IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v104y2023i4p728-741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does government social spending matter? Exploring how income inequality is associated with charitable giving

Author

Listed:
  • Yongzheng Yang

Abstract

Objective Given the detrimental consequences of income inequality and the importance of charitable giving in society, the relationship between income inequality and charitable giving has attracted much scholarly attention, but less is known about why and how income inequality is associated with charitable giving. This study intends to explore the role of government social spending in the relationship between income inequality and charitable giving. Method Building upon previous theoretical arguments and empirical studies, I argue that income inequality is negatively related to government social spending, and government social spending is negatively related to charitable giving. Using the U.S. county‐level panel data (2011–2017), this study runs a series of fixed‐effects models. Results It finds there is no significant relationship between income inequality and government social spending as well as between government social spending and charitable giving. However, income inequality has a robustly and significantly negative relationship with charitable giving. Conclusion Government social spending does not play a mediating role in the relationship between income inequality and charitable giving, but income inequality actually has a pernicious effect on individual philanthropy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongzheng Yang, 2023. "Does government social spending matter? Exploring how income inequality is associated with charitable giving," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(4), pages 728-741, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:104:y:2023:i:4:p:728-741
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13265
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.13265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:104:y:2023:i:4:p:728-741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.