IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v56y2022i1p414-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“The greedy I that gives”—The paradox of egocentrism and altruism: Terror management and system justification perspectives on the interrelationship between mortality salience and charitable donations amid the COVID‐19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • S. Venus Jin
  • Ehri Ryu

Abstract

Why do people give and help others in face of their own mortality salience? The existential struggle with the awareness of death impacts the gamut of human cognition, emotion, and behavior. This multi‐method research (∑N = 1,219) explains the psychosocial impact of COVID‐19‐related mortality salience on altruism. Drawing from terror management theory, two studies tested death‐thought accessibility, mortality salience, and anxiety buffer hypotheses. Study 1 (cross‐sectional survey), using structural equation modeling, confirms death anxiety and fear are predictors of powerlessness and materialism which, in turn, predict charitable donations. Study 2 (between‐subjects experiment) confirms the causal effects of COVID‐19‐induced mortality salience on altruism. Controlling income and socioeconomic status, people in the mortality salience treatment condition indicate greater monetary donations ($), ratio of prosocial (altruistic) to proself (egocentric) spending (%), donation of time (hour), monetary valuation of time (hourly rate = $/hour), and economic value of donated time (hourly rate*hour) than the controls. These effects are mediated by powerlessness. Moderating effects of relevant individual difference factors are significant: the greedier, more selfish, narcissistic, materialistic, and system‐justifying the donor is, the higher monetary donations, volunteer time, and perceived value of donated time are, only when the COVID‐19‐induced mortality is made salient but not in the controls. Environmental and dispositional factors jointly influence vulnerability to mortality salience. The paradox of egocentrism and altruism, as an evolutionarily adaptive protective buffer against existential insecurity for social and cultural animals, can help revitalize resilience, thus shedding some lights on the sociopsychological mechanism of consumers' subjective well‐being. Implications for consumer affairs, social marketers, and policymakers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Venus Jin & Ehri Ryu, 2022. "“The greedy I that gives”—The paradox of egocentrism and altruism: Terror management and system justification perspectives on the interrelationship between mortality salience and charitable donations ," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 414-448, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:56:y:2022:i:1:p:414-448
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12381
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richins, Marsha L & Dawson, Scott, 1992. "A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 303-316, December.
    2. Rosellina Ferraro & Baba Shiv & James R. Bettman, 2005. "Let Us Eat and Drink, for Tomorrow We Shall Die: Effects of Mortality Salience and Self-Esteem on Self-Regulation in Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 65-75, June.
    3. David Dubois & Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2012. "Super Size Me: Product Size as a Signal of Status," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(6), pages 1047-1062.
    4. Langan, Ryan & Kumar, Anand, 2019. "Time versus money: The role of perceived effort in consumers' evaluation of corporate giving," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 295-305.
    5. Derek D. Rucker & David Dubois & Adam D. Galinsky, 2011. "Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(6), pages 1015-1029.
    6. Jay J. Van Bavel & Katherine Baicker & Paulo S. Boggio & Valerio Capraro & Aleksandra Cichocka & Mina Cikara & Molly J. Crockett & Alia J. Crum & Karen M. Douglas & James N. Druckman & John Drury & Oe, 2020. "Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(5), pages 460-471, May.
    7. Tomasz Zaleskiewicz & Agata Gasiorowska & Pelin Kesebir, 2013. "Saving Can Save from Death Anxiety: Mortality Salience and Financial Decision-Making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-10, November.
    8. Aric Rindfleisch & James E. Burroughs & Nancy Wong, 2009. "The Safety of Objects: Materialism, Existential Insecurity, and Brand Connection," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(1), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Belk, Russell W, 1985. "Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 265-280, December.
    10. Cha, Moon-Kyung & Yi, Youjae & Lee, Jaehoon, 2020. "When people low in social class become a persuasive source of communication: Social class of other donors and charitable donations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 45-55.
    11. Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2008. "Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 257-267, April.
    12. Naomi Mandel & Dirk Smeesters, 2008. "The Sweet Escape: Effects of Mortality Salience on Consumption Quantities for High- and Low-Self-Esteem Consumers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(2), pages 309-323, May.
    13. Kelly D. Martin & Ronald Paul Hill, 2012. "Life Satisfaction, Self-Determination, and Consumption Adequacy at the Bottom of the Pyramid," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(6), pages 1155-1168.
    14. Yimin Huang & Junjun Cheng & Rongwei Chu, 2020. "Resilience and well‐being production among vulnerable consumers facing systematic constraints," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 1328-1354, December.
    15. Ioannis Kareklas & Darrel D. Muehling, 2014. "Addressing the Texting and Driving Epidemic: Mortality Salience Priming Effects on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 223-250, June.
    16. Keisha M. Cutright & Eugenia C. Wu & Jillian C. Banfield & Aaron C. Kay & Gavan J. Fitzsimons, 2011. "When Your World Must Be Defended: Choosing Products to Justify the System," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(1), pages 62-77.
    17. Zaleskiewicz, Tomasz & Gasiorowska, Agata & Kesebir, Pelin & Luszczynska, Aleksandra & Pyszczynski, Tom, 2013. "Money and the fear of death: The symbolic power of money as an existential anxiety buffer," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 55-67.
    18. Wilson Bastos, 2020. "Want to make me happy? Tell me about your experiences but not your objects," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 978-1001, September.
    19. David Dubois & Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2012. "Super Size Me: Product Size as a Signal of Status," Post-Print hal-00681415, HAL.
    20. Jonas, Eva & Sullivan, Daniel & Greenberg, Jeff, 2013. "Generosity, greed, norms, and death – Differential effects of mortality salience on charitable behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 47-57.
    21. Maria C. Pereira & Filipe Coelho, 2019. "Mindfulness, Money Attitudes, and Credit," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 424-454, June.
    22. David Dubois & Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2011. "Generous Paupers and Stingy Princes: Power Drives Consumer Spending on Self versus Others," Post-Print hal-00621230, HAL.
    23. Rajesh Iyer & James A. Muncy, 2016. "Attitude toward Consumption and Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 48-67, March.
    24. R. Bret Leary & Richard J. Vann & John D. Mittelstaedt, 2019. "Perceived Marketplace Influence and Consumer Ethical Action," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1117-1145, September.
    25. Wendy Attaya Boland & Ingrid M. Martin & Marlys J. Mason, 2020. "In search of well‐being: Factors influencing the movement toward and away from maladaptive consumption," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 1178-1194, December.
    26. Robert Aitken & Leah Watkins, 2017. "“Harm or Good?”: Consumer Perceptions of Corporate Strategic Giving in Schools," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 406-432, July.
    27. Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky & David Dubois, 2012. "Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value," Post-Print hal-00724231, HAL.
    28. Samer Sarofim & Elizabeth Minton & Amabel Hunting & Darrell E. Bartholomew & Saman Zehra & William Montford & Frank Cabano & Pallab Paul, 2020. "Religion's influence on the financial well‐being of consumers: A conceptual framework and research agenda," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 1028-1061, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth A. Minton, 2022. "Pandemics and consumers' mental well‐being," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 5-14, March.
    2. Qihui Xie & Xun Xie & Siwei Guo, 2022. "The Factors Influencing Public Satisfaction with Community Services for COVID-19: Evidence from a Highly Educated Community in Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wangshuai & Raghunathan, Rajagopal & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2022. "Powerlessness, variety-seeking, and the mediating role of need for autonomy," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 706-723.
    2. Li Yan & Hean Tat Keh & Xiaoyu Wang, 2021. "Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 499-516, March.
    3. Yong Zhang & Jiayu Ao & Jiayue Deng, 2019. "The Influence of High–Low Power on Green Consumption: The Moderating Effect of Impression Management Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Khalil, Mary & Khan, Saira & Septianto, Felix, 2020. "Effects of power and implicit theories on donation," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 98-107.
    5. Mourali, Mehdi & Yang, Zhiyong & Pons, Frank & Hassay, Derek, 2018. "Consumer power and choice deferral: The role of anticipated regret," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 81-99.
    6. Danielle J Brick & Gràinne M Fitzsimons & Tanya L Chartrand & Gavan J Fitzsimons & Gita JoharEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2018. "Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 991-1014.
    7. Koo, Jayoung & Im, Hyunjoo, 2019. "Going up or down? Effects of power deprivation on luxury consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 443-449.
    8. Hwang, YooHee & Shin, Joongwon & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "So private, yet so public: The impact of spatial distance, other diners, and power on solo dining experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 36-47.
    9. Michael J. Barone & T. J. Bae & Shanshan Qian & Jason d’Mello, 2017. "Power and the appeal of the deal: how consumers value the control provided by Pay What You Want (PWYW) pricing," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 437-447, September.
    10. Wong, Jimmy & Lalwani, Ashok K. & Wang, Jessie J., 2022. "The interactive effect of power and self-construal on consumers’ preferences for brand-logo size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 279-296.
    11. Na Young Lee & Stephanie M. Noble & Dipayan Biswas, 2018. "Hey big spender! A golden (color) atmospheric effect on tipping behavior," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 317-337, March.
    12. Ronald Hill & Kelly Martin & Lan Chaplin, 2012. "A tale of two marketplaces: Consumption restriction, social comparison, and life satisfaction," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 731-744, September.
    13. Veronica L. Thomas & Kendra Fowler & Christina Saenger, 2020. "Celebrity influence on word of mouth: the interplay of power states and power expectations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 105-120, March.
    14. Wong, Jimmy & Newton, Joshua D. & Newton, Fiona J., 2014. "Effects of power and individual-level cultural orientation on preferences for volunteer tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 132-140.
    15. Yufei Zhang & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Andrew S. Manikas & Abhi Bhattacharya, 2023. "To exploit or explore? The impact of crowdfunding project descriptions and backers’ power states on funding decisions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 444-462, March.
    16. Choi, Woo Jin & Park, JaeHong & Yoon, Ho-Jung, 2018. "Your gift choice for your boss versus your subordinate would not be the same: The interplay of power and giver-receiver role on consumers' gift preferences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-7.
    17. Wang, Yajin & John, Deborah Roedder & Griskevicious, Vladas, 2021. "Does the devil wear Prada? Luxury product experiences can affect prosocial behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 104-119.
    18. Jaspers, Esther, 2018. "Opening up on consumer materialism," Other publications TiSEM a21cb1c8-5af1-46cc-9ea0-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Liselot Hudders & Mario Pandelaere, 2012. "The Silver Lining of Materialism: The Impact of Luxury Consumption on Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 411-437, June.
    20. Rares MOCANU, 2013. "Brand Image as a Function of Self-Image and Self-Brand Connection," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 1(3), pages 387-408, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:56:y:2022:i:1:p:414-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.