IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v31y2014i5p642-654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Archetypes of an Enhanced System Dynamics Causal Loop Diagram in Pursuit of Strategies to Improve Smallholder Beef Farming in Java, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Novie Andri Setianto
  • Donald Cameron
  • John B. Gaughan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Novie Andri Setianto & Donald Cameron & John B. Gaughan, 2014. "Identifying Archetypes of an Enhanced System Dynamics Causal Loop Diagram in Pursuit of Strategies to Improve Smallholder Beef Farming in Java, Indonesia," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 642-654, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:31:y:2014:i:5:p:642-654
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sres.2312
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Setianto, N.A. & Cameron, D.C. & Gaughan, J.B., 2014. "Structuring the problematic situation of smallholder beef farming in Central Java Indonesia: using systems thinking as an entry point to taming complexity," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 3(3), pages 1-11.
    2. Martin Schaffernicht, 2006. "Detecting and monitoring change in models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 22(1), pages 73-88, March.
    3. Richard Nelson & Davide Consoli, 2010. "An evolutionary theory of household consumption behavior," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 665-687, October.
    4. Hadi, Prajogo U. & Ilham, N. & Thahar, A. & Winarso, B. & Vincent, David P. & Quirke, Derek, 2002. "Improving Indonesia’s Beef Industry," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 114076.
    5. Hounkonnou, Dominique & Kossou, Dansou & Kuyper, Thomas W. & Leeuwis, Cees & Nederlof, E. Suzanne & Röling, Niels & Sakyi-Dawson, Owuraku & Traoré, Mamoudou & van Huis, Arnold, 2012. "An innovation systems approach to institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 74-83.
    6. Jackson, Mike C., 2001. "Critical systems thinking and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 233-244, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Sehoon & Connerton, Timothy Paul & Park, Cheongyeul, 2021. "Exploring the impact of technological disruptions in the automotive retail: A futures studies and systems thinking approach based on causal layered analysis and causal loop diagram," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Kiloes, Adhitya Marendra & Puspitasari, & Sulistyaningrum, Anna & Khaririyatun, Nur & Mulyono, Djoko & Prabawati, Sulusi & Anwarudin Syah, Mohammad Jawal & Devy, Nirmala Friyanti & Hardiyanto,, 2024. "Unravelling the provisioning system of a strategic food commodity to minimise import dependency: A study of garlic in Indonesia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    3. Natalia Brzezina & Katharina Biely & Ariella Helfgott & Birgit Kopainsky & Joost Vervoort & Erik Mathijs, 2017. "Development of Organic Farming in Europe at the Crossroads: Looking for the Way Forward through System Archetypes Lenses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Payam Hanafizadeh & Mohammad Mehrabioun, 2018. "Application of SSM in tackling problematical situations from academicians’ viewpoints," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 179-220, April.
    5. Gábor Király & Alexandra Köves & György Pataki & Gabriella Kiss, 2016. "Assessing the Participatory Potential of Systems Mapping," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 496-514, July.
    6. Valcourt, Nicholas & Walters, Jeffrey & Carlson, Sara & Safford, Katie & Hansen, Lexine & Russell, Diane & Tabaj, Kristi & Golden Kroner, Rachel, 2024. "Mapping drivers of land conversion among smallholders: A global systems perspective," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    7. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.
    8. Amr Abdel‐Latif & Ahmed Saad‐Eldien & Mohamed Marzouk, 2021. "Applying system archetypes in real estate development crises," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 911-922, November.
    9. bahri, muhamad, 2020. "The nexus impacts of the Covid-19: A qualitative perspective," SocArXiv yj8c9, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Sehoon & Connerton, Timothy Paul & Park, Cheongyeul, 2021. "Exploring the impact of technological disruptions in the automotive retail: A futures studies and systems thinking approach based on causal layered analysis and causal loop diagram," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Valerio, Erika & Hilmiati, Nurul & Prior, Julian & Panjaitan, Tanda, 2024. "Steering the herd or missing the mark? Navigating the role of research for development projects as innovation intermediaries in the Indonesian cattle sector," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. EKOJA, Ematun Vivian & OLANIYI, Oyinlola & IHUOMA, Anthony, 2024. "Determinants of Household Consumption Pattern in Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(12), pages 388-411, December.
    4. Isaac Gershon Kodwo Ansah & Bright K. D. Tetteh & Samuel A. Donkoh, 2017. "Determinants and income effect of yam postharvest loss management: evidence from the Zabzugu District of Northern Ghana," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(3), pages 611-620, June.
    5. Colvin, John & Blackmore, Chris & Chimbuya, Sam & Collins, Kevin & Dent, Mark & Goss, John & Ison, Ray & Roggero, Pier Paolo & Seddaiu, Giovanna, 2014. "In search of systemic innovation for sustainable development: A design praxis emerging from a decade of social learning inquiry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 760-771.
    6. Islam, Md. Mofakkarul & Renwick, Alan W. & Lamprinopoulou-Kranis, Chrysa & Klerkx, Laurens, 2012. "Dynamics of Innovation in Livestock Genetics in Scotland: An Agricultural Innovation Systems Perspective," 131st Seminar, September 18-19, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic 135769, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Mingers, John, 2015. "Helping business schools engage with real problems: The contribution of critical realism and systems thinking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 316-331.
    8. Luke Houghton & Heather Stewart, 2017. "Using the ‘Engagement’ Model of Problem Solving to Assist Students in Capstone Learning," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 471-485, October.
    9. Luke Houghton & Larry Crump, 2016. "Temporal Events and Problem Structuring," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 324-340, May.
    10. White, Leroy, 2009. "Understanding problem structuring methods interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 823-833, December.
    11. Maru, Yiheyis & Sparrow, Ashley & Stirzaker, Richard & Davies, Jocelyn, 2018. "Integrated agricultural research for development (IAR4D) from a theory of change perspective," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 310-320.
    12. Yearworth, Mike & White, Leroy, 2014. "The non-codified use of problem structuring methods and the need for a generic constitutive definition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 932-945.
    13. María Isabel Palacios-Rangel & Juan Manuel Vargas-Canales & Jorge Aguilar-Ávila & Joaquín Huitzilihuitl Camacho-Vera & Jorge Gustavo Ocampo-Ledesma & Sergio Ernesto Medina-Cuellar, 2018. "Efficiency of small enterprises of protected agriculture in the adoption of innovations in Mexico," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 34(146), pages 52-62, February.
    14. Colleen M. Eidt & Laxmi P. Pant & Gordon M. Hickey, 2020. "Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Marco Valente, 2012. "Evolutionary demand: a model for boundedly rational consumers," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1029-1080, November.
    16. Greiner, R, 2004. "Systems framework for regional-scale integrated modelling and assessment," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 41-51.
    17. Barbara Scozzi & Nicola Bellantuono & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2017. "Managing Open Innovation in Urban Labs," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 857-874, September.
    18. Schulz, Jan & Mayerhoffer, Daniel M., 2021. "A network approach to consumption," BERG Working Paper Series 173, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.
    19. Lowe, David & Espinosa, Angela & Yearworth, Mike, 2020. "Constitutive rules for guiding the use of the viable system model: Reflections on practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1014-1035.
    20. Pwint Kay Khine & Jianing Mi & Raza Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:31:y:2014:i:5:p:642-654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.