IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v102y2021i1p209-227.html

Perception of Immigrants in Europe: A Multilevel Assessment of Macrolevel Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Francis D. Boateng
  • Wesley S. McCann
  • Joselyne L. Chenane
  • Daniel K. Pryce

Abstract

Objective In recent times, immigration has been a controversial topic. Discussions about immigration have become common household conversation. The primary objective of the current study is to explore the dynamics of native‐born citizens' attitudes toward immigrants and examine the potential influence of macro‐level conditions. Methods The current study employed multi‐level techniques to examine macro‐level effects on attitudes toward immigrants across 22 European countries. Specifically, three Hierarchical Linear Models were conducted to achieve the study's stated objective. Results The Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) analyses revealed that a country's level of economic development as measured by changes in gross domestic product (GDP) and education significantly influenced native‐born citizens' views about immigrants. Moreover, the number of immigrants (per 1,000 residents) and crime rates determine whether native‐born Europeans will view foreigners positively or negatively. Nevertheless, a country's unemployment rate had no significant effect on perceptions of immigrants. Several individual‐level characteristics were found to predict perceptions of immigrants among native‐born Europeans. Conclusion Results from this endeavor provide insights for addressing common misconceptions about immigration and also help in understanding, from empirical standpoint, how native‐born citizens form their views about immigrants.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis D. Boateng & Wesley S. McCann & Joselyne L. Chenane & Daniel K. Pryce, 2021. "Perception of Immigrants in Europe: A Multilevel Assessment of Macrolevel Conditions," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 209-227, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:1:p:209-227
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12888
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12888?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel K. Pryce, 2018. "U.S. Citizens’ Current Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Immigration: A Study From the General Social Survey," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1467-1483, December.
    2. Jens Hainmueller & Daniel J. Hopkins, 2015. "The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3), pages 529-548, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danielly Sorato & Martin Lundsteen & Carme Colominas Ventura & Diana Zavala-Rojas, 2024. "Using word embeddings for immigrant and refugee stereotype quantification in a diachronic and multilingual setting," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 469-521, April.
    2. Michael K. Dzordzormenyoh, 2025. "Crime Victimization, Immigrants, and Public Opinion in Ghana: A Micro-level Analysis," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 491-511, March.
    3. Alessandro Indelicato & Juan Carlos Martín, 2024. "The Effects of Three Facets of National Identity and Other Socioeconomic Traits on Attitudes Towards Immigrants," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 645-672, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nichole Gligor & David Gligor, 2021. "A roadmap to understanding restrictive immigration policy outcomes," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(4), pages 1830-1847, July.
    2. Andrea F.M. Martinangeli & Lisa Windsteiger, 2019. "Immigration vs. Poverty: Causal Impact on Demand for Redistribution in a Survey Experiment," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2019-13, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    3. Ganserer, Angelika, 2021. "Non-compliance with temporary agency work regulations: Initial evidence from Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-057, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Cattaneo, Cristina & Grieco, Daniela, 2021. "Turning opposition into support to immigration: The role of narratives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 785-801.
    5. Vrânceanu, Alina & Dinas, Elias & Heidland, Tobias & Ruhs, Martin, 2023. "The European refugee crisis and public support for the externalisation of migration management," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 279441, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Wing-Chung Ho & Ken Ka-wo Fung, 2024. "Cultural Conflict and Disappointment: Hongkongers’ Sentiments Toward Taiwanese Authorities Amid Cross-Strait Tensions," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Elangwe Cyntia Malike & Ongo Nkoa Bruno Emmanuel & Minkoua Nzie Jules Rene, 2024. "From Policy to Practice: The Influence of Institutional Quality on the Management of Migration in Africa," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(11), pages 1471-1490, November.
    8. Tukiainen, Janne & Blesse, Sebastian & Bohne, Albrecht & Giuffrida, Leonardo M. & Jääskeläinen, Jan & Luukinen, Ari & Sieppi, Antti, 2024. "What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Dražanová, Lenka & Gonnot, Jérôme & Heidland, Tobias & Krüger, Finja, 2022. "Understanding differences in attitudes to immigration: A meta-analysis of individual-level factors," Kiel Working Papers 2235, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    10. Anne-Marie Jeannet & Tobias Heidland & Martin Ruhs, 2021. "What asylum and refugee policies do Europeans want? Evidence from a cross-national conjoint experiment," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 353-376, September.
    11. Cristina Cattaneo & Daniela Grieco & Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis, 2025. "Out‐group penalties in refugee assistance: a survey experiment," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 127(4), pages 697-741, October.
    12. Jimenez Mori, Raul, 2021. "Eliciting individual preferences for immigrants in the Dominican Republic. Results from two choice experiments," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    13. Tito Boeri & Matteo Gamalerio & Massimo Morelli & Margherita Negri, 2024. "Pay-as-they-get-in: attitudes toward migrants and pension systems," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 63-78.
    14. Caitlin Bletscher & Sara Spiers, 2023. "“Step by Step We Were Okay Now”: An Exploration of the Impact of Social Connectedness on the Well-Being of Congolese and Iraqi Refugee Women Resettled in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Nicolò Conti & Danilo Di Mauro & Vincenzo Memoli, 2019. "Citizens, immigration and the EU as a shield," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 492-510, September.
    16. Briggs, Ryan C & Solodoch, Omer, 2021. "Changes in perceptions of border security influence desired levels of immigration," OSF Preprints wt74y, Center for Open Science.
    17. Fettermann, Diego Castro & Cavalcante, Caroline Gobbo Sá & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Avalone, Marianne Costa, 2020. "Configuration of a smart meter for Brazilian customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Claire L Adida & Adeline Lo & Melina R Platas, 2019. "Americans preferred Syrian refugees who are female, English-speaking, and Christian on the eve of Donald Trump’s election," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Palermo, Francesco & Sergi, Bruno S. & Sironi, Emiliano, 2022. "Does urbanization matter? Diverging attitudes toward migrants and Europe's decision-making," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    20. Alberto Alesina & Armando Miano & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2023. "Immigration and Redistribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(1), pages 1-39.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:102:y:2021:i:1:p:209-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.