IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v72y2018i4p421-446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entropy‐based benchmarking methods

Author

Listed:
  • Umed Temursho

Abstract

This paper argues that benchmarking of sign‐volatile time series has to be based on the principle of movement and sign preservation, which requires the benchmarked series to reproduce both the short‐term movements and signs of the original series. It is shown that the widely used variants of Denton method and the Causey‐Trager growth rate preservation method may violate this principle. Four variants of entropy‐based benchmarking methods are proposed that, by construction, account for the requirements of the movement and sign preservation principle. Our extensive simulations confirm that the proposed entropy methods can be regarded as plausible competitors for the well‐established benchmarking methods and may even be preferred in cases of benchmarking series that are highly volatile in sign and/or movements.

Suggested Citation

  • Umed Temursho, 2018. "Entropy‐based benchmarking methods," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(4), pages 421-446, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:72:y:2018:i:4:p:421-446
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12160
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Lahr & Louis de Mesnard, 2004. "Biproportional Techniques in Input-Output Analysis: Table Updating and Structural Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 115-134.
    2. Tommaso Di Fonzo & Marco Marini, 2011. "Simultaneous and two‐step reconciliation of systems of time series: methodological and practical issues," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(2), pages 143-164, March.
    3. Theo Junius & Jan Oosterhaven, 2003. "The Solution of Updating or Regionalizing a Matrix with both Positive and Negative Entries," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 87-96, March.
    4. Golan, Amos & Judge, George G. & Miller, Douglas, 1996. "Maximum Entropy Econometrics," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1488, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Umed Temurshoev & Colin Webb & Norihiko Yamano, 2011. "Projection Of Supply And Use Tables: Methods And Their Empirical Assessment," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 91-123.
    6. Reinier Bikker & Jacco Daalmans & Nino Mushkudiani, 2013. "Benchmarking Large Accounting Frameworks: A Generalized Multivariate Model," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 390-408, December.
    7. Manfred Lenzen & Richard Wood & Blanca Gallego, 2007. "Some Comments on the GRAS Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 461-465.
    8. Umed Temurshoev & Ronald E. Miller & Maaike C. Bouwmeester, 2013. "A Note On The Gras Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 361-367, September.
    9. Baoline Chen, 2007. "An Empirical Comparison of Methods for Temporal Distribution and Interpolation at the National Accounts," BEA Papers 0077, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    10. Chow, Gregory C & Lin, An-loh, 1971. "Best Linear Unbiased Interpolation, Distribution, and Extrapolation of Time Series by Related Series," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 53(4), pages 372-375, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerardo Ferrara & Sam Langfield & Zijun Liu & Tomohiro Ota, 2019. "Systemic illiquidity in the interbank network," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(11), pages 1779-1795, November.
    2. Ricci L. Reber & Sarah J. Pack, 2014. "Methods of Temporal Disaggregation for Estimating Output of the Insurance Industry," BEA Working Papers 0115, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Umed Temursho & Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Krzysztof Wojtowicz & Luis Rey & Matthias Weitzel & Toon Vandyck & Bert Saveyn, 2020. "Projecting input-output tables for model baselines," JRC Research Reports JRC120513, Joint Research Centre.
    2. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-122 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Tamas Revesz, 2023. "A not sign-preserving iteration algorithm for the ‘Improved Normalized Squared Differences’ matrix adjustment model," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(1), pages 49-71, March.
    4. Casiano A. Manrique-de-Lara-Peñate & Dolores R. Santos-Peñate, 2017. "SAM updating using multi-objective optimization techniques," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(3), pages 647-667, August.
    5. Juan Manuel Valderas‐Jaramillo & José Manuel Rueda‐Cantuche, 2021. "The multidimensional nD‐GRAS method: Applications for the projection of multiregional input–output frameworks and valuation matrices," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(6), pages 1599-1624, December.
    6. López, Xesús Pereira & de la Torre Cuevas, Fernando, 2023. "An alternative for tracing the path between supply and use tables in current and constant prices," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 293-302.
    7. Enrique M. Quilis, 2018. "Temporal disaggregation of economic time series: The view from the trenches," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(4), pages 447-470, November.
    8. Federico Riccio & Lorenzo Cresti & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2022. "The labour share along global value chains. Perspectives and evidence from sectoral interdependence," LEM Papers Series 2022/11, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    9. Baoline Chen & Tommaso Di Fonzo & Thomas Howells & Marco Marini, 2018. "The statistical reconciliation of time series of accounts between two benchmark revisions," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(4), pages 533-552, November.
    10. Athanasopoulos, George & Hyndman, Rob J. & Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Panagiotelis, Anastasios, 2024. "Forecast reconciliation: A review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 430-456.
    11. M. Alejandro Cardenete & M. Carmen Delgado & Patricia D. Fuentes & M. Carmen Lima & Alfredo J. Mainar & Jose M. Rueda-Cantuche & Sébastien Mary & Fabien Santini & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2015. "Rural-urban social accounting matrixes for modelling the impact of rural development policies in the EU," JRC Research Reports JRC94394, Joint Research Centre.
    12. Jakub Boratyński, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Matrix Balancing: Transformation of Industry-Level Data under NACE Revision," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 8(4), pages 219-239, December.
    13. Federico Riccio & Giovanni Dosi & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2023. "Smile without a reason why: functional specialisation and income distribution along global value chains," LEM Papers Series 2023/31, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    14. Rosa Duarte & Vicente Pinilla & Ana Serrano, 2018. "Income, Economic Structure and Trade: Impacts on Recent Water Use Trends in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Wenfeng Huang & Shintaro Kobayashi & Hajime Tanji, 2008. "Updating an Input-Output Matrix with Sign-preservation: Some Improved Objective Functions and their Solutions," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 111-123.
    16. Vladimir Motorin, 2017. "Enhancing the distance minimization methods of matrix updating within a homothetic paradigm," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Bolea, Lucía & Duarte, Rosa & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Sánchez-Chóliz, Julio, 2021. "Disintegration scenarios in the European Union: A case study of Eastern European economies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Barbara Hutniczak, 2022. "Efficient updating of regional supply and use tables with the national-level statistics," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Travaglini, Guido, 2010. "Supervised Principal Components and Factor Instrumental Variables. An Application to Violent CrimeTrends in the US, 1982-2005," MPRA Paper 22077, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Luke Mosley & Idris A. Eckley & Alex Gibberd, 2022. "Sparse temporal disaggregation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2203-2233, October.
    21. Ton de Waal & Arnout van Delden & Sander Scholtus, 2020. "Multi‐source Statistics: Basic Situations and Methods," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 203-228, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:72:y:2018:i:4:p:421-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.