IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v77y2023i4p444-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robust mixed‐effects parametric quantile regression model for continuous proportions: Quantifying the constraints to vitality in cushion plants

Author

Listed:
  • Divan A. Burger
  • Sean van der Merwe
  • Emmanuel Lesaffre
  • Peter C. le Roux
  • Morgan J. Raath‐Krüger

Abstract

There is no literature on outlier‐robust parametric mixed‐effects quantile regression models for continuous proportion data as an alternative to systematically identifying and eliminating outliers. To fill this gap, we formulate a robust method by extending the recently proposed fixed‐effects quantile regression model based on the heavy‐tailed Johnson‐t$$ t $$ distribution for continuous proportion data to the mixed‐effects modeling context, using a Bayesian approach. Our proposed method is motivated by and used to model the extreme quantiles of the vitality of cushion plants to provide insights into the ecology of the system in which the plants are dominant. We conducted a simulation study to assess the new method's performance and robustness to outliers. We show that the new model has good accuracy and confidence interval coverage properties and is remarkably robust to outliers. In contrast, our study demonstrates that the current approach in the literature for modeling hierarchically structured bounded data's quantiles is susceptible to outliers, especially when modeling the extreme quantiles. We conclude that the proposed model is an appropriate robust alternative to the current approach for modeling the quantiles of correlated continuous proportions when outliers are present in the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Divan A. Burger & Sean van der Merwe & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Peter C. le Roux & Morgan J. Raath‐Krüger, 2023. "A robust mixed‐effects parametric quantile regression model for continuous proportions: Quantifying the constraints to vitality in cushion plants," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(4), pages 444-470, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:77:y:2023:i:4:p:444-470
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carpenter, Bob & Gelman, Andrew & Hoffman, Matthew D. & Lee, Daniel & Goodrich, Ben & Betancourt, Michael & Brubaker, Marcus & Guo, Jiqiang & Li, Peter & Riddell, Allen, 2017. "Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i01).
    2. Goddard, K.A. & Craig, K.J. & Schoombie, J. & le Roux, P.C., 2022. "Investigation of ecologically relevant wind patterns on Marion Island using Computational Fluid Dynamics and measured data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    3. Denwood, Matthew J., 2016. "runjags: An R Package Providing Interface Utilities, Model Templates, Parallel Computing Methods and Additional Distributions for MCMC Models in JAGS," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 71(i09).
    4. Lindgren, Finn & Rue, Håvard, 2015. "Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R-INLA," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i19).
    5. Silvia Ferrari & Francisco Cribari-Neto, 2004. "Beta Regression for Modelling Rates and Proportions," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 799-815.
    6. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    7. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    8. Insik Min & Inchul Kim, 2004. "A Monte Carlo comparison of parametric and nonparametric quantile regressions," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 71-74.
    9. Thaís C. O. Fonseca & Marco A. R. Ferreira & Helio S. Migon, 2008. "Objective Bayesian analysis for the Student-t regression model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(2), pages 325-333.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rubio, F.J. & Steel, M.F.J., 2011. "Inference for grouped data with a truncated skew-Laplace distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3218-3231, December.
    2. Yayan Hernuryadin & Koji Kotani & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2020. "Time Preferences of Food Producers: Does “Cultivate and Grow” Matter?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(1), pages 132-148.
    3. Dries P.J. Kuijper & Jakub W. Bubnicki & Marcin Churski & Bjorn Mols & Pim van Hooft, 2015. "Context dependence of risk effects: wolves and tree logs create patches of fear in an old-growth forest," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1558-1568.
    4. David M. Phillippo & Sofia Dias & A. E. Ades & Mark Belger & Alan Brnabic & Alexander Schacht & Daniel Saure & Zbigniew Kadziola & Nicky J. Welton, 2020. "Multilevel network meta‐regression for population‐adjusted treatment comparisons," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1189-1210, June.
    5. Maria Gheorghe & Susan Picavet & Monique Verschuren & Werner B. F. Brouwer & Pieter H. M. Baal, 2017. "Health losses at the end of life: a Bayesian mixed beta regression approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(3), pages 723-749, June.
    6. Zhang, Shen & Liu, Xin & Tang, Jinjun & Cheng, Shaowu & Qi, Yong & Wang, Yinhai, 2018. "Spatio-temporal modeling of destination choice behavior through the Bayesian hierarchical approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 537-551.
    7. Christian E. Galarza & Panpan Zhang & Víctor H. Lachos, 2021. "Logistic Quantile Regression for Bounded Outcomes Using a Family of Heavy-Tailed Distributions," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 325-349, November.
    8. Corrado Andini, 2010. "Within-groups wage inequality and schooling: further evidence for Portugal," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(28), pages 3685-3691.
    9. Marco Gramatica & Peter Congdon & Silvia Liverani, 2021. "Bayesian modelling for spatially misaligned health areal data: A multiple membership approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 645-666, June.
    10. Ferreira, Marco A.R. & Porter, Erica M. & Franck, Christopher T., 2021. "Fast and scalable computations for Gaussian hierarchical models with intrinsic conditional autoregressive spatial random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Kathryn M. Irvine & T. J. Rodhouse & Ilai N. Keren, 2016. "Extending Ordinal Regression with a Latent Zero-Augmented Beta Distribution," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 619-640, December.
    12. Viola Merhof & Thorsten Meiser, 2023. "Dynamic Response Strategies: Accounting for Response Process Heterogeneity in IRTree Decision Nodes," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1354-1380, December.
    13. Álvaro Briz-Redón, 2021. "Respondent Burden Effects on Item Non-Response and Careless Response Rates: An Analysis of Two Types of Surveys," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Cathy Chen & Simon Lin & Philip Yu, 2012. "Smooth Transition Quantile Capital Asset Pricing Models with Heteroscedasticity," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 40(1), pages 19-48, June.
    15. Manuel Landajo & Javier De Andrés & Pedro Lorca, 2008. "Measuring firm performance by using linear and non‐parametric quantile regressions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(2), pages 227-250, April.
    16. Carlos Díaz-Avalos & Pablo Juan & Somnath Chaudhuri & Marc Sáez & Laura Serra, 2020. "Association between the New COVID-19 Cases and Air Pollution with Meteorological Elements in Nine Counties of New York State," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Deslatte, Aaron & Scott, Tyler A. & Carter, David P., 2019. "Specialized governance and regional land-use outcomes: A spatial analysis of Florida community development districts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 227-239.
    18. Müller, Alfred & Reuber, Matthias, 2023. "A copula-based time series model for global horizontal irradiation," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 869-883.
    19. Liu, Qingyang & Huang, Xianzheng & Bai, Ray, 2024. "Bayesian modal regression based on mixture distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Chiranjit Dutta & Nalini Ravishanker & Sumanta Basu, 2022. "Modeling Multivariate Positive-Valued Time Series Using R-INLA," Papers 2206.05374, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:77:y:2023:i:4:p:444-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.