances and concordance among judges regarding the ranking of the strategies on each variable were examined, and a strategic profile was built for each strategy. Proximities between strategies of the two typologies were analyzed using monotonic multidimensional scaling. The analysis indicated similarities and differences between the two typologies. A synthesis of the two typologies is suggested along two dimensions: internal consistency of the strategy, and level of proactiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Eli Segev, 1989. "A systematic comparative analysis and synthesis of two business‐level strategic typologies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), pages 487-505, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:10:y:1989:i:5:p:487-505
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250100507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100507
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.4250100507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Élisabeth Lefebvre & Louis A. Lefebvre & Lise Préfontaine, 1994. "Relating HRM and MOT Capabilities to R&D Intensity," CIRANO Working Papers 94s-06, CIRANO.
    2. Rajiv Sabherwal & Rudy Hirschheim & Tim Goles, 2001. "The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 179-197, April.
    3. Ellen Haustein & Robert Luther & Peter Schuster, 2014. "Management control systems in innovation companies: a literature based framework," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 343-382, February.
    4. Deepak K. Datta & Xin Liang & Martina Musteen, 2009. "Strategic Orientation and the Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 269-290, June.
    5. Heijltjes, M.G. & van Witteloostuijn, A., 1996. "Configurations of market environments, competitive strategies, manufacturing technologies and human resource management policies : a two-industry and two-country analysis of fit," Research Memorandum 005, Maastricht University, Netherlands Institute of Business Organization and Strategy Research (NIBOR).
    6. Maurice Gosselin, 2000. "Influence de la stratégie sur l'adoption et la mise en oeuvre d'une comptabilité par activités," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 3(4), pages 37-56, December.
    7. Rhys Andrews & George A. Boyne & Jennifer Law & Richard M. Walker, 2012. "Strategic Management and Public Service Performance," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-34943-8.
    8. Brock, David M. & Barry, David, 2003. "What if planning were really strategic? Exploring the strategy-planning relationship in multinationals," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 543-561, October.
    9. Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Reza M. Monem & Tony van Zijl, 2023. "Business strategy, cash holdings, and dividend payouts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 3999-4035, December.
    10. Naranjo-Gil, David & Hartmann, Frank, 2007. "Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 735-756.
    11. Schoute, Martijn, 2009. "The relationship between cost system complexity, purposes of use, and cost system effectiveness," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 208-226.
    12. Mohamad Reza Sanaei & Farzad Movahedi Sobhani, 2018. "Information technology and e-business marketing strategy," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 185-196, September.
    13. Zahra, Shaker A., 1996. "Technology strategy and financial performance: Examining the moderating role of the firm's competitive environment," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 189-219, May.
    14. Avci, Umut & Madanoglu, Melih & Okumus, Fevzi, 2011. "Strategic orientation and performance of tourism firms: Evidence from a developing country," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 147-157.
    15. R. Lamadrid & A. Heene & X. Gellynck, 2008. "Rewiring Business Firms through an Entrepreneurial-Oriented Strategy Making," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/499, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    16. Siddharth Gaurav Majhi & Ambuj Anand & Arindam Mukherjee & Nripendra P. Rana, 2022. "The Optimal Configuration of IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities in a firm’s Capabilities Portfolio: a Strategic Alignment Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1435-1450, October.
    17. Odd Jarl Borch & Morten Huse & Knut Senneseth, 1999. "Resource Configuration, Competitive Strategies, and Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Examination of Small Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(1), pages 49-70, October.
    18. Verhallen, T.M.M. & Frambach, R.T. & Prabhu, J.C., 1998. "Strategy based segmentation of industrial markets," Other publications TiSEM 0ab50030-7566-4501-904b-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Michel Arcand & Guy Arcand & Mohamed Bayad & Bruno Fabi, 2004. "Systèmes De Gestion Des Ressources Humaines Et Performance Organisationnelle," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 497-524, September.
    20. Woodside, Arch G. & Sullivan, Daniel P. & TrappeyIII, Randolph J., 1999. "Assessing Relationships among Strategic Types, Distinctive Marketing Competencies, and Organizational Performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 135-146, June.
    21. Van der Stede, Wim A., 2000. "The relationship between two consequences of budgetary controls: budgetary slack creation and managerial short-term orientation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 609-622, August.
    22. Ahmad Husairi, Mariyani & Morgan, Robert E. & De Luca, Luigi M., 2021. "Market entry timing: The impact of complementary capabilities on strategic outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 45-55.
    23. Aragon-Correa, Juan Alberto & Matias-Reche, Fernando & Senise-Barrio, Maria Eugenia, 2004. "Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(9), pages 964-975, September.
    24. Rajiv Sabherwal & Yolande E. Chan, 2001. "Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 11-33, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:10:y:1989:i:5:p:487-505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.