IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v105y2024i4p1253-1265.html

Which one is your team? Supraordinate identity around the classic match

Author

Listed:
  • José Francisco Navarro‐Picado
  • Eduardo Torres‐Moraga
  • Manuel Alonso‐Dos Santos

Abstract

Objective The article analyzes up to what extent the supraordinate identity made up by the classic match, influences fans’ consumption intention of media and official merchandise, through a justifiability mediation, while assessing a moderation effect that an identity threat has on the proposed model. Method The phenomenon was tested through structural equation modeling on a 439 fanbase sample. Participants are fans from both of the clubs who play the Classic match of their league and were randomly allocated into a threat circumstance or a control situation in order to test the identity threat moderation effect. Results Findings suggest that this supraordinate identity has a positive impact on media and merchandise consumption intentions, while legitimacy and permeability forecast its existence. These results argue that fans from both teams experience an identity threat either when their club is under menace and when their rival is. Conclusion This is the first article examining a supraordinate identity fabricated by salient rivalries, which is counterintuitive, and how these individuals experience an identity threat when their rival is at risk. The Classic denotes an important marketing instrument, where leagues and clubs can develop stories and rivalries to attract broader audiences.

Suggested Citation

  • José Francisco Navarro‐Picado & Eduardo Torres‐Moraga & Manuel Alonso‐Dos Santos, 2024. "Which one is your team? Supraordinate identity around the classic match," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1253-1265, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:4:p:1253-1265
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13401
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cody T. Havard, 2014. "Glory Out of Reflected Failure: The examination of how rivalry affects sport fans," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 243-253, July.
    2. José F. Navarro-Picado & Eduardo Torres-Moraga & Manuel Alonso Dos Santos & Brandon Mastromartino & James J. Zhang, 2023. "Strategies of German Bundesliga and English Premier League clubs for the COVID-19 crisis: the case of international broadcasting fans," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 209-232, January.
    3. Inman, J.J. & Zeelenberg, M., 2002. "Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions : The attenuating role of decision justifiability," Other publications TiSEM 44060120-bd30-40e0-a97f-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Sardana, Deepak & Cavusgil, Erin & Gupta, Narain, 2021. "The growing popularity of spiritual brands: What drives purchase intent?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    5. Inman, J Jeffrey & Zeelenberg, Marcel, 2002. "Regret in Repeat Purchase versus Switching Decisions: The Attenuating Role of Decision Justifiability," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 116-128, June.
    6. Fatih Karanfil, 2017. "An empirical analysis of European football rivalries based on on-field performances," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 468-482, December.
    7. Micevski, Milena & Halkias, Georgios & Herz, Marc, 2019. "Multiple consumer identities and the crossover effect of the EU identity in predicting domestic and foreign product preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 622-631.
    8. Alexandra Filindra & Melanie Kolbe, 2022. "Latinx identification with whiteness: What drives it, and what effects does it have on political preferences?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(6), pages 1424-1439, November.
    9. Elizabeth B. Delia, 2015. "The exclusiveness of group identity in celebrations of team success," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 396-406, July.
    10. Appiah, Dominic & Howell, Kerry E. & Ozuem, Wilson & Lancaster, Geoff, 2019. "Building resistance to brand switching during disruptions in a competitive market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 249-257.
    11. Arne K. Albrecht & Gianfranco Walsh & Simon Brach & Dwayne D. Gremler & Erica Herpen, 2017. "The influence of service employees and other customers on customer unfriendliness: a social norms perspective," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 827-847, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magnus Söderberg, 2008. "Uncertainty and regulatory outcome in the Swedish electricity distribution sector," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 79-94, February.
    2. Camille Magron & Maxime Merli, 2012. "Stocks repurchase and sophistication of individual investors," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2012-02, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    3. Joaquin Gómez-Miñambres & Eric Schniter, 2017. "Emotions and Behavior Regulation in Decision Dilemmas," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Baojun Jiang & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Özge Turut, 2017. "Anticipated Regret and Product Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4208-4323, December.
    5. Patricia H. Born & E. Tice Sirmans, 2019. "Regret in health insurance post‐purchase behavior," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 22(2), pages 207-219, July.
    6. Nagel, Christian & Heidenreich, Sven & Schumann, Jan H., 2024. "Enhancing Adoption of Sustainable Product Innovations: Addressing Reduced Performance with Risk-Reducing Product Modifications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Kuang, Di & Ma, Baolong & Li, Xiaofei, 2024. "Acquiring customers via referral reward programs versus advertising: Who is more likely to provide future referrals?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Tseng, Aihua, 2017. "Why do online tourists need sellers' ratings? Exploration of the factors affecting regretful tourist e-satisfaction," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 413-424.
    9. Florian Teleaba & Sorin Popescu & Marieta Olaru & Diana Pitic, 2021. "Risks of Observable and Unobservable Biases in Artificial Intelligence Predicting Consumer Choice," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(56), pages 102-102, February.
    10. Davvetas, Vasileios & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2017. "“Regretting your brand-self?” The moderating role of consumer-brand identification on consumer responses to purchase regret," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 218-227.
    11. Özalp Özer & Yanchong Zheng, 2016. "Markdown or Everyday Low Price? The Role of Behavioral Motives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 326-346, February.
    12. Kozak, Metin, 2010. "Holiday taking decisions – The role of spouses," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 489-494.
    13. Jiwoong Shin & Dan Ariely, 2004. "Keeping Doors Open: The Effect of Unavailability on Incentives to Keep Options Viable," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 575-586, May.
    14. Huseyn Abdulla & James D. Abbey & Michael Ketzenberg, 2022. "How consumers value retailer's return policy leniency levers: An empirical investigation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1719-1733, April.
    15. Confente, Ilenia & Scarpi, Daniele & Russo, Ivan, 2020. "Marketing a new generation of bio-plastics products for a circular economy: The role of green self-identity, self-congruity, and perceived value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 431-439.
    16. Vishal Bindroo & Xin He & Raj Echambadi, 2016. "Satisfaction—Repurchase Intentions Relationship: Exploring the Contingent Roles of Consideration Set Size and Price Consciousness," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 3(3), pages 115-125, December.
    17. He, Xin & Mittal, Vikas, 2007. "The effect of decision risk and project stage on escalation of commitment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 225-237, July.
    18. Samer Sarofim & Elizabeth Minton & Amabel Hunting & Darrell E. Bartholomew & Saman Zehra & William Montford & Frank Cabano & Pallab Paul, 2020. "Religion's influence on the financial well‐being of consumers: A conceptual framework and research agenda," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 1028-1061, September.
    19. van de Calseyde, Philippe P.F.M. & Zeelenberg, Marcel & Evers, Ellen R.K., 2018. "The impact of doubt on the experience of regret," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 97-110.
    20. Mulder, Laetitia B. & van Dijk, Eric & Wilke, Henk A.M. & De Cremer, David, 2005. "The effect of feedback on support for a sanctioning system in a social dilemma: The difference between installing and maintaining the sanction," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 443-458, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:105:y:2024:i:4:p:1253-1265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.