IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v96y2015i4p1117-1135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Officials and a “Private” Matter: Attitudes and Policies in the County Sheriff Office Regarding Violence Against Women

Author

Listed:
  • Emily M. Farris
  • Mirya R. Holman

Abstract

type="main"> This article examines sheriffs’ attitudes and their offices’ policies concerning violence against women and assesses the connection between their attitudes and policies. Using data from an original, national survey completed in the fall of 2012 of elected sheriffs (N = 553), we evaluate a battery of rape and domestic violence myths and examine the presence of various violence against women policies. We find that many sheriffs express belief in inaccurate myths concerning violence against women. We find strong connections between sheriffs’ attitudes about women's equality and their attitudes about violence against women. In turn, their attitudes about gender-based violence relate to training and policies for addressing these cases. In an office like that of the sheriff, with both bureaucratic and political elements, attitudes of political leaders influence policies. Our findings suggest an important connection between elected officials’ attitudes and policy actions beyond the traditional legislative arena.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily M. Farris & Mirya R. Holman, 2015. "Public Officials and a “Private” Matter: Attitudes and Policies in the County Sheriff Office Regarding Violence Against Women," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(4), pages 1117-1135, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:96:y:2015:i:4:p:1117-1135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ssqu.12182
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iaryczower, Matias & Lewis, Garrett & Shum, Matthew, 2013. "To elect or to appoint? Bias, information, and responsiveness of bureaucrats and politicians," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 230-244.
    2. Richard J. Harris & Juanita M. Firestone & William A. Vega, 2005. "The Interaction of Country of Origin, Acculturation, and Gender Role Ideology on Wife Abuse," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 86(2), pages 463-483, June.
    3. Sun, Ivan Y., 2007. "Policing domestic violence: Does officer gender matter?," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 581-595, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emily M. Farris & Mirya R. Holman, 2023. "Sheriffs, right‐wing extremism, and the limits of U.S. federalism during a crisis," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(2), pages 59-68, March.
    2. Menghan Zhao & Weijie Gao & Youlang Zhang, 2022. "Not your destiny: Autonomy in marriage choices and the intergenerational transmission of domestic violence among Chinese women," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(2), pages 328-345, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camara, Fanny & Dupuis, Nicolas, 2014. "Structural Estimation of Expert Strategic Bias: The Case of Movie Reviewers," TSE Working Papers 14-534, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    2. Elliott Ash & W. Bentley MacLeod, 2015. "Intrinsic Motivation in Public Service: Theory and Evidence from State Supreme Courts," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(4).
    3. M. Candace Christensen & Richard J. Harris, 2019. "Correlates of Bystander Readiness to Help Among a Diverse College Student Population: An Intersectional Perspective," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(8), pages 1195-1226, December.
    4. Sebastian Blesse & Philipp Lergetporer & Justus Nover & Katharina Werner, 2023. "Transparency and Policy Competition: Experimental Evidence from German Citizens and Politicians," Munich Papers in Political Economy 27, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    5. Gregory DeAngelo & Bryan C. McCannon, 2019. "Political competition in judge and prosecutor elections," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 167-193, October.
    6. Ash, Elliott & MacLeod, W. Bentley, 2021. "Reducing partisanship in judicial elections can improve judge quality: Evidence from U.S. state supreme courts," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    7. Eijffinger, Sylvester & Mahieu, Ronald & Raes, Louis, 2018. "Inferring hawks and doves from voting records," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 107-120.
    8. Swank, Otto H. & Visser, Bauke, 2023. "Committees as active audiences: Reputation concerns and information acquisition," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    9. Sun, Ivan Y. & Chu, Doris C., 2010. "Who is better for handling domestic violence? A comparison between Taiwanese female and male Officers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 453-459, July.
    10. Hansen, Stephen & McMahon, Michael, 2013. "Estimating Bayesian Decision Problems with Heterogeneous Priors," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 136, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    11. Gerardi, Dino & Grillo, Edoardo & Monzón, Ignacio, 2022. "The perils of friendly oversight," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    12. Maria Flavia Ambrosanio & Paolo Balduzzi & Massimo Bordignon, 2015. "Who should review public spending?," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 109-127.
    13. Poteyeva, Margarita & Sun, Ivan Y., 2009. "Gender differences in police officers' attitudes: Assessing current empirical evidence," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 512-522, September.
    14. Elliott Ash & Michael Poyker, 2024. "Conservative News Media and Criminal Justice: Evidence from Exposure to the Fox News Channel," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(660), pages 1331-1355.
    15. Lundman, Richard J., 2010. "Are police-reported driving while Black data a valid indicator of the race and ethnicity of the traffic law violators police stop? A negative answer with minor qualifications," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 77-87, January.
    16. Lockwood, Ben, 2017. "Confirmation Bias and Electoral Accountability," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 11(4), pages 471-501, February.
    17. Drazen, Allan & Ozbay, Erkut, 2016. "Does “Being Chosen to Lead†Induce Non-Selfish Behavior? Experimental Evidence on Reciprocity," CEPR Discussion Papers 11338, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Giovanni Facchini & Brian Knight & Cecilia Testa, 2020. "The Franchise, Policing, and Race: Evidence from Arrests Data and the Voting Rights Act," Working Papers 2020-18, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    19. Anoop Maithani & Manisha Misra & Saaylee Potnis & Shringar Bhuwania, 2012. "The Effect of Gender on Perception of Glass Ceiling, Mediated by SRO and Attitude toward Women as Managers," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 37(2), pages 107-123, May.
    20. Benjamín Pereira-Román & Concepción López-Soler & María Vicenta Alcántara López, 2021. "Gender Perspective in Research on Interventions in Children with Experiences of Parental Gender-Based Violence: Application of GPIHR Criteria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:96:y:2015:i:4:p:1117-1135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.